Proofreaders2000 has serious PROBLEMS !!!!

[iggiv]

"this thing that happened between us is YOU that you are responsible....."

well, leopard doesn't change his spots, what can i say. it is all the same story again. whatever happens, your opponents are always responsible for anything that u do or say against them. u will never learn. never.

that's sad.

u see, u post a thread, claiming he has mental problems. he is asking u why You are on crusade against him-- normal question to your weird thread. U say u don't wanna do anything with him, he is responsible. that's very nice. U were clearly  rude to him, u tried to draw negative attention to his personality, now u say he is responsible and discussion is over.  You achieved what u wanted. U think.

but in  in reality u again showed your nice colours. Good for u

[nitrix]

That sounds like a battle between two kids.

Mathematically, all systems are losing. Some have advantage over others, and also disadvantage. Can't we share theses Pros and Cons here? Because I believe that's what this forum is for.

>> Learning from each others.

Stop bickering, honestly. You both are usually always polite and agreeable. I don't want the answer to who's right or not or start shitstorm here. I'm maybe not a Global Moderator but I think this is getting out of hands.

So while you two make your decision I'm gonna use my spare time in a more practical way:

Studying roulette.

[ego]

 
I also reply to that topic as i am expert regarding classical systems for even money bets.
After reading this topic i took a look and he had delete my reply also - strange.

I just pinpoint out what was and what was not.
It is OK if some one play it right and i show a graph regarding that.



Now i am going to post the original - just to state my point.

[Proofreaders2000]

@ Ego:  Your post had nothing to do with the topic (Hank One).  The graph may have confused newcomers who may not have fully understood what my system was about.  I would have appreciated if you had PM'd me about the graph first (since it was off-topic).

[ego]

@ Ego:  Your post had nothing to do with the topic (Hank One).  The graph may have confused newcomers who may not have fully understood what my system was about.  I would have appreciated if you had PM'd me about the graph first (since it was off-topic).

How could it been of topic when with or against RRB is same using any formation of three and result with my chart is what you would get ...

[Proofreaders2000]

"How could it been of topic when with or against RRB is same using any formation of three and result with my chart is what you would get ..."--Ego

Sidney1 deals specifically with dominant ec. RRB--bet R.  Saying both ways works is not in accordance with the system procedure.  Posting an imposing chart about your system defeats the purpose of the thread.

[ego]

 
Not true ...

If you have RRB and bet R it is the same thing as having RRR and bet R or having RRR and bet B or having RRB and bet B.
The result is same as you can not change the math.

So no matter with horse you ride - the result is same.

[iggiv]

That sounds like a battle between two kids.

Mathematically, all systems are losing. Some have advantage over others, and also disadvantage. Can't we share theses Pros and Cons here? Because I believe that's what this forum is for.

>> Learning from each others.

Stop bickering, honestly. You both are usually always polite and agreeable. I don't want the answer to who's right or not or start shitstorm here. I'm maybe not a Global Moderator but I think this is getting out of hands.

So while you two make your decision I'm gonna use my spare time in a more practical way:

Studying roulette.

this is not a battle. all i am interested about here is just to prevent troubles and have quiet normal discussion. so as long as roulette is discussed i am more than happy. thanks

[MrJ]

I have known Proof on these boards for YEARS, he is a stand-up kind of guy!!

Ken

[RouletteExplorer]

Here is not a thread to vote if Proof2000 is a nice person or not.....
here is a topic that shows a bad behavior of him.

[iggiv]

OK, Roulette Explorer.

if u don't stop bothering members on this forum and creating conflicts around your valuable person, i am gonna ask Steve what to do with a troublemaker like u. Period. I am not sure what other mods think of the situation but i think u  just have been too much headache for this forum.

i would like to ask other mods though what  they think. i clearly see u steer troubles here.

God is a witness, i have been patient and gave u enough hints

[RouletteExplorer]

I think that u are imagining things igiv.
Anyone with a normal brain if he will read all my posts in here will see that all I do is help,improve and test.
But as I see you have problem with me without reason.

[Nathan Detroit]

Proofreaders 2000 Sidney system is  playable  just like  any  other EC  method as long  as one KNOWS how  to handle them.

It`s certainly not for  people  who want to sit for  hours at a table  and  walk home  with a pile  of money.It`s  short term .


The basic idea is   sound and it is  up to each gambler  how to apply the MM to  the bet selection .

By the way there is  NO way one can test this method. It boils down to : "the next spin is independent from the previous one."

Nathan Detroit
HAPPY WINNINGS!!!

[speed]

if he will read all my posts in here will see that all I do is help,improve and test.

This is true. I think RouletteExplorer was the right.

[Nathan Detroit]

If help is not asked   one  shall not give it.

Nathan Detroit
HAPPY WINNINGS!!!