Has anybody tried to play on all dozens simultaneously?

[Ruprekht]

Has anybody tried to play on all dozens simultaneously? I am certain that it could be...let's say a winning approach. All you need is a BR not less than 300 units.

[Juiced91]

Yeah we bet a hundred on each and lose money due to the zero or on no zero we make no money. All jokes aside what do you mean simultaneously? Tell us what you are thinking.

[6th-sense]

you will need a bigger bankroll than 300 per dozen or col and no it won,t work this was one of the very 1st things i tried  when i 1st started a long time ago...a dozen can sleep for a very long time over 25  spins your progression will be too high from that point on plus the table limits will contain you...

[Drazen]

This doesn't work. Been there done that...

Regards

Drazen

[GLC]

I'm afraid Drazen is right.  Playing all three dozens, using differential betting to save units when a zero hits, is like most systems in that it wins most of the time but when 1 of the dozens sleeps for a while is the problem.


There are two systems published on this idea.  Trilogy and Harvesting the zeros.  Both fail in the long run.  I haven't been able to come up with a tweak that saves them.


If you like the idea, all you can do is set a reasonable stop loss and win target and enjoy.  But don't expect to bring home a paycheck every time you play.


G

[CashGrowth]

What I did for a while was: wait for any dozen to repeat 4 times, then start a fibonacci on 3 dozens individually and only stop each dozen at a repeat, apart from the last dozen to hit which you will stop at the first hit. Only played about 2 weeks quite long ago, no losses..

[mr.ore]

Don't forget that you can alway play only on two dozens, just substract lowest bet from all three bets, thus eliminating one.

If you bet (d1,d2,d3) = (7,5,2), then you can substract two units from every dozen and bet (7-2,5-2,2-2)=(5,3,0) so you bet 5 units on first dozen and three units on second dozen. You never need to bet all three dozens. This way you minimize loses due to zero.

Playing "all" three dozens was one of the first thinks I tried, even playing several systems on different combinations of dozens and substracting the resulting bets, or distributing big lose among those systems.  It did not work.

You can replace dozen bet with two bets - 1 unit on even chance, and if it loses, then 1 unit on dozen or column. Probability of winning is 18/37+19/37*12/37=0.653031. Probability of winning on two dozens is 24/37=0.648648, that is less. It won't make much differnce though.