Columns/Dozens - What pattern hits the most?

[vladir]

Hi,

I was looking at some spins and noticing something... maybe it's just coincidence, because this being roulette, it's random, and they all should happen in equal ammount of times...

Anyway, I wanted to ask if any one already has studied this or if not, maybe someone could test over a large sample, column or dozen related, wich of this 3 patterns occurs more often:

1 - 2 last hit columns

2 - 1 last hit column + 1 coldest column

3-  2 cold columns (the ones except the last hit column)

[ophis]

Well its not dozens/column but its for numbers. So its relevant.
link:://rouletteforum.cc/actuals-spins/biasedincorect-spin-data/


Quick explanation:

After X number (horizontal) number Y (vertical) have hit Z amount of time.

	X
Y	Z

In above thread you can see that each numbers hit roughly the same amout of time.

So dozens/colums patterns will as well hit equal ammount of time (in large samples)

[vladir]

That is correct ophis. I analyzed 700.000 spins I got from somewhere here in the forum, and I confirm what you said. However, I noticed something interesting (maybe it was coincidence). The total of occurrences are the same, but the most that, in those 700.000 spins that , for example, playing the  LAST HIT DOZEN +  LEAST HIT DOZEN (a dynamic pattern as I call it) ,  the consecutive misses of this pattern where the maximum of 10(and only once!). This is a litle bellow from what I expected, since I had previous knowledge by other tests, that combinations of fixed patterns (1st and 2nd/ 2nd and 3rd / 1st and 3rd DOZENS) missing for 14 - 16 times are not impossible ...

Anyway, I don't know of any progression of a size of 10 to double dozens... and I don't know if this was just coincidence/luck...


I also think I noticed another funny thing... but I still need to elaborate on this a litle better... Wil post if it's of interest.


Regards.

[warrior]

That is correct ophis. I analyzed 700.000 spins I got from somewhere here in the forum, and I confirm what you said. However, I noticed something interesting (maybe it was coincidence). The total of occurrences are the same, but the most that, in those 700.000 spins that , for example, playing the  LAST HIT DOZEN +  LEAST HIT DOZEN (a dynamic pattern as I call it) ,  the consecutive misses of this pattern where the maximum of 10(and only once!). This is a litle bellow from what I expected, since I had previous knowledge by other tests, that combinations of fixed patterns (1st and 2nd/ 2nd and 3rd / 1st and 3rd DOZENS) missing for 14 - 16 times are not impossible ...

Anyway, I don't know of any progression of a size of 10 to double dozens... and I don't know if this was just coincidence/luck...


I also think I noticed another funny thing... but I still need to elaborate on this a litle better... Wil post if it's of interest.


Regards.

interesting