William Hill assholes

[niksa]

After I sent to inquire whether I will be able to play again, they answered me like this;

Dear Niksa,

This is Love from the Customer Services Team.

We acknowledge the receipt of your email.

Yes indeed, but we are unsure of the exact time frame when it will be
available. Just enjoy the rest of the games in the casino. Rest assured that
you will be informed of any updates as soon as possible.

Should you have any questions or concern, please let us know so we can provide
further assistance.

Thank you and have a great day.

So the conclusion is that I can play other games including probably the RNG table,but nevermind my bank is there now at zero and my account with them, waiting for better days.I still feel like a winner as far as Will Hhill 

[Blood Angel]

I still feel like a winner as far as Will Hhill 

Hey man you ARE a winner as far as Will Hill..congrats to you. don't let em bring you down..

[iggiv]

Niksa just leave them alone for now. there are many other 10c live casinos.

[niksa]

Niksa just leave them alone for now. there are many other 10c live casinos.

Yes for sure,if my bank will soon grow a little I will pay all at Betfair Casino,A friend(Godfather) told me that the fairest as far as payments and everything else.He and his associates paid there by tens of thousands of euros,and he said that never had a problems.There is a limit of  0.5-500â,¬,because I wait that my bank will grow a little. From now is everything ok on Joyland Casino,my bank is growing up!! 

[vladir]

Joyland belongs to W.H.  group

Take care.

[Steve]

Soon I'll be starting a site to name and shame casinos like this. That way they'll pay for cheating players.

Sure, like their email says, what they did is common in the industry. But no player will find it acceptable and they'll lose money when they do it, contrary to what their actions aim to do.

[Bayes]

This is pretty shabby behaviour from Will Hill, and it's not even as though you'd taken them for thousands.

You could try writing to the Daily Mail, they love this kind of stuff. Remember Balvinder Sambhi from a couple of years ago?

link:://:.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1218061/In-money-Gambler-banned-UK-casinos-winning-28-000-using-secret-system.html

[superman]

LoL his book is out of stock!

link:://:.amazon.co.uk/Sequential-Roulette-Balvinder-Sambhi/dp/0955965101

Don't forget to read the reviews, looks like a waiting game and good old marty, maybe the press coverage was to get noticed and then make book sales, maybe he worked for the casino too!!

[Bayes]

looks like a waiting game and good old marty

Yep.     I actually spoke to the man when the story came out, he uses a variety of systems but all involve waiting for losses and then doubling up with a VERY scary progression.

But WH deserve some negative publicity over this. They're one of the top UK bookies and make squillions, but they ban someone for winning a paltry 1k?

Makes you wonder though, seeing that you're banned from playing live wheels but NOT their RNG.

[superman]

Makes you wonder though, seeing that you're banned from playing live wheels but NOT their RNG

Maybe live wheels they think you are using DS VB Bias etc, RNG, well nuff said, no footprint as far as they are concerned.

[iggiv]

as i said casinomeister forum has already a list for bad casinos. I don't think William Hill wanna be there.

link:://:.casinomeister.com/rogue/

[niksa]

as i said casinomeister forum has already a list for bad casinos. I don't think William Hill wanna be there.

link:://:.casinomeister.com/rogue/

I will post my problem also there,but some later,now I am at work,ad I have only mobile phone for writting..

[Bayes]

I don't think you could put WH in the 'rogue' category, because they haven't actually cheated you or broken any laws (withheld payment, used rigged games etc). They're just exercising their right to deny access to play. It makes them look bad, but they can do this anytime and don't even need to give a reason for the ban.

[niksa]

I don't think you could put WH in the 'rogue' category, because they haven't actually cheated you or broken any laws (withheld payment, used rigged games etc). They're just exercising their right to deny access to play. It makes them look bad, but they can do this anytime and don't even need to give a reason for the ban.

Yes Bayes,You are right,not necessary to waste words on big players such as dose. 

[iggiv]

banning small consisting winners is OK? yes, they can do it. But see what they say in casinomeister.
i am not sure they will be so happy about it there.  "makes them look bad" is good enough.

I don't think you could put WH in the 'rogue' category, because they haven't actually cheated you or broken any laws (withheld payment, used rigged games etc). They're just exercising their right to deny access to play. It makes them look bad, but they can do this anytime and don't even need to give a reason for the ban.