Anti 5 System

[rolf-harris]

 This is the method I am thinking of making my full time system, meaning, if this system does not work then nothing will.. and I will give up on the idea that roulette can be beaten for ever.

This is the plan :-
We are going bet that the last 5 recorded dozens do not repeat in the exact same order over the next 5 spins.

IE  last 10 spins wont be 3 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 1 2  0r  2 3 3 1 1 2 3 3 1 1.....etc

So it is going to be a Double Dozens progression to bet against a similar sequence happening.

However, we will NOT be making continuous bets. We will wait for a trigger. That being that the first leg of out 5 bets will lose.
So we will only be making a four step progression and not 5.

This is how to play.

1 Look at the latest spin and compare it with the spin that came 5 spins before it...Is it from the same dozen ? This would mean there could be the start of a repeating 5.

2 If the latest spin is from a differnet dozen from the 5th spin previous then there is no trigger...so no bet. We have to wait now for a few spins till we get this trigger.

3 So, if the 5th last dozen is matching, then start betting against the  fourth last spin repeating on the next spin. ( Staking 1 - 1, against this dozen repeating )

4 If lose continue the standard double dozens progression always betting against the fourth last
( 1-1,3-3,9-9,27-27 )

The benefit of waiting for the trigger ( as well as shortening our progression )  is that the Zero may appear during this  time and we will have dodged it, so to speak.
However , if at any time during the actual betting phase the Zero appears then immediately stop the progression and wait for the Zero to clear the last 5 results before looking for the next trigger.
Do not continue betting to try and recoup the loss.


Well, that is the basic idea,..

You can also play this as hit and run winning small amounts at regular intervals..but the system is not as dangerous as if we are betting on every spin and I find it more relaxing like this.

The way I personally have been staking, however, is a bit more adventurous than the standard progression....

I have gone 1-1, 4-4, 13-13 (with one unit on Zero ), and 40-40 ( with 2 units on Zero )...but each to his own.

[StackBundles]

Without even testing this i would say you will win loads of times but then Y'all hit that loser and wipe your profit away get someone to pick the next 5 results and bet against them

[hanshuckebein]

if this system does not work then nothing will.

what made you draw this conclusion? 

cheers

hans

[donik7777]

try this system after can say bye link:://saliu.com/best-roulette-systems.html

[rolf-harris]

HANS. . what i meant to say i suppose is that, deep down I know we cant beat roulette but I reckon thiis is as good a system I will ever come up with after my 3 months of study.

[Chrisbis]

Why in the world do U say that Roulette can not be beaten, eh!!!! 

[reveal]
success could be just round the corner!
U never know! 
[/reveal]

[rolf-harris]

Please direct me to the most likely corner, . . 

[Lee]

Betting against a pattern might work.

Using color, as an example...

If you have a pre-determined Red/Black betting sequence of 5 steps (say R, B, B, R, R) what are
the chances that you will be right on all 5 bets? The answer is 50% (or ½) multiplied 5 times by
itself, or 1 in 32. That means that if you come to the table and tell yourself that for the next 5
bets you will be betting R, B, B, R, R, regardless of what comes up on the table, there is a 1 to 32
probability that you will be hitting all bets right. Now, this is a very low probability.

On the other hand, the opposite is also true, that the probability of hitting all 5 bets wrong is also
1 in 32. That means, that if you come to the table and you bet a predetermined sequence of say
R, B, B, R, R, by using a 5 step Martingale betting method, you have a 31/32 or 97% chance that
one of the 5 bets will hit right.

The strategy then will be to change the 5 Step pattern after every winning sequence. This way you
will be attacking the next 5 bets, with an equal probability of 97% winning chances from run to run.

Now, a 5 step marty is probably not the 1st choice in a negative progression, I just use it for
example convenience. The point is betting a pattern may work, but whether it's best to use
a preconceived pattern or one taken from previous results needs to be tested

Mathematicians may argue with me, that changing patterns doesn’t change the probabilities, but in
my testing every time I set a random betting sequence of 5 bets and apply it, it hardly fails.
No system will win 100% of the time. The goal is a high percentage chance of winning and winning
more sessions than you lose.

I’m not denying the possibility, that one of the patterns that I chose to play could lose all 5 bets,
but again, the chances are only 1 in 32 (or 3%).

[Robeenhuut]

This is the method I am thinking of making my full time system, meaning, if this system does not work then nothing will.. and I will give up on the idea that roulette can be beaten for ever.

This is the plan :-
We are going bet that the last 5 recorded dozens do not repeat in the exact same order over the next 5 spins.

IE  last 10 spins won't be 3 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 1 2  0r  2 3 3 1 1 2 3 3 1 1.....etc

So it is going to be a Double Dozens progression to bet against a similar sequence happening.

However, we will NOT be making continuous bets. We will wait for a trigger. That being that the first leg of out 5 bets will lose.
So we will only be making a four step progression and not 5.

This is how to play.

1 Look at the latest spin and compare it with the spin that came 5 spins before it...Is it from the same dozen ? This would mean there could be the start of a repeating 5.

2 If the latest spin is from a differnet dozen from the 5th spin previous then there is no trigger...so no bet. We have to wait now for a few spins till we get this trigger.

3 So, if the 5th last dozen is matching, then start betting against the  fourth last spin repeating on the next spin. ( Staking 1 - 1, against this dozen repeating )

4 If lose continue the standard double dozens progression always betting against the fourth last
( 1-1,3-3,9-9,27-27 )

The benefit of waiting for the trigger ( as well as shortening our progression )  is that the Zero may appear during this  time and we will have dodged it, so to speak.
However , if at any time during the actual betting phase the Zero appears then immediately stop the progression and wait for the Zero to clear the last 5 results before looking for the next trigger.
Do not continue betting to try and recoup the loss.


Well, that is the basic idea,..

You can also play this as hit and run winning small amounts at regular intervals..but the system is not as dangerous as if we are betting on every spin and I find it more relaxing like this.

The way I personally have been staking, however, is a bit more adventurous than the standard progression....

I have gone 1-1, 4-4, 13-13 (with one unit on Zero ), and 40-40 ( with 2 units on Zero )...but each to his own.

Bet against 5 most recent EC using 1,2,4,5,6,7..... progression. More safe and profitable but sometimes a grind 

Regards

[rolf-harris]

Bet against 5 most recent EC using 1,2,4,5,6,7..... progression. More safe and profitable but sometimes a grind 

Regards

You mean play exactly the same method but on even chances.?
I will start testing that also, thanks. Still only testing my Anti 5....getting up to about 20 units then calling it a day...then same each day...not been "wiped out" yet after a week..so that's 140 units profit.
A wipe-out on the way I stake is 120. Been down to the wire on the last progression a couple of times and it was a bit scary..
Strange how it can be scary even when only testing..lol

[Robeenhuut]

You mean play exactly the same method but on even chances.?
I will start testing that also, thanks. Still only testing my Anti 5....getting up to about 20 units then calling it a day...then same each day...not been "wiped out" yet after a week..so that's 140 units profit.
A wipe-out on the way I stake is 120. Been down to the wire on the last progression a couple of times and it was a bit scary..
Strange how it can be scary even when only testing..LoL

small differences make big differences  hehe  d devil lies in a small detail but roulette is a very unforgiving game.  u have 2 find it 4 yourself.  f u can make d same amount with less a risk just go 4 it.  u will i hope realize it b4 its 2 late.


Regards

[rolf-harris]

small differences make big differences  hehe  d devil lies in a small detail but roulette is a very unforgiving game.  You have 2 find it 4 yourself.  f You can make d same amount with less a risk just go 4 it.  u will i hope realize it b4 its 2 late.


Regards

Don't worry....I am a very cautious person..I am looking to find the nearest thing to the Holy Grail before I start betting for real.... Also I will have to OK everything with my wife...

[Turner]

Don't worry....I am a very cautious person..I am looking to find the nearest thing to the Holy Grail before I start betting for real.... Also I will have to OK everything with my wife...

You need a wife fund. Put a little aside here and there until it comes to £20 or so, then give it to her with these words.
"Heres a few quid out of the Roulette winnings luv. Go get your hair done"
Then use these phrases when asked how its doing
" its been up and down"
"I'm testing a new system on practice mode"
"I did win, but it clawed it back, i'm breaking even this week"
"Oh roulette? not been on it for ages"

When you get to 300U+, you slip the hairdresser scam in again, but £30 this time.

This is called a "salon progression"

[superman]

"Heres a few quid out of the Roulette winnings luv. Go get your hair done"

you slip the hairdresser scam in again, but £30 this time

Please provide name of your wifes hairdresser, those are great rates, my wife spends double that on her mop

[Turner]

 
Please provide name of your wifes hairdresser, those are great rates, my wife spends double that on her mop

LOL@mop