Raindrops - Sleepers ...

[ego]

 
We all know about raindrops - hot and cold - sleepers and so on ...

One thing i notice - it is not often i see gamblers who explore that some events are due to appear to certain degree.
To put it easy so have every cycle repeats and no repeats.
When repeats appears we have imbalance and when one cycle with each event have one show - we have perfect balance.

I play around with this and find better results - then average bet selection - even does should be the same as the random flow has 37 degree of freedom.
But as its more rare that every event has one show each - then there is cycle with repeats - i assume most gamblers would be better of to aim for imbalance then balance.

I did this using 30 number bet selection and pick does lines that had a show and skip the one who follow into a stage being due to sleep.
The hit ratio is very good:

WWWWWLWWWWWWLWWWWWWWWWWWWWWLWWWWW

That is just one among many other options.
Work as well using even money bets or dozen's or lines and so on ...

I will follow up this topic and illustrate this way of picking bet selections - just to illustrate.

Cheers

EGO

[ego]

 
First out i will test and have some fun regarding 30 numbers.
I will start with today's file from random.org.

I will test to play once after one event is due to show - using the lines.

[ego]

 
It exist more advance ways then does i show - is just to illustrate simpel selections.
Today from random org.

WWWLWWWWWWWWLWWWWWWW

5
2
5
4
4
1
5
1
1
6
2 W = WON
4 W
2 W
2 W
4 W
6 W
4 W
5 W
4 W
3 L
5
1
3
2
6
1 W = WON
3 W
4 L
4
3
2
5
1
3 W = WON
6 L
2
2
6
5
5
1
5
5
3
4 L = LOSS
4
6
4
3
5
3
6
5
1
4 W = WON
6 W
2 L
2
3
4
3
4
2
5
2
6
6 W = WON
3 W
2 W
5 W
5 W
4 W
6 W
2 W
1 L
1
3
6
2
5
6 W = WON
3 W
5 W
6 W
5 W
1 W
5 W
5 W
1 W
2 W
3 W
3 W
6 W
4 L
5
2
4
3
3
6
2 W = WON
6 W
3 W
4 W
6 W
6 W
5 W
6 W
2 W
2 W
3 W
6 W
4 W
4 W
1 L
3
4
5
3
3
3
6
4
6
6
2
6 W = WON
1 L
3
1
6
4
6
5
3 W = WON
1 W
5 W
6 W
4 W
6 W
1 W
5 W
6 W
6 W
2 L
3
2
6
2
2
5
6
4
6 W = WON
3 W
1 L
5
5
5
3
1
6
1
4
1 W = WON
1 W
1 W
4 W
4 W
6 W
6 W
1 W
1 W
6 W
5 W
1 W
3 W
5 W
6 W
2 L
3
4
5
4
5
5
5
3
2
6
1 L = LOSS
2
1
3
2
2
6
1
6
4
1 W = WON
4 W
2 W
4 W
2 W
4 W
4 W
6 W
1 W
5 L
4
1
1
4
4
1
3
1
2
2
5
5 W = WON
4 W
3 W
4 W
1 W
4 W
3 W
4 W
5 W
2 W
1 W
1 W
5 W
4 W
5 W
3 W
3 W
6 L
6
2
4
5
3
5 W = WON
3 W
1 L
1
4
3
6
1
5
3 W = WON
4 W
5 W
4 W
2 L
4
4
1
3
5
6
1 W = WON
2 L
6
4
2
5
6
3
2 W = WON
6 W
1 L
6
5
3
3
2
6
5
6
3
1
3 W = WON
1 W
1 W
5 W
2 W
6 W
6 W
3 W
2 W
3 W
6 W
3 W
2 W
6 W
2 W

[ego]

 
Next i will have some fun using even moeny bets and two dozen's ...
Feel free to show me any other selection with higher strike ratio - if you can 

Cheers

EGO

[ego]

 
Playing dozen's we would use skips and LW-Registry - there is not much towards action - but no safe game is - action players is allways due towards higher fluctation.

5 Formations

abc
aaa 
aba
aab
baa


Result using one loss as trigger:

WWLWWWWW

Result with out any skip's

WLWLLLWWWWWW

3 2 1 
1 2 3   
1 2 3
2 1 1
1 1 2
2 1 3
1 3 2
2 2 2
1 2 3
2 2 3
1 1 2 W
1 2 3 LW
1 1 3 W
2 3 2 LL
1 2 2
1 1 1
3 2 1
1 2 2
3 2 2
1 1 2
2 1 3 LW
1 3 2 LW
3 2 2 LW
1 2 2 LW
1 2 2 LW
2 2 1 W
1 2 2 LW
3 3 3 W
1 3 2 LW
2 1 2 LL
1 1 1
1 2 3
3 3 1
3 2 3
1 2 2 LL 
1 2 1
2 1 1
3 3 3
2 3 2
2 2 2
1 3 1
1 1 3
2 1 1 LW
1 2 2 LW
1 3 3 LW
2 3 3 LW
2 1 3 LL
2 2 2
2 2 1
2 2 1
2 2 3
1 3 3
2 1 3
3 3 3 W
2 3 1 LW
2 2 1 W
3 2 3 LL
2 1 3
1 3 3
3 3 2
3 2 3
3 1 2 W
1 1 3 LW
3 3 1 LW
2 1 1 W
2 1 2 W
2 2 2 LL
1 2 1
3 2 1
3 3 1
2 2 1
3 2 3
2 2 2
3 3 3 W
3 1 2 LW
1 3 2 LW
1 2 1 LW
1 3 3 LL
1 3 1
1 1 1
1 1 3
3 2 2
1 1 1 W
2 2 2 W
3 3 1 W
1 2 2 LW
1 3 3 LW
2 2 1 W
3 1 2 LL
3 2 1
3 1 3
1 2 3
3 1 1
2 3 1
2 1 2
1 3 3 W
3 1 2 W
2 3 1 W
2 3 2 W
2 3 2 W

[ego]

 
Result using even money bets: L W W W W W

2 1 1
2 2 2
1 1 2   
2 1 1
1 2 2   
1 2 2
1 1 1   
2 2 2
2 2 2
2 2 1
2 2 1
2 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
2 2 1
2 1 2
1 1 2 LW
1 2 2 LLW
1 1 2 LW
1 1 2 LW
1 2 2 LLW
2 1 2 W
1 2 2 LLW
2 1 1 W
1 2 2 LLW
2 2 1 W
1 2 1 LLL
2 2 2
2 1 1
1 1 1   
1 2 1   
1 1 2     
2 1 2
2 2 2
1 1 1
1 2 1
1 2 2   
1 2 2 W
1 2 1 W
1 1 2 W
2 2 1 LLL
2 1 1
1 1 1   
1 2 1   
2 2 2
2 1 2
1 1 2     
2 2 2
1 1 2
2 1 2
2 2 1
2 2 2 W
2 1 1 W
2 2 2 W
2 2 1 W
2 1 1 W
1 1 1 LW
2 2 2 W
2 2 1 W
2 1 1 W
2 1 1 W
1 2 1 LLW
1 2 2 LLL
2 2 1
1 2 2   
2 1 2
2 2 1
1 2 2
1 2 1   
2 1 1
1 2 1
2 1 2
2 2 1
2 1 1
1 1 1   
2 2 2
1 2 2 LW
2 2 1 W
2 1 2 W
2 2 1 W
1 1 2 LLL
1 1 2 
1 2 1
1 2 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
1 1 2
2 1 1
1 1 2
2 1 2
2 2 2
2 2 2
2 1 2
1 2 1
1 1 2
2 2 2
2 1 1
2 2 1
2 2 2 W
2 1 1 W

[ego]

 
Conclusion.

This is just simple illusrations to show that imbalance is dominating - repeats.
The hard case is to explore them and build a good selection based upon that.

If i had to guess - then i would say Kim Larsen did aim for imbalance using hes selections.
As balance or chasing sleepers is the worst a gambler could be up against.

[ego]

Here is small test using sectors of three witch also work with numbers alone - i test the previos five and what location among the previos five the hit appers.

That is differential betting or using local attractors.
Window of attack three times after previos five.

Imbalance local attractors ...

1 x x x
2 x
3
4 x
5 x x x x x

Here some one could play 3 numbers 6 numbers 12 numbers with very good hit ratio.
Or due towards that 3 has no hits ...

9
6
7
11
4

0 x
3 x
5 x

1
0
2
4
3

7 x
7 x
9 x

1
4
8
9
7

7 x 5

7
10
2
5
3

4
3 x 5

7
10
8
9
11

7 x 1

1
2
10
6
5
5 x 5

2
3
9
0
1

4 x
10 x
7 x

4
5
11
2
9

2 x 4

6
4
11
2
10

6 x 1

11
1
0
3
5

7 x
4 x
4 x

11
4
10
3
5

2 x
6 x
5 x 5

10
4
9
1
0

10 x 1

3
4
0
7
6

8 x
1 x
4 x 2

10
5
3
8
7

9 x
2 x
2 x

6
0
7
8
4

4 x 5

10
3
6
1
9
6
5
11
11
11
0
1
8
1
11
0
11
8
7
1
9
1
10
6
1
10
7
0
8
1
1
5
9
5
10
7
2
8
8
7
0
5
1
10
2
7
1
9
11
0
10
7
10
0
6
6
6
10
11
9
10
2
8
9
1
11
2
10
1
11
4
0
4
3
4
5
5
5
11
9
10
5
6
10
6
6
5
11
11
3
10
6
1
9
8
5
0
5
9
5
0
2
10
4
5
8
3
7
10
9
7
11
9
3
10
0
8
8
9
6
7
2
5
2
1
10
8
6
10
8
7
7
8
0
1
7
0
11
4
8
0
11
2
1
3
9
10
0
10
10
2
0
5