Looking for a bet selection that doesn't win TOO much

[Colbster]

Ideally, wlwlwlwlw is correct.  The way I set it up with my version was that it could slowly trend wlwlwwlwwl:llwlwl to show a session bias that we would ultimately swap with the expectation for that bias to continue in the short- to medium- term and correct our imbalance.  I set my guidelines to pivot after 10 results out of balance and an end to the session if it ended 20 out of balance after the swap (In theory and frequently in practice, the +10 or -10 came back to 0 as the session bias corrected against itself which also was a good point to end the session).  The series you show would actually be quite adequate, allowing the progression to grow a little each direction and gain some decent profits when it swapped back the other direction.  However, a wlwlwlwlwl would be a money machine!

[D1]

Hi Colbster

try betting the DBL on any of the even money chances

that might give you what your looking for

D1.

[Colbster]

The DBL wins too much on a sustained streak for my needs. I need just as many losses as wins if possible. Thanks though!

[albertojonas]

The DBL wins too much on a sustained streak for my needs. I need just as many losses as wins if possible. Thanks though!

Choose a simple bet selection as Follow the Last, then bet after a win, on one side, after a loss on the other.
You would be surprised how balanced it gets.
Cheers.

[Ralph]

Choose a simple bet selection as Follow the Last, then bet after a win, on one side, after a loss on the other.
You would be surprised how balanced it gets.
Cheers.

You can get wrong timing with long chopping, which are half the patterns. I use to shift after two losses.
Most of the chops cancel each other then.

[keel44]

I got what your looking for. 

Just keep betting Red then Black over and over no matter what....... except zero.  In order for you to get a streak of Wins, you have got to be perfectly in synch with that specific alternation.  A long stretch of 1 color and you got WLWLWLWL.

[keel44]

Here is a stretch of random results.  I will start to bet High then Low.  I will show W/L only




23--W 
32--L 
23--W 
24--L 
35--W 
3--W 
13--L 
30--L 
35--W 
33--L 
36--W 
29--L 
4--L 
26--L 
17--L 
34--L 
32--W 
36--L 
22--W 
22--L 
34--W 
5--L 
24--W 
9--W 
27--W 
24--L 
34--W 
13--W 
12--L 
36--L 
0--L 
0--L 
18--L 
33--L 
28--W 
9--W 
16--L 
35--L 
31--W 
11--W 
12--L 
35--L 
15--L 
35--L 
28--W 
8--W 
16--L 
1--W 
27--W 
11--W 
10--L 
18--W 
5--L 
7--W 
23--W 
3--W 
25--W 
26--L 
11--L 
0--L 
28--W 
5--W 
33--W 
27--L 
19--W 
15--W 
27--W 
7--W 
11--L 
27--L 
7--L 
5--W 
3--L 
36--L 
20--W 
8--W 
21--W 
21--L 
35--W 
30--L 
21--W 
7--W 
29--W 
18--W 
22--W 
20--L 
35--W 
31--L 
3--L 
25--L 
2--L 
26--L 
18--L 
19--L 
24--W 
8--W 
18--L 
17--W 
7--L 
24--L

whew, I hope I didn't make any mistakes.  On the zeros, I just kept High then Low over and over

We had a stretch of 5 wins in a row and 7 losses in a row, but all in all, it seems pretty good.

[Colbster]

That is the same concept I have been working with, although I have been using chopping doubles BBRRBBRR with not consideration to what has happened in the past.  It wins with chops, streaks, and half of the doubles, plus a bunch of the random mishmash results that don't show any clear direction.  Thanks for confirming the direction I was going - that seems just about right!

[F_LAT_INO]

I know this sounds like what we don't want, but I need a bet that only wins about 50% of the time and not particularly streaky.  With the method I am working with (MM), I want my wL to be wLwLwLwLwLwL.  My problem is that when I find a winning bet, it wins too long at once such as LL::w and this is ruining what I am trying to accomplish.  Has anyone seen a bet method (specifically EC) that alternates winning and losing fairly consistently?

--This is what you need Colby......most sessions are like that...this one
longest run of los 4.....test some and you will see...except this is 5/4 bet

[Robeenhuut]

That is the same concept I have been working with, although I have been using chopping doubles BBRRBBRR with not consideration to what has happened in the past.  It wins with chops, streaks, and half of the doubles, plus a bunch of the random mishmash results that don't show any clear direction.  Thanks for confirming the direction I was going - that seems just about right!

Hola Colbster

It feels like you want to put us on      There is no such a thing that you are looking for. And contrary to a populary  belief i would not look for such a bet among EC's. If you want wild swings try any bet selections on double Dz's  flat of course  They even out but it takes forever.

Regards

[6th-sense]

hi again colbster how are you doing with this..i,ve been thinking about how to turn the dozen selection method to your advantage and i,ve come up with just using doz 1 and 3....the obvious reason is that its transferred to hi and low for your result..as before if a dozen hits 2 or more times wait for the same amount of misses then bet the corrospondent hi or low depending which doz it is...done a quick test of 3000 spins not actual bets and its pretty neck and neck...but slow.
i think one more alternative which would give quicker results is using the ro,re,bo,be registry...using  the same methods for dozens but betting opposite...ie if 2 red odds come out..wait 2 spins and bet the opposite on ec,s ie black and even...say 4 black evens came out wait 4 spins and bet the opposite red and odd...this kind of betting derives from a system i sort of wondered off from looking into something else....maybe it could be transferred to the double streets or lines but progression on any of these could be pretty high

[Stepkevh]

i have made an excel for this "roberebo" system added on the dozens and columns

[6th-sense]

which? is it excactly how i posted it?....using the results to bet on ec,s? if so cpould i have a link to see how it works?

[6th-sense]

ok here is a quick example of the ro,re,bo,be


numbers out are
10
12
31
33
26 this is our trigger to bet opposite the two bo,s ie 31, 33 in two spins as they are only two bo,s here
32 
2  is the result becouse we bet oppisite bo which is re we win our bet back on the even chance
4
2
36  is our next trigger as its broke the run of3 be,s..so we wait for 3 spins then bet oppisite
12
34
16 nxt spin we bet red .odd ie re
27 comes in and we win on both even chances.....is this how its programmed?


the original method was to match on the inside of the table the actual result...ie we wouldn,t bet oppisite but for...so if its red odd we would bet all the red odds on the table...test on this was also good flat betting...win to loss ratio...could you program excel for both of these? that would be good

[Stepkevh]

6s, here it is

in the second small square (like E2, I2, ) you can see on what the formula bets if a roberebo has fallen.
This is offcourse for the dozens and columns.

but i see that you look for something that bets the same.
so if RO falls you want to place bet for all RO's ?
idententical for all the rest.