• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Every system can win in the short-term. It just depends on the spins you play.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Classical Roulette Systems Part 1 - One Dozen or One Column

Started by ego, Oct 10, 02:08 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ego


How to play one Dozen or one Column.

You track the dozen or column for 6 spins and write them down so you get a line.

1
3
2
2
3
1

Now you can start to play and you will follow that line for 6 times and bet that the same will occur, 2 in a row.

12
32
21
22 win 2 of the same.
3
1

Now you have to complete the group of 18 outcomes so you continue to write down the  numbers in the same order as before

121
321
211
221
31
11

Keep doing that until you have a complete group of 18 outcomes whit the principal of 1/3 - like this:

121
321
211
221
313
113

Now you can start over again and track the first 6 outcomes and list them like this:

1
1
3
3
2
3

When you have six you start to play after that line.
Now the first bet is 1 the second is 1 and the third is 3 and you hope to get 2 of the same.

Lets say you didn't get 2 of the same and the line look like this:

12
12
21
32
23
12

Now the bet selection change.
Now you want to get 3 different results.
That they alternate like 231 or 312.

So lets take a look at the line again and if we have
12 then we will bet 3 or if we got 31 we would bet 2.

122
122
211
321 win its alternate.
23
12

So there is 2 different ways you will try to gain a profit.
After we have the first line of 6 outcomes then we will try to get 2 of the same whit the second line for 6 attempts.
If the second line loses then we will try to get a alternate whit the third line, like 123 213 312 for 6 times.

This is how it looks when you tracking the groups whit the principal of 1/3 whit 18 outcomes.

SPIELBANK HAMBURG 2005 01 01 TABEL 1

231
113
213
221
323
213

LW

223
223
223
123
332
322

W

211
122
331
231
233
332

LLW

231
232
222
221
211
112

LLW

122
221
223
313
132
213

LW

333
132
123
123
331
323

LLLW

132
333
122
123
123
311

LW

133
233
313
223
121
323

LLLW

212
223
123
322
111
312

LW

221
133
312
233
132
323

W

222
213
232
221
113
323

W

113
231
113
223
321
113

W

231
313
313
323
312
222

LLLLLW

132
232
321
223
132
211

LLLW

231
112
113
212
233
322

LW

The possibilities are many. Lets say you want to play this strategy whit a 18 steps progression.
Then you just change the line to be 9 instead of 6.
If you like to play in small groups and use fictive loses before you play you can cut it down to be a line of 3.

Regarding this example we need a 12 step progression...

There is 2 way to make one it can be aggressive or humble, I would prefer the last one making a profit for the first 6 steps and after that it would be based upon recovery.

1:   1   +2
2:   1   +1
3:   1     0
4:   2   +1
5:   3   +1
6:   4     0
7:   6     0
8:   8    -2
9:   12  -2
10: 17  -4
11: 25  -5
12: 35  -10
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego


Clustering Tweak with grind and recovery ...

Some one can clustering the outcomes into groups of four.

1. First you play for one repeat and aim for  1 once witch end that session.
Clustering the attacks.

2. If not  1 with no repeat - then you will have four loses with no repeat.
Then you wait for one of this two pattern appears - back to back 1 2 1 or triple 1 2 3.
You play the opposite pattern that did not have a show.

3. This give you first level with the following staking plan 1 1 1 1.
Second level is recovery using the line 2 2 3.
That is a total of 11 units.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

2    3    2 L 1
2    2    2 W 1 Plus 1 End of session.
1    1    3 W
3    3    3 W
3    3    3 W
3    3    3 W
3    2    1 L
1    3    3 L
1    1    1 W
2    3    3 L
1    3    1 L
1    1    3 W
2    1    1 L
2    2    1 W
1    3    2 L
1    2    2 L
2    3    1 L
1    1    2 W
3    3    2 W
2    3    1 L
3    3    1 W
3    1    3 L
3    3    1 W
2    1    1 L
2    3    3 L
2    2    3 W
1    2    1 L
2    2    2 W
3    1    2 L
3    3    1 W
2    1    2 L
3    1    2 L
2    3    2 L
3    2    1 L

3    3    2 W 1 Plus 2 End of session.
1    2    1 L
2    3    3 L
3    1    2 L
3    3    2 W
3    1    1 L
2    3    1 L
1    3    1 L
1    1    2 W
3    3    2 W
2    1    2 L
3    2    2 L
1    3    1 L
1    3    3 L

2    2    2 W 1 Plus 2 End of session.
3    3    1 W
3    3    1 W
1    3    2 L
2    3    2 L
3    2    1 L
3    1    2 L

3    3    1 W 1 Plus 2 End of session.
1    2    3 L
3    2    2 L
2    1    2 L
2    1    3 L

2    3    2 L 1
3    2    1 L 1 W 2 Plus 0 End of session.
1    3    3 L 1
3    2    2 L 1

2    1    1 L 1
3    3    1 W 1 Plus 1 End of session.
1    1    2 W
1    3    1 L
3    3    1 W
1    2    3 L
3    3    2 W
3    3    1 W
1    2    3 L
3    1    1 L
1    1    2 W
2    1    1 L
1    1    2 W
3    1    2 L
3    2    3 L
1    1    3 W
1    2    1 L
3    2    1 L
3    1    2 L
3    1    3 L

1    3    2 L 1
3    1    3 L 1 W 2 Plus 0 End of session.
3    2    2 L 1
2    1    1 L 1

3    1    3 L 1
3    3    2 W 1 Plus 1 End of session.
3    1    1 L
2    1    3 L
2    2    3 W
1    2    1 L
3    3    3 W
3    1    3 L
1    3    1 L
2    1    3 L
2    1    2 L

3    1    2

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

-