Plus and Switch

[GLC]

I haven't found a system I can call the Holy Grail, but I have an idea that may be called the Holy Grail playing method.

Here's my idea.  Let's say that, forgive me Bayes and friends, there's something to JohnLegend's assertions regarding the hit-n-run method of play.  And, unless we're going to call him a flat out liar about his records, he's either the luckiest person in the world or there's something to this hit-n-run method.  And, so far I haven't found any system that I can just sit down and play continuously  with a certainty to win. 

What if we have an arsenal of systems, for example "pattern breaker", "pattern 4",  "Divide and Conquer", "Best of 3", etc...  You can substitute any systems you like for the ones I listed.  You might even include one of mine in the mix!

First, before you start playing, decide how many units you intend to win for this session. say 5 - 10 units.

You go to the casino or you log on to your favorite on-line casino and you play a system until you reach +1 or more.  The "or more" means that as soon as you make a bet that puts you at a new high bank mark, that ends that system.  Then you switch to another system and play it until you reach +1 or more.  Then you switch to another system and play it until you reach +1 or more.  Etc.... until you reach your win target.

Take a break for a while or a day and do it again.

You can see my idea.  Keep the roulette Gods confused by switching systems on them regularly before they can gather their wits about them and start hitting you with the losing sequences.

I haven't thought through every consideration for how to play this method most effectively.  This is just my initial thoughts.  I don't think it can be worse than other playing styles.  Can it?

Be gentle please with you comments.  I'm fragile.

George

[F_LAT_INO]

I often do that George/have mentioned it somewhere recantly/
playing many systems from the memory/no need a spredsheet/
especially in casino where you frequently play...confuse them.

[Wally Gator]

I've done the same, although don't have the confidence F_LAT does without pencil and paper.