• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Can A Winner Not Be Noticed If Posted On This Forum?

Started by GLC, Apr 29, 09:42 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GLC

I've noticed some people posting on different topics trying to get more people interested in the topic.

What needs to be in a topic to get people to start testing and asking questions and posting results, etc...

With all the members with oddles of experience, could a long term winner get passed all of them without them recognizing that it's worth exploring with more than a cursory look?

Do any of you know of a system that you feel confident is an excellent system with very good earning potential that slipped through the cracks?

What do ya think?

George
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

Skakus

I think there’s bound to be a few solid methods that slip through.

What I’ve noticed on the forums is eventually all threads die the same death regardless of merit. That doesn’t mean all the methods are forgotten or shelved, because I’ve also noticed that the forums only ever have a handful of active members. The vast majority of forum readers are guests and non-active members. They never contribute, and never say thank you. They just pick the eye teeth out of the place and go about their business. So be it.

The more active members are often more advanced players, or engineers, so I think they tend to skim over most of the ideas put forward as they are usually busy working on or playing there own ideas. Some times a gem of knowledge will come along, but that usually gets incoporated into something they already have. (I admit I'm guilty of this).

I’m sure there are many people playing with some success using methods taken from or inspired by the efforts of active forum members.

Just my opinion.
A ship moored in the harbour is safe, but that's not what ships are made for.

jon86

Many good methods here. People just dont takt the time to try them out.

Jon

StackBundles

Yes ive had methods with very good win to loss which i could of done with a bit of help off people but no one ever seems interested then my eye catches something else and ive forgotten about the last one shame

MAX

Yes if complicated and takes to much time to decipher.

Regard
MAX

Proofreaders2000

I think people are looking for a system they can play every spin and easy to remember.

catalyst

max
you are trying to be evasive while we are asking to explain the betting method of iceman  in another thread.
thanks catalyst

MAX

Hi catalyst

Read the explanation of Atlantis on the Iceman 1313 topic if you still don't understand lets make a appointment in the chat room then I can try and explain it.

Regards
Max

iggiv

I am sure there are lots of methods here which may work well combined together with hit-n-run.
But many people tend to make this kind of mistake -- they are looking for one best method, which would work on a consistent basis no matter what. And when they  see it is not happening (and it won't-- most likely) they start looking for something else.

superman

GLC short answer, yes probably, although I always look at every method posted, most of them are hybrids or morphed from old methods/systems, some look good to test, as you know I then bot it for a long test, all so far have failed long term tests.

Now to all those who suggest hit n run, I have never believed in this as you never know what the table/random is doing when you start a session, if you have been hitting and running and surviving, you've just been lucky thats all.

To those who say there are good methods here, my question is, define "good", follow the last is good OR opposite to last is good WHEN its working!! nothing is a long term winner, yet.

It all comes down to money management me thinks, you can have a good strike rate with a progression BUT when the losses do come they come like busses to close together and eat all the profit built up so far, you just have to glance at all the threads with methods, win, win, win lose method changes or gets so twisted interest is lost.

And of course theres the members that jump on anything thats pumped up, wanting to believe the HG is finally here, and to confuse the rest or neysayers or maths guys they say they are up up up all the time, if so, why are they still searching?? and not cashing in, they wouldn't waste time on forums if the method they praise is working ALL the time. So the HG hasnt yet been found, let the search continue.
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

iggiv

i define good like this:

people test systems, and they work OK in the beginning, and they sink after. People scrap them as "not working", but with different system approaches and hit-n-run maybe u can make them work.


yes, u never know what u can encounter in roulete and u may lose as well, but if statistically those systems win in the beginning more than lose, then there will be more chance that u win, than that u lose.

F_LAT_INO

To me the method/in the right hands/that wins more then it loses is a winning method,
for a human every day play. No method will stand long fantasy testings,and if the method
tanks once in 200000 spins/thats what I have experienced here/the tester says IT DOESN'T WORK.
My friends it all depends how you individually play any method.
If you looking for a method that you will play via BOT against BV on 24h basis,
watching how your BR is rising,then you are really naive,its like playing poker
against a player who watches your hand.RNG....thats not a roulette neither any
serious roulette player believes it.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

catalyst

Quote from: MAX on Apr 30, 08:35 AM 2011
Hi catalyst

Read the explanation of Atlantis on the Iceman 1313 topic if you still don't understand lets make a appointment in the chat room then I can try and explain it.

Regards
Max

hi max
i have read iceman post already. iceman has posted one different bet selection which is different than the previous one. and you mentioned in your last post in iceman thread thatbusing the new bet selection method you have won all of your previous sessions. vundorosa and others also asked you to explain it with few spins. unfortunately you remained silent. we request you again to explain with few words and spins.

i am afraid that i can not join you in chat room as our different time zone won't allow it.

thanks
catalyst

MAX

 Hi catalyst

Read the "The notepad > EC betting" post there are 4 sessions there and plus the rules and the reason way the final bets were made.

Take you time and study it and you will understand it for sure.

All the best.
Max







-