• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

So where should we fokus on...?

Started by RouletteExplorer, Aug 10, 11:21 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RouletteExplorer

We have explored :
Repeaters
Sleepers
Patterns
Law of third
Progressions
ETC.

As we saw nothing can provide us an advantage over the game...

So where should we fokus on?

(exept visual ballistics and Bias)

I am unable  to think of something new... I really need a new way to start exploring it.
After all my name is RouletteExplorer  :)
What we need is new thinking...

superman

QuoteSo where should we fokus on?

My personal opinion is money management, we need to keep bets low and recovery fairly quick but not as quick as martingale type progressions where we recover ALL losses in one win, this is how we are losing currently. To give you a quick example of money management, select 1 ec any one you like, place your bet and keep adding 1 unit after a win UNTIL you are ahead, this will win, usually for a good few units BUT eventually the bet size will be too big, or keep adding 1 unit if you are behind win or lose just keep adding units 1 at a time until you are ahead then start again.
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

RouletteExplorer

Yes but as we know this is also 1 of all the long run losers.
You gave me an example of something that is already tested to death and it is a loser.

That s why I am asking about any new ideas.

But thanks for your reply.  :)

i also think that the winner isn t hiding in the money management alone.
If we don't make bets that are more accurate-reliable than the random -2.7 ,then we can t rely on a money management.
What we need is new thinking...

MAX

 Look at patterns and see what happens and what not,make a pattern from a pattern or combination of patterns and play against that pattern not happen.

Maybe there is something to explore..... :question:

Regards
Max


RouletteExplorer

Thanks for the idea MAX.
The problem with this (as you may already know) is that we do not know when a pattern will start and when a pattern will finish.
So we are betting again by luck. And luck in Roulette always means -2.7.(European Roulette)

Let s all have a debate here please.
Without a new way to look for , we can t explore anything.

Try not to fall into the same losers(ideas-ways) over and over again. Recycling losers is the worst thing it can happen in a Roulette Forum.

Ps. As you see the 2 members above gave 2 ideas that are already tested for so many years and can t produce a winner.
I already adviced NOT to look on the same losers on my 1st post.
What we need is new thinking...

RouletteExplorer

Recycling losers =   -Makes you unable to find a winner -
                               -Makes you feel tired -
                               -Makes you feel disapointed-
                               -Makes you lose time-
What we need is new thinking...

MAX

A  single number have  a unique signature and combined with analysis of  the distinctive formation created by the movement there is still lot to explore.

Even one number can for a pattern. Strange but true..

IF the pattern is difficult to form the next few spins there is no need to know when it starts or stop.

Regards
Max

RouletteExplorer

If what you say it s true , then this is exactly what C.H.A.R.L.S W.I.N.3.M.I.L.L.I.O.N was talking about.

BUT you and all ppl must already know that this person is the biggest Roulette scammer ever.
So what you say it is NOT true...you can say that something is true only when you have found it and only when you can prove it....

Ok anyone else? any new ideas?

What we need is new thinking...

MAX

Ok, if you do not want my input so be it....

But i do not agree with you statements.

Regards
MAX


RouletteExplorer

I am truly glad that you had a nice laugh when you read the scammers name.
But your input is exactly his input. It seems very clearly that you are inspired from his words.

Here we are looking for things that will be real and not illusions.
What we need is new thinking...

RouletteExplorer

ok let s take the problem from an other ancle.

If we will explore and record millions of spins and we see that the average miss on a dozen is X times.
Then why can t we start betting 1 spin before the trigger(X) and win most of the times?
This betting way would automatically makes us having a winning system...

But what is the thing that is making us lose even with this way?
What we need is new thinking...

Steve

Whatever you focus on, it must be to increase accuracy of predictions. How do you do that? Well, do you look at the table, or the wheel? The answer is in front of you.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Proofreaders2000

Time management.  It should take no longer than 1 hour/day (or four-15 minute sessions) to reach a sensible profit goal.

Steve

Yes but without increasing accuracy of predictions, time management only determines over what time period we lose.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

frost

Quote from: RouletteExplorer on Aug 10, 01:56 PM 2011
ok let s take the problem from an other ancle.

If we will explore and record millions of spins and we see that the average miss on a dozen is X times.
Then why can t we start betting 1 spin before the trigger(X) and win most of the times?
This betting way would automatically makes us having a winning system...

But what is the thing that is making us lose even with this way?


you could do this and you would win every day forever BUT you would only win maybe $1-3 aday. the problem is the amount of spins it takes for the trigger to arrive, unit size and progression on top of errors in connections makes this method counter-productive.


i no. i have tried. if all else fails i will revert back to this method  :thumbsup:

-