• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

*PATTERN 4*

Started by Johnlegend, Apr 14, 03:48 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Drazen

Quote from: clothdog on Jul 05, 05:58 PM 2011
Possibly.I modified the original a little bit. It was posted I think in 2007 on another forum. There were a few astute people who liked it and did well and some said it would never holdup long term.I hate to say this but I took a $1000 br yesterday and rolled it into $5400. I had to leave because I had family plans. I took an $800 br and rolled it into $4600 on airball. Again, I'm not saying this is the holy grail but it works for me and my friend who uses it. if I could play this online so you could see me do it I would.
CD :thumbsup:

I hope you understand what joiner29 wanted to say. The worst thing you can do on any forum is to say how you are winning good amounts of money in short time, without revealing method. So, or you gonna give us that method whatever it is to examine, or dont ever mention things like that, otherwise you are gonna start losing your credit here. I hope you understand.

Regards

Drazen

clothdog

Quote from: drazen_cro on Jul 06, 06:29 AM 2011
So, or you gonna give us that method whatever it is to examine, or don't ever mention things like that, otherwise you are gonna start losing your credit here. I hope you understand.

Regards

Drazen
What??? ??? "So, or you gonna give us  that method whatever it is to examine " Give us?
Who are you to demand??? That's the problem with people like like you..Gimme, gimme, gimme. What have you got for me today? I'm surprised people like john, who has given so much and continues even survives on these boards with all the leeches and condescending people who criticize and  don't contribute anything. Am I pissed? You bet I am.  >:(  Listen,my friend, before you open your big mouth, Do you want to know something Drazen? I posted one of my methods (which I use and have done very well with) here not too long ago.  Got ZERO, did you here me? ZERO replies.No one was interested. :o   Obviously it had no merit to warrant  even a reply. But I got NONE. Go look at it if you want to. I was hoping to get feedback. I put alot  of my ideas on VLS years ago and they were willing to offer suggestions  and test . Most people here are too interested in what JL, Scooby, X has to say and not some other guy who might have a little something. They are great contributors, and I applaud them and everyone here and their contributions but don't go off on me when I already posted some of my work and no  one cared or thought it was worth two shits. I am more than happy and looking for improvements in my stuff and not to hide from anyone who will help.  maybe I will try one more time with my changes to see if anybody will even test it. :yawn: I hope YOU understand. See you later.
CD

warrior

Quote from: clothdog on Jul 06, 08:33 AM 2011
What??? "give us that method whatever it is to examine " "Give us?" Who are you to demand??? Listen,my friend, before you open your big mouth, Do you want to know something Drazen? I posted one of my methods (which I use and have done very well with) here not too long ago.  Got ZERO, did you here me? ZERO replies.No one was interested. :o  Go look at it if you want to. I was hoping to get feedback. But I got NONE. People are too interested in what JL, Scooby, X has to say and not some other guy who might have a little something. They are great contributors, and I applaud them and everyone here and their contributions but don't go off on me when I already posted some of my work and no  one cared or thought it was worth two shits. I am more than happy and looking for improvements in my stuff and not to hide from anyone who will help.  maybe I will try one more time with my changes to see if anybody will even test it. :yawn: I hope YOU understand. See you later.
CD
the intersting thing is even though there are no replies,i myself will always search old system and see if they can be tweaked there so much here so to no be offended ,there will be someone that will be itnerested.

Drazen

Quote from: clothdog on Jul 06, 08:33 AM 2011
What??? "give us that method whatever it is to examine " "Give us?" Who are you to demand??? That's the problem with people like like you..Gimme, gimme, gimme. What have you got for me today? I'm surprised people like john, who has given so much and continues even survive on these boards with all the leeches and condescending people who criticize and  don't contribute anything. Am I pissed? You bet I am.  >:(  Listen,my friend, before you open your big mouth, Do you want to know something Drazen? I posted one of my methods (which I use and have done very well with) here not too long ago.  Got ZERO, did you here me? ZERO replies.No one was interested. :o  Go look at it if you want to. I was hoping to get feedback. But I got NONE. People are too interested in what JL, Scooby, X has to say and not some other guy who might have a little something. They are great contributors, and I applaud them and everyone here and their contributions but don't go off on me when I already posted some of my work and no  one cared or thought it was worth two shits. I am more than happy and looking for improvements in my stuff and not to hide from anyone who will help.  maybe I will try one more time with my changes to see if anybody will even test it. :yawn: I hope YOU understand. See you later.
CD

I am realy sorry you got pissed. That wasnt my intention at all. I apologize. And now yes, i  saw you posted method with no replis, and honestly, first time i see this. Somehow it skipped me.
You got it too much serious, i wasnt demanding strictly anything, just trying to get a point...
I ll test your method and get you feedback, you deserve it. And i agree with you that most of guys here want HG or whatever they call, method which they will use wtithout thinking, and get rich overnight... I am not one of them. And i respect you same as Jl, or scooby or anyone else here. Number of posts doesnt have to mean too much..

Best to you
                        Drazen

clothdog

Thanks Drazen. I appreciate the help.
CD :thumbsup:

monaco

My results so far from papertesting Smartlivecasino, live dealer or airball:

Total games played: 89
Total games won: 79
Total games lost: 10

Strikerate: approx. 8 to 1

Balance: -10units

Double losses: 2

Longest winning streak: 30

Longest 1st game winning streak: 14

Played H/L only, hit and run, no game within 20 games of the previous.

Will carry on testing to see if reaches higher strikerate.

woods101

Ok.

I propose a variation on this method.
You list results in matrix of 3 as before - HLH etc..
You look for a repeat of a pattern:

HLH
HHL
LHL
HLH..

You bet against the repeat of this pattern after the same interval of spins so...

HLH
HHL
LHL
HLH
HHH
LLH
     -Bet here against HLH. If you lose then bet against the same pattern again after the same spin interval, so...

HLH
HHL
LHL
HLH
HHH
LLH
HLH - loss.
LH0
HHL
LHH - win.

All the while you are looking out for other patterns forming to bet on.

HLH
HHL
LHL
HLH
HHH
LLH
HLH - loss.
LH0
HHL
LHH - win.
HHL...


I propose a 6 stage martingale - 1,2,4,8,16,32.  63 units in total.

For better peace of mind or a larger bet look for 3 patterns equally spaced and bet against the fourth one forming.

Woods

Chrisbis

Tell me what the difference is between this type of matrix bet, and just making a pure guess on High/Low, and Marty out when U get it wrong?

U see, when U think Random can't possibly do the think your betting against,
is has a horrible habit of doing exactly that.
That 'moment' has now past, and unless u make a Time-Machine, can not be altered and played again.

The next "Moment-of-Opportunity" is still just a 50:50 chance of happening.

The 'Past' moment, bears no reflection of the next occurrance, and so,
your left in exactly the same position as U would be,
if u just guess the outcome, and as I say, Marty out your MM depletion.

So, since its getting darker all the time in the Uk Winter...........what's the difference Mr Dark Oak?

[reveal=Here's a Reveal, for the Reveal Watchers!]
Oak is my favourite Wood.
[/reveal]
Roulette..........................
Physical in Nature, Random in Opportunity                                                    The Reveal Originator!

ego

Quote from: Chrisbis on Nov 17, 02:57 AM 2011
Tell me what the difference is between this type of matrix bet, and just making a pure guess on High/Low, and Marty out when U get it wrong?

U see, when U think Random can't possibly do the think your betting against,
is has a horrible habit of doing exactly that.
That 'moment' has now past, and unless u make a Time-Machine, can not be altered and played again.

The next "Moment-of-Opportunity" is still just a 50:50 chance of happening.

The 'Past' moment, bears no reflection of the next occurrance, and so,
your left in exactly the same position as U would be,
if u just guess the outcome, and as I say, Marty out your MM depletion.

So, since its getting darker all the time in the Uk Winter...........what's the difference Mr Dark Oak?

[reveal=Here's a Reveal, for the Reveal Watchers!]
Oak is my favourite Wood.
[/reveal]

Old and what the point with a roulette board and experiment when it is 50/50 no matter what you do.
Let them have fun and find some-thing they like and can relax with - that is all.

I would say there is only three ways.
Repeats and no repeats or favorites or no favorites or balance or imbalance.

If you would pick one it would be the same if you know how to capture the momentum.
Its all about to relax and feel good about a bet selection and feel that you have control about what you are up against and in the same time being realistic - that sound like a human roulette system player.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

StackBundles

Anything you do is gonna be 50/50 so whatever you do to make up your mind is as good as choosing one straight off the top of your head right?

but why is it your more likely or appears to be that you will get it correct

i bet that this pattern will not come next RBRB i feel whenever i place a bet like this i seem to do better than the following

i bet that this pattern will come next BBRR i find that this is harder to get right

your views...?


Chrisbis

Do U think, that your two chosen patterns are a little 'Linear' in dimension?
(just sticking to one third of the possible EC's available)

By that I mean, wouldn't this next pattern, be as good, if not better, to break?.....

I bet that, this will not occur again..... B, H, O, O, H, B.... and equally followed by... R, H, L, R, O, L, H, R.


U see what I mean?

Chose the a 'Tool' and ask randoms 'nuts' to fit your multipurpose Spanner!

Just as  good, as formulating, an illusion matrix,
not matter how much U may find them pleasing to the eye.
Roulette..........................
Physical in Nature, Random in Opportunity                                                    The Reveal Originator!

woods101

I agree. A more complex pattern the better to a degree. But the question is the bet, how large it is and also how easy it is to place if time is a problem.
See my next post in notepad b4 I hijack this one totally. ' 4 X 9' ....

subby

Quote from: Johnlegend on May 30, 05:02 PM 2011
Excellent Strato1985 you are reading the game not just playing it robotically. I like that. Yes often in a live casino you get some annoying patrons. I've had chips stolen. And even somone claiming my chips were theirs when I won of course. I often chose times when there aren't too many people on one table. A game is a game. It will win anywhere anytime if its a good method.

I would suggest something like a 600 pound BR and use 2,4,8=14 units as your level 1 stakes and 4,8,16=28 units as your level 2. When you get to double that, you double your stakes. You always want a minumum of around 15 times your total risk. Once you have 1,200 units in your bankroll forget it. You have pulled clear and will never look back. Once you have 3,000 you have reached a level where a daily gain comparable to a living wage is a reality. Keep that bankroll growing there are no surprises with this method it will deliver over and over. Take advantage of it.

Do you win say bankroll(3000) + 1000 then take out the 1000 to get you back to your bankroll of 3000? Do you use more than one casino or land based casinos? I'm scared that if I'm taking out £1k every couple of months with no real losses that I'll get barred and they will keep my bankroll or something :/

Dying to try this hit and run method when pay day comes. Perhaps a £100 initial BR with 1, 2, 4 betting tier one. Would that be a feasible option for me? Perhaps playing 9am, 5pm and 11pm for one win at a time = 3 wins a day( £3 winnings per day  until bankroll is higher)
Regards
Subby

subby

Quote from: Gordonline on Jun 18, 07:39 PM 2011


I will be covering Zero and turning it into my friend  ;D

Thanks JL

Gordon

Hello, can you tell me % of my bets I should stick on zero to cover it? Do I also need to put same amount also on my bets for example.

I'm betting £1.00 on 1st dozen and £1.00 on 3rd dozen....Do I need to do that bet and as a side bet put £0.10 on green zero...

OR...do I do the two x £1.00 bet...put £0.10 on green zero and then add a single £0.10 chip on
to the £1.00 bets to make it  - £1.10 on 1st dozen and £1.10 on 3rd dozen and £0.10 on green?

Hope you're still on the forum to answer lol...if anyone else has any info/help then please jump in. Thanks

Sub
Regards
Subby

moles40

Quote from: Johnlegend on Apr 14, 03:48 PM 2011


HLH-PATTERN 1
LLL
HLL--NINE SPINS NO ZERO.

2, You now bet against the FIRST PATTERN forming as the FOURTH PATTERN (SPINS 10-12)


Welcome to *PATTERN 4*



Why does waiting 9 spins then betting that the first 3 spins don't appear in that order for spins 10-12 increase your chance of winning .The odds are still 50/50 :-\


Any random choice gives you the same chance.


-