opinions please

[GARNabby]

I will let you stay in the dark.

You have to know a truth before you can hide it.  And even then, what's real and of value is soon independently re-discovered by others.  That's life.

Have a good one!  Be good to yourself.

[Bayes]

When 10 people on these boards all do that and none of them come close to my figures. You will never hear another word from me.

Since you're throwing down the gauntlet, I'll play the modified CODE4 you post on monday (exactly as you describe). So here is the list so far:

1. Bayes


Any other members feel free to add your name to the list. Let's have a little fun. 

[vundarosa]

Since you're throwing down the gauntlet, I'll play the modified CODE4 you post on monday (exactly as you describe). So here is the list so far:

1. Bayes


Any other members feel free to add your name to the list. Let's have a little fun. 

-------------------

already tested over 50 old c4 sections the reverse way and not impressed.

vundarosa

[Robeenhuut]

Since you're throwing down the gauntlet, I'll play the modified CODE4 you post on monday (exactly as you describe). So here is the list so far:

1. Bayes


Any other members feel free to add your name to the list. Let's have a little fun. 

You can count me in as well 

[albertojonas]

Since you're throwing down the gauntlet, I'll play the modified CODE4 you post on monday (exactly as you describe). So here is the list so far:

1. Bayes


Any other members feel free to add your name to the list. Let's have a little fun. 

1. Bayes
2. Vundarosa
3. Robeenhut
4. Alberto Jonas

[TwoCatSam]

I think I've made myself clear in the past, but to make it official.................



1. Bayes
2. Vundarosa
3. Robeenhut
4. Alberto Jonas
5. TwoCat


I have no desire to silence JL; I have a desire to learn a winning method.  Here's hoping................

Who's the next five?

TCS

[sniper]

 

Since you're throwing down the gauntlet, I'll play the modified CODE4 you post on monday (exactly as you describe). So here is the list so far:


1. Bayes


Any other members feel free to add your name to the list. Let's have a little fun.

1. Bayes
2. Vundarosa
3. Robeenhut
4. Alberto Jonas
5. TwoCat
6. Sniper


JL, thanks for your system.

[iggiv]

i think JL somehow feels the "rhythm" of his methods when to start and when to quit plus money management stuff. Some kind of ability like some others have about VB for example. Yes, there are no reasons for him to lie, and he is not a kind of a forum member to fool the public. He is a serious fella.

there are extraordinary people like John Patrick and Brett Morton, they achieve good results with regular losing (for majority) methods. they have already a gut feeling for roulette i think.


and it will be interesting for me to see his (JL) results as well

[Bayes]

@ iggiv,

I don't deny that intuition can play a part in winning, but JL has said that if we play EXACTLY as he says, then we will all win, so it's up to him to make the rules clear. I Just hope that if and when members report negative results, he doesn't then try to weasel out by saying something like "it's gut instinct" or "you need more practice" or adding extra conditions he didn't mention before, which is what he's done in the past. 

So we have 6 lined up so far, and we need 10.

Any more for any more? 

[atlantis]

I would like my name added to the list as well.

Atlantis.

[superman]

So we have 6 lined up so far, and we need 10.

Any more for any more?

I'll play, when I get the time that is

I would like my name added to the list as well

1. Bayes
2. Vundarosa
3. Robeenhut
4. Alberto Jonas
5. TwoCat
6. Sniper
7. Superman
8. Atlantis

[atlantis]

1. Bayes
2. Vundarosa
3. Robeenhut
4. Alberto Jonas
5. TwoCat
6. Sniper
7. Superman
8. Atlantis

Sounds like a new bunch of marvel comic superheroes !
I wonder what Sniper's and TwoCat's special powers could be ....?

[iggiv]

Bayes, there is no such a thing as "all win all the time". For example John Patrick is also sure that
following all his rules from his book everyone should sooner or later show positive edge over the game. But before u get this positive edge u may still lose quite a few bucks, right? For example i tried his stuff and lost (not too much, but lost anyway). I have no doubts that with some time
if i did not play frequently i could show positive edge after a while after spending some money on it. Well, i did not go for it.
The same story can be with John Legend's stuff. He has been playing this stuff for long time, he feels by his skin already all "dos" and "donts", and if he loses for a week or so he is still in big plus and does not panic.

I doubt that all the guys are in the same situation. They lost some and they gave up i guess. And they have no desire to continue, cause the stuff is not easy and takes time. No free lunch here.

@ iggiv,

I don't deny that intuition can play a part in winning, but JL has said that if we play EXACTLY as he says, then we will all win, so it's up to him to make the rules clear. I Just hope that if and when members report negative results, he doesn't then try to weasel out by saying something like "it's gut instinct" or "you need more practice" or adding extra conditions he didn't mention before, which is what he's done in the past. 

So we have 6 lined up so far, and we need 10.

Any more for any more? 

[Johnlegend]

i think JL somehow feels the "rhythm" of his methods when to start and when to quit plus money management stuff. Some kind of ability like some others have about VB for example. Yes, there are no reasons for him to lie, and he is not a kind of a forum member to fool the public. He is a serious fella.

there are extraordinary people like John Patrick and Brett Morton, they achieve good results with regular losing (for majority) methods. they have already a gut feeling for roulette i think.


and it will be interesting for me to see his (JL) results as well

Its not really that Iggiv. The real difference between me and most others. Is I REALLY BELIEVE in what I am doing from the get go. I am not just going through the motions. Like oh another system to be defeated by math and random doomed from the start.

You see most people don't even think roulette is beatable to start with. Because the genius known as Einstein said so. He is this genius and John Legend is this nobody upstart. that's their thinking from the start. So its a no contest in their minds. So they may play a couple of hundred games and if they don't get instant stellar results. They will immediately dismiss the method as yet another failure. Then others will make changes to the original concept and again they won't get decent results. So the overiding attitude again becomes JL is pulling a fast one with us.

Then the only person who is really playing the method to the letter on real live spins. And staying with it for several 1000 games (ME) Comes on here and posts my results. And the thinking is I am inventing it all. Meantime some less outspoken people in the background are playing the methods to the, or close to the letter. And getting very good results. But they aren't posting them religiously like me. So again the forum thinking is only JL tastes success it can't be real.

Its quite amusing that 5 of the nearly 10 people making up the assault team are people who would like to see me gone from here permanently. Lets hope you are true to the testing and as honest with your results. As the more positive less naturaly biased members of the forum. Again I have asked a few members to post up their results for the methods I already play.
Its time to see I am not the only person on here consistently beating random. Its annoying that this is the general thinking. Especially on a forum that is a lot more positive than some of the awful ones out there.

[Chauncy47]

I am one of the guys in the background that Johnlegend is referring to that is having great success with the hit and run style while challenging randomness.  I have practiced the discipline of hit and run and challenging randomness to do something it simply can't do time and time a again and that's repeat a specific pattern at that very moment in time when i walk up to the table to begin play.   I am from the USA and can only play B&M Casino's.  Sometimes I get a chance to play 5 times a week and sometimes none .... but when I go there, I go there to win and play Code 4, Pattern Breaker and Divide and Conquer.  My BR continues to grow each time.  I posted some comments under the Code 4 thread openly thanking Johnlegend and others for continuing to offer up new ideas and approaches to the game.  I track all my resluts and will be posting them under Johnlegends Reverse Code 4 Attack thread.   I can't wait to see what that thread brings and I look forward openly discussing it and sharing my results.