A complete street within 12

[frood]

I'm a long time lurker and first time poster.  Mr J I want to thank you for this method as it has not only made me money, but has brought back the enjoyment of roulette.  I was getting bored of robotically following systems or odds-based flat betting and this makes a very pleasant change of pace. 

[esoito]

Welcome, Frood!

A nice post which I'm sure Mr J will appreciate. 

[MrJ]

Thanks for the compliment. Sometime soon, I'll be posting a few more examples just to make sure we are all on the same page.

Ken

[GLC]

MrJ,

Thank you very much for this system.  I tested it a few times on betvoyager demo mode and it's always done well.  Being US based, we have to overcome the second zero, which with some systems is almost insurmountable.  But this one isn't even phased by the second zero.

I've been discussing, recently, the "percieved" tendency for airball machines to repeat a little more than they should.  The airball machine I play on certainly makes be believe that it is one of them.  So, I decided to  play this system on my airball machine and since there's no physical relationship between the numbers in a street on the carpet, I thought it would take better advantage of the balls tendency to land where it's landed not too long ago by betting streets based on the physical wheel instead of the carpet.

I divided the wheel into 3 number sectors and started testing some historical spins I had from my airball machine.  I hoped to get at least as good of results as playing carpet streets.  Did I?  The answer is yes!  This works at least as well and maybe just a smidgen better with wheel based streets vs carpet streets.  I only tested a few hundred spins, but was constantly jumping into plus territory with a continual increase.  There are a lot of exit points with this system.  Sometimes you find yourself back down in the hole, but usually only for a short time.  The graph would probably look like a crosscut saw but with a gradual incline.

I've just started testing it on a 0/00 wheel so not enough data to make a definite determination.  It's a little harder to play than carpet based, but may be worth the effort.  On airball at least.  With a live dealer spinning the ball, maybe better, maybe worse, who knows?  On RNG? Well I don't want to stir up that can of worms.

I think I can verbalize to the world, "Ken don't post no junk!"  

This one only takes a few hundred units to play with comfort.   That's refreshing.

Cheers,

George

[esoito]

"I think I can verbalize to the world, "Ken don't post no junk!"

The double negative suggests the exact opposite!! 

(Sorry, George. Couldn't resist it. )

[GLC]

"I think I can verbalize to the world, "Ken don't post no junk!"

The double negative suggests the exact opposite!! 

(Sorry, George. Couldn't resist it. )

You obviously didn't grow up in the South.  We don't even know what double negatives are.  Sounds to me like someone lost twice in a row!

[F_LAT_INO]

Whenever see Georges positive thoughts about a method
in I jump.....therefore will test some tonight and of it goes for a real play on Airball tomorrow....
Oh yes many many diff.methods from here did I play for real....thats how I tesit it as here its
very cheap 1/7 of euro 1 unit........but will do a wheel sectors testings as am only playing Airball.
Will let you know the results tomorrov.

[MrJ]

*PLEASE* follow the rules exactly. Too many times in the past I hear...."hey Ken, it didn't work out all that well".

Only to find out, they were playing it wrong. You will NOT make 800K with this. Pity I have to throw in that disclaimer.

I will post a few examples soon. I have company in town right now, heading out to the city shortly!    I'm limiting myself to 20 beers tonight. 


Ken

[F_LAT_INO]

And I really play this today,but sectors/3/wheel based,
and gave up after about 30 spins...as very diff.to track thisway
/maybe better as suggested/no lose no win....
20 bears??Are you in one piece today sir???

[GLC]

And I really play this today,but sectors/3/wheel based,
and gave up after about 30 spins...as very diff.to track thisway
/maybe better as suggested/no lose no win....
20 bears??Are you in one piece today sir???

That difficulty tracking also makes it difficult to test on demo mode on-line. 
I'm going to keep testing on-line when I have time because it is a very good method.  Well worth the effort.  Just have to come up with a form or something to fill in that will keep things moving along. 

Like I have said before.  I'm not really playing for much money now because I don't have the time.  I'm gathering systems that have promise for the day when I can quit working so much, get my adopted children raised and have some peace and quiet.  Then, I think this will be an arrow in the quiver.

[esoito]

After 20 bears he now has an unbearable hangover.

[ewarwoowar]

yes, i bet he's feeling a bit grizzly today.

[MrJ]

In terms of difficulty tracking? >>> I play nothing unless its EASY to follow. I think the tracking part is very easy. No need to track anything on paper, I think we agree on that. Watch your history board for the last 12 numbers. If it goes past 12 numbers, so what, only watch those 12.

You *SHOULD* know you layout without looking, thats the basics. Lets say a 32 just hit. In a half a second (without looking) you should think....31, 33. See if there is a 31 or a 33 in the last 12 spins. If so, its time to bet.

Lets say a 21 just hit. In a half a second (without looking) you should think...... 19, 20. See if there is a 19 or 20 in the last 12 spins. If so, its time to bet. The only TWO things you need to watch closely are.....what just hit and what number dropped from the last 12. I find it quite easy to play.


Ken

[frood]

I've had no real difficulty tracking either.  You just need to remember 3 things as each spin comes :

1) What number(s) you're waiting for
2) Which is the least recent number that you're watching.  (i. e if a 4 comes then a 6, I'm waiting for 5 to show up but know that 4 is the one that came first.  Once that drops off the end I know that street is over with)
3) With each spin take a quick glance down the last 10 to see if it has a match.

But really, once you know your streets it only takes a glance to know if it has any matches.

[ego]

I briefly touched on this subject in the past. I think its a GREAT idea but not all 'rules' have been thought out yet, that's why its in this section.

This would be flat betting. If you watch the history board (the last 12 hit numbers), take a CLOSER look. Many, many times, we see a complete street has hit. I have messed around with this type of play (real money) and have kind of good results.

FOR EXAMPLE >> Lets say we have a 31 and a 33 hit in the last 12 spins. Bet on that 32 until either the 31 or 33 drops from the 12 last spins. Lets say a 32 does hit (win).....no more betting until either the 31 or 33 drops, then bet on that number. We are always looking for a COMPLETE street to have hit in a short period of time and it happens OFTEN.

We might be betting on more than one number. Lets say we have the 10, 11, 22 and  24 have all hit in the last 12 spins. We would be betting on the 12 and 23. This is also called EVENT betting, which I have talked about in the past. Any thoughts/questions?

Ken

I wondering and assume there is no difference using table or wheel layout based upon the principal above.
But for me i wondering if same idea would be the same using wheel layout.

26 0 32 15 19 4 21 2 25 17 34 6 27 13 36 11 30 8 23 10 5 24 16 33 1 20 14 31

Would it not be better to make it sector based using neighbors then just assume numbers all over the wheel order would hit ...