TwoCat's 24 numbers test.........

[TwoCatSam]

 I have run this auto feature several times for a thousand spins each.  I think I have learned something.

Each time I use a different 24 numbers and each time the 12 I do not use will go on a streak of hitting far more than math says they should.  This always happens!!

Then the 24 numbers will go on a streak of hitting far more than math says they should.  Again, this always happens.  “Always” is not a word I use lightly, but in this case I will.

Now, using an exaggerample, and betting 34 of the 36 Bet Voyager numbers--who would you expect to have the longer run of repeats?  The 2 not bet or the 34 bet?  The 34 would far, far outstrip the 2.  Common math and logic.

Now, why is it I can “seemingly” always go up 100?  If the numbers hit at exactly 2 to1 as they should, I would just stay even.  But I either go up or down; never stay even.

So if you had a greater chance of hitting 24 numbers than 12â€"even though the 12 costs double what the 24 makesâ€"what would happen?  “Seems” to me that if you just sat patiently and waited, the 24 would far, far outstrip the 12 and you would go into profit.

This is exactly what I’m seeing time after time.

This why I believe it happens:

True, the 12 costs double what the 24 pays.  However, over time, you are far more likely to get multiple runs of 24 than you are runs of 12.  It’s like if 12 were A and 24 were B, you’d see more Bs on your chart than As.

Does any of that make sense?

[vile]

Ofcourse it does,Sam.
FLAT_IN_O had a thread about it,2+ on the lose 1-on a win.
But our dear members discarded it as no winning bet.
You know why????Cause they tested it on .....illion spins.
Ridiculous.Real pro players know that we are going to play
300 or so night spins per a session.

[TwoCatSam]

Ville

The word you're looking for is "rouzillion", which is a zillion roulette spins!!

I'll test more and post again.

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

Another hundred and something...........

[TwoCatSam]

Hello

I have decided to take my 24 numbers idea to Dublin.  Since I do not want to sit and click "re-bet" over and over again, I built a device to click the mouse for me.  This is quite a contraption.  (Anyone want to see it?)

Anyway, I am finding the same things at Dublin as I did at BV.  I will make a series of videos showing the going up 100 or going down 100.

Sam

link:://:.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=MtbI9aAPslo#

[TwoCatSam]

Hello

Well, my little mouse clicker had to go in for maintenance.  It seems to be working well now.

I went down about 90 or so when it messed up.  I then went up around 300 or so and am there now.

I'm thinking 100 down is not a good loss limit as that can only be four bets.  I'm thinking on just letting the thing run until I come up 100 or so.

Anyway, here's the video:

link:://:.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=hToba6KOXEc#

[vile]

Sam,
Are you always playing last spun 24.

If so, that really can hardly lose 1 or 2+
on a los 1- on a win.

Think that most real players are aware
of this but find it complicated to play in real
B & M casino.That's the sofa play,considering
fairnes of online play...

[TwoCatSam]

Ville

You are right; getting down 24 bets would be tough.

What I am doing is using a "certain" 24 numbers given to me and just betting them over and over.

Since I'm posting anyway, I lost 100 last session.

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

Hello

I have finally perfected my little mouse-clicker contraption.  Friends, family and neighbors say I'm a genius, but it's really only an ice maker motor and some other junk. 

So I went down about 300# and I decided to just let the thing run and see what happened.  After all, it's play money.  I was at a low of 3100 or so and did not go down into the 2900s at all.  I hovered for about two or three hours just swapping money and then the numbers took off.  Sometimes 15 or more hits in a row at 12# profit each.  Then a couple of losers and back to winning.  I finished at 3503 for the trot.

Something horribly interesting I have noticed.  When a loser hits, there is a very good chance another will follow.  There are 13 losers, so for them to come back-to-back is mathematically "rare"--"strange".."difficult"..??  Anyway, it happens all the time.

This ebb and flow reminds me of a progression I invented years ago.  I may have to dust it off and try it.

Could I get a witness?

If there is absolutely no interest, I will just abandon the thread.

Sam

[Blood Angel]

Im always interested in what you have to say Sam.

[TwoCatSam]

So the thread will continue......

Thanks!

[vile]

Do that Sam,but would suggest when you lose a spin stop
/as those diablos comming in clusters usually couse are
neighbours on the wheel,in pairs/and continue after virtual
win.

[TwoCatSam]

Don't know what to make of this.  Never saw this on Dublin when playing by hand.  Now it pops up all the time since I'm using the "Redneck Robot".

[vile]

How do I open this Sam.

[TwoCatSam]

Opens fine for me.

All it says is

CANNOT LOCK BETS AT THIS TIME