Colours

[Maan]

When Numbers 4.5.6.13.14.15.22.23.24.31.32.33 = play RED

When Numbers 7.8.9.16.17.18.25.26.27.34.35.36 = play BLACK

When Numbers 1.2.3.10.11.12.19.20.21.28.29.30 = wait until one number from mentioned groups hit.

Stop on Win and retrack

Progression = 1 1 2 4, or: 1 1 3 5



Results 200 Live-spins:

4-
31
10
10
19 W
3
30
17 -
10 W
28
32-
11
8 
12 W
23-
15
15
30 W
30 
5-
31
11
36 W
3 
34 -
0
14
20 W
2 
10
15 -
23 W
16-
11 W
4-
19 W
9-
26 W
36 -
4  W
34-
28 W
11
0
18 -
9   
21 
15 W
1
34-
26 W
30
26-
9
11 W
2
23-
11
36 W
1 
36 -
31 W
5 -
13
23 W
1
1 
20
33 -
13
13
19 W
31-
22
13
31
9  W
34-
21
16
25
31 W
3
21
9 -
27
11 W
24-
26
1  W
14-
22
13
30 W
12
5-
4
34 W
10 W---------100s
0
21
3
12
24-
36 W
19
10
15 -
36 W
30
15 -
5  W
33-
3  W
7-
11 W
8-
0
7
7
10 W
27-
24 W
23 W
31 -
28
4
14 W
10
28
28
18-
36
10 W
2
18 -
7
19
22 W
8-
36
20 W
2
8-
8  W
28
11
10
12
32 -
32 W
31-
13
16 W
27-
15 W
21
10
31-
8
17
12 W
0
22-
8
0
32 W
3
20
2
10
30
17-
14
2  W
6 -
10
2
25 W
0
35-
36
19
10 W
18-
23
17 W
32-
13
31
33
27 W
15 -
8
5  W

/Maan

[Drazen]

Hm...   


Drazen

[birdhands]

50 wins, 52 losses


Would you be willing to explain the merits of this mode of play?


Thanks,


Sam

[rolf-harris]

can't see any logic in this system, may as well back black if I burp..or red if I fart....

[GLC]

50 wins, 52 losses


Would you be willing to explain the merits of this mode of play?


Thanks,


Sam

I'm thinking that this is like the matrix systems.  We're trying to get a win within 4 attempts.  Really, we have 50 wins and no losses.


Granted, this win rate can't hold up.  But, it's like Compa's  Red/Black Holy Grail.  There's no reason why it should win, but some say it does.  Same here.  There's no reason why it should win.


Testing will show one way or the other.

What I'm trying to understand is why we don't include 1-2-3 and 19-20-21 in the Black trigger line and 10-11-12 and 28-29-30 in the Red trigger line.


GLC

[birdhands]

It seems to me that the progression is winning, not the bet selection.

[Hermes]

birdhands is right the progression keep the strategy over the water. Longer smoother progression could hold it up for longer time.
Yes, the master should explain what's the relation of the numbers to betting plan. It is unclear or just Sudoku?
Cheers Hermes

[catalyst]

birdhands is right the progression keep the strategy over the water. Longer smoother progression could hold it up for longer time.
Yes, the master should explain what's the relation of the numbers to betting plan. It is unclear or just Sudoku?
Cheers Hermes

a quote from GLC make sense:

What if we had a policy that stated that you can't post a system under "Full Systems"  until you have given it a thorough examination. 


1)  Tested it thoroughly
2)  Determined what a proper bank is
3)  Determined a reasonable win target
4)  Come up with a valid stop-loss point
5)  And have a viable recovery method in case of a losing session.


This will keep "Full Systems" category more specialized.  Right now it's full of systems that should be under Notepad or Testing.  I have a few that I'd like to move to Notepad myself.


GLC

this is a fine proposal and need to be enforecd by the moderator, so that the 'full system' area will be crystalized and 'fake' systems will be clustered to a 'compartment'. thanks to George.

[Hermes]

catalyst than there will be no posts on forum and forum would be closed. No one system on forum stand the ground for long period. Probably only the RPRO75 Matrix and Diodoro or so...?
The ideas and opinions on new strategies are the engine for creation of something better. The power is in teamwork on improved, modified or tweaked ideas, call it as you wish. More people more see.
We have already strategy like that: if red comes bet red, if black comes bet black next spin but because we live in world of duality it doesn't always work. We have always choice of 2 (duality). Coin flip is duality also.
Hermes