The interrupt factor!

[GLC]

This even chance bet selection method is a tweak on my favorite e.c. trend catcher method.


I usually play FTL (follow the last).


If I get RBR I play for the single chops to continue.


If I get  BRRBB I play for the double chops to continue.


Something I've noticed is that very often we get RRRBRRRRRBRRR.  So we have a streak of R's interrupted by a B every now and then.  So, anytime we are betting a trend RRRR and we get a chop  RRRRB, instead of immediately switching to B, we assume that B is an interrupt and continue to play for R's.  If we do get RRRRBR we continue to play for the R trend to continue.


If it were to go to RRRRBB we would assume the B's are trending.


But if we get RRRRBBR  now we have a good indication that doubles are trending so we bet for the doubles to continue.


If we are playing RBRBR (chops) and we get RBRBRR this second R is assumed to be an interrupt so we bet this RBRBRRB.  We ignore the 2nd R and play for the chop.


If we get RBRBRRR, we have a clear indication that R is trending and bet accordingly.


If we have RBBRRBB and we get a B, we treat it like an interrupt and our next bet is for RR like this: RBBRRBBBR. 


If we get another B we have a difinite B trend so bet accordinly.


Those are the basic patterns and interrupts I play for.


I try to switch back and forth between the interrupt method and the non-interrupt method depending on which would be doing the better.  This knowing when to switch is not a science.  It's a personal decision based on experience playing the bet selection methods.


The ability to do this with enough expertise to make a difference falls under the heading of knowing your system like the back of your hand.


All I can say is this is learned by comparing the results of a series of spins against interrupt vs non-interrupt enough so you can tell which would be winning the best.  We're assuming, of course, that the current trend will continue long enough for you to identify a tendency on one side or the other and it will last long enough for you to profit from it.


Often it doesn't.  But all you have to do is win a few more spins every now and then by switching vs just playing one method blindly.  3 or 4 extra wins per hour can make a big difference in your bottom line.


GLC

[Jeromin]

Something I've noticed is that very often we get RRRBRRRRRBRRR.  So we have a streak of R's interrupted by a B every now and then.  So, anytime we are betting a trend RRRR and we get a chop  RRRRB, instead of immediately switching to B, we assume that B is an interrupt and continue to play for R's.  If we do get RRRRBR we continue to play for the R trend to continue.

That's a good idea. Funny how there is such a flood of systems and ideas in this forum, that a potentially v. good one does not elicit a single replay in many days. That is the danger of an over acting forum: lots of leads, few follow thrus.

I think the interrupt concept is good one because playing malcop's bet selection, the occasional one off change is the mark of a difficult or failed session, since it ends up costing 3 units every time. This patter is more natural and should work with a gente progression or, ideally, flat.

Time now for some testing.

Jeromin

[malcop]

Hi GLC,


I agree with Jeromin, it is a good idea and it may help mine or any other mechanical Bet Selection method and make it a bit more organic, because when the patterns fail it is due to an interrupt and it can take quite a few hands to sort itself out.

Recap AAA Bet A, AAB Bet B, ABB Bet B, ABA Bet B, and the killer sequence is ABBABBA ect and when that happens you can experience long losses, will look into merging your idea with mine.

Also Jeromin I would assume that people show no interest in this post is because, it is not 100% mechanical, and that means it could not be programmed into a simulation to do the usual 10,000 to prove it's worth.  If someone was to perfect this style of play it would be purely down to there own skill and you can't measure that can you?

Thanks

malcop

[GLC]

Good luck, Malcop.   


I think this is one of those nuggets lying down on bedrock.  Takes a lot of digging to cash in.

[malcop]

Good luck, Malcop.   


I think this is one of those nuggets lying down on bedrock.  Takes a lot of digging to cash in.

Hi GLC,


So far testing/playing is working out very well, you said you need to know your bet selection inside out, and I know mine because I use it almost every day, the more I practice/play your way the easer each session gets, of course this is very subjective, but I tried to put a few rules in as a guideline while I play for example if I have a streak of 3 plus like this +AAA and it goes to +AAAB my next bet would have been B but now I bet A again, and then if it goes +AAABB then I would bet B, but if it changes to +AAABBA then I would bet A for the 22 to continue and so on, and I do similar for the other patterns I use, I noticed you posted this way back in October last year!


Either way merging your idea with mine is working out very well, as soon as I read your post yesterday I had one of those aha penny dropped moments, that was the fix to my Bet Selection method I was looking for, with my bet selection I have had some extremely good winning sessions, and I have had far more winning sessions than losing ones, last week I was playing live Baccarat and played three sessions all flat-bet, one session ended +18 and over the three sessions made over +35 units.  I use my Bet selection on Roulette & Baccarat.


I do sometimes use progression but mainly I flat-bet with a 10 unit buy-in, try to average +5 or more a session depending on how it is going.


Your interrupt idea is one of those things you need to practice, the more you do the better you will know how to use it with your Bet Selection, but if you do know your Bet Selection method inside out, then don't bother because you have to know when to jump between the two modes of play.


Once again GLC thanks for your post.


Malcop

[Tomla021]

Have always thought that the Malcop trend catcher and the new variations are great. Nothing is foolproof but it does give you a great chance of getting on the trend

[malcop]

Have always thought that the Malcop trend catcher and the new variations are great. Nothing is foolproof but it does give you a great chance of getting on the trend

Hi Tomla021,


The two ideas seem to work well together just trying to incorporate play for the ABBABBA pattern, and you are right nothing is foolproof, and that's when you have to know when to exit either with a small loss or win, and wait for those sessions where you get really good wins.


Thanks


Malcop

[Tomla021]

geez lets get the rules down gentlemen:)
aaa---a
aba---b
aabb--a
aaab--a
??

[vladir]

Funny I was thinking about this today, but applied to doube dozens. "Interrupt factor" in there seems more manageable, since in theory we should it on average 65% of the time.... Sorry for interrupting, just me thinking loud