Street repeaters

[RouletteExplorer]

We are tracking the spins .
When 1 number has hit 2 times we are betting the street that includes this number.
If a second number on the same street has also hit 2 times we are adding 1 more chip on the same street.
And ofcource if the 3d number of the street has also hit 2 times we are adding also 1 more chip on it.
So maximum bet on 1 street is 3 chips (so it can t get out of control)

The session ends if we are in a new profit or if the cycle of 37 spin will end without any new profit.

Its a system for not only  the hot numbers of 37 spins but also of some sleepers that can give us nice wins because by betting the street(that a number has hit 2ice) there numbers in it that haven t hit at all or that have hit only once.
The system also includes the power of the old system of Mtijono "in 37 spins a full street must hit". Some of the old members of VLS forum must be familiar with it.
So it has in :
Hot numbers (every hit of more than 2 times of a number its a win)
Sleeping numbers
Numbers that has only hit once
The nice observation that in 37 spins almost everytime a full street must hit

Tested 20 sessions so far and all won.

It was just an idea. Use it,test it or improve it. your choice
Thank you.

[RouletteExplorer]

I just tested 10 more sessions
9 won
1 lost -23 chips.

Still very up.

[Drazen]

Hm..  in 37 spins a full street must hit

If that is so, we can wait 2 numbers from street to hit and play missing one (3rd number from that street), and add every new number like that, one will hit most of time in 37 spin cycle, right? And progressions shouldnt be big...

Regards

Drazen

[Chrisbis]

As drazen says;-

The nice observation that in 37 spins almost everytime a full street must hit

..............that is some statement!

U sure its factually correct, because if it is, then would be very easy to design a bet for that event, occurring so frequently.

My guess is its more like within 60+ spins.

But I bow/stand here to be corrected Sir.
Nice idea tho. 

[Drazen]

As drazen says;-

..............that is some statement!

U sure its factually correct, because if it is, then would be very easy to design a bet for that event, occurring so frequently.

My guess is its more like within 60+ spins.

But I bow/stand here to be corrected Sir.
Nice idea though. 

I have to admit that i have never heard or examined this event... (that one street hits full in 37 spin cycle)

But if that is so as Chris said also, serious bet can be created 

Regards

Drazen

[RouletteExplorer]

""""Hm..  in 37 spins a full street must hit

If that is so, we can wait 2 numbers from street to hit and play missing one (3rd number from that street), and add every new number like that, one will hit most of time in 37 spin cycle, right? And progressions shouldnt be big...""""

What tou described is the old system of the VLS member Matijonno.
With this  way the system won a lot lot of spins but in the end like all systems failled....
It is a system that have been tested to the death...
Great win ration but still not enough to be a winner
I really can not understand how it is possible for you guys to so so much exitment about an old system(old observaton)....if it was a winner we wouldn t bother posting here systems and ideas...we would be in the casinos playing and making money...



This is why I made MY system, because it is supposed that its an improvement of the old one and it has also a lot of other factors in it....

[RouletteExplorer]

For you my exited new Explorers the old system from VLS forum is here
link:://vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=6422.0

If this system was a winner , roulette tables would be close LoL....because its an old system.
If you care to read about other losing ideas and you show so much interest you can go in the VLS forum and read them all......
And this is a system that I consider one of the best out there....Me and Skrizy made it in the good old days of VLS forum.....It is called "Perfect balance system"
link:://vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=8567.0

The point is not to test the old losing systems but to develop new ideas.

[horus]

good on you RouletteExplorer for sharing your ideas.

[MrJ]

I did all this already. I have had a street (and streetS) unhit for 60 spins.

Ken

[amk]

Hello Mr J,

I remember about 5 months ago I came across a few of your methods on another forum........

You have good methods...... 

I emailed you a few times but did not receive a reply. Hope we may receive your insights. Below is the email I sent.

"Hello MrJ,

I had a question about your street system in which you wait for a complete street to be hit. Bayes ran a test for you over 1 million spins and the highest was 70 spins.

How exactly does system work? You wait for two separate numbers of a street to be hit then you start betting on the street until it is hit?
How has the system worked for you?

Also, might you have any data on repeating back to back streets? What the maximum amount of spins is until a street lands back to back?
Could you possibly contact Bayes and see if he could run a test for this over 1 million spins?"



Also, what are your top 3 methods?

Thanks for your time................

[RouletteExplorer]

"""I did all this already. I have had a street (and streetS) unhit for 60 spins."""

60 spins for a street not to hit isn t a lot....it can get even worst....

The point is that if this will happen it doesn't affect my system.

[RouletteExplorer]

Is there anyone that is intrested to test the system or to develop it?
Is anyone testing?

[Skakus]

Does the 37 spin session begin when you start tracking or does it begin when you place the first bet?

[RouletteExplorer]

It begins when you start tracking

[Skakus]

Hi,

I just played 12 sessions here’s how they went.

+6
-14
+10
+9
+3
+7
+8
+7
+4
-53
+15
+10

Overall = +12 units.

This simple system can win pretty well, but the occasional snowball loss sequence is holding it back.

It needs a more finely tuned stop loss for when things are misfiring. That’s where I would be focusing my efforts.