Trying to avoid doublets on double dozens

[GLC]

Bet the 2 dozens that didn't spin last as long as win.


On a loss bet the most recent hit 2 dozens.


     If win bet the 2 dozens that didn't spin last.
     On a loss bet the most recent hit 2 dozens.


Here's the patter that will kill us 11 22 33 11 22 33.
You can also substitute a zero for any number in the pattern.


Here's the progression if you don't want to play a flat bet:


1-1;  3-3;  9-9  if win repeat, if lose next

3-3; 9-9; 27-27  if win repeat, if win 7 times drop back to previous.  If lose next

9-9; 27-27; 81-81  if win repeat, if win 9 times drop back to previous.  If lose next

27-27; 81-81; 243 if win repeat, if win 9 times drop back to previous.  If lose cry


Here's fibo for more conservative:


1-1   3-3   9-9


2-2   6-6   18-18


3-3   9-9   27-27


5-5   15-15   45-45


8-8   24-24   72-72


13-13   39-39   117-117


etc...


GLC

[amk]

I think this is very feasible GLC.

[buffalowizard]

Hi GLC,


I like this bet selection a lot.


With regards to the progression, I have played with the 1 up on a loss and 1 down on a win. It is more of a grind, but have had some success with it so far!


Thanks


Buff

[buffalowizard]

If you are always betting the most recent spun 2 dozens after a loss,
isn't the killer sequence one like this though?    1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3?

[warrior]

Playing 2 dozens is suicide.Ihave always lost .

[Jeromin]

Playing 2 dozens is suicide.Ihave always lost .

Any good two dozen progression should be tried on last 24 numbers hit,  a very solid bet IMHO.


Jeromin

[GLC]

If you are always betting the most recent spun 2 dozens after a loss,
isn't the killer sequence one like this though?    1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3?

BW,
We're betting the farthest back until a loss and then we're betting the last 2 to hit.  Here's an example of a steady loss sequence.
1 2  3  We bet 1 & 2 because farthest back
1 2 3 3 Lose so switch to betting most recent 2 & 3
1 2 3 3 1   Lose so switch to betting farthest 2 & 3
1 2 3 3 1 1    Lose so switch to betting most recent 1 & 3
1 2 3 3 1 1 2  Lose so switch to betting farthest 1 & 3
1 2 3 3 1 1 2 2  Lose so recent 1 & 2
1 2 3 3 1 1 2 2 3    Lose so farthest 1 & 2
1 2 3 3 1 1 2 2 3 3    Lose so recent 2 & 3
1 2 3 3 1 1 2 2 3 3 1    Lose so farthest  2 & 3
1 2 3 3 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 1   Lose so recent  1 & 3
1 2 3 3 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 2    Lose so farthest 1 & 3
1 2 3 3 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 2 2 etc...
Hope it's clear now.
I've been considering including a mix bet.  That's betting the last dozen to spin and the farthest dozen to spin.  Those are our only options.  Last two, farthest two, last and farthest.  Just an attempt to confuse random.