I think this is abnormal! Opinions?

[Master_of_pockets]

I found something that was happening rare.
I was betting the oposite.
The betting was 2  2:1 bets(eg 2 dozens OR  2 Colums at once) CHANGE
When it was losing , I was betting 1 Dozen OR 1 Colum. RUN

So in most of the spins 2 chips bet and less of the spins 1 chip bet. All Flat betting
I faced 16 Zeros!
I was betting in every single spin.

Result :
900 spins
+47 chips

Is this normal?

[Master_of_pockets]

I completed 100 more betting spins and now I am in total 1000 bet spins.
The balance is higher/

1000 bets +59 chips

Please tell me is this normal?

[Master_of_pockets]

I am gonna get crazy!

1100 spins +65 chips
23 zeros

Can it be that the bet faced a veryyyyyyyyyyyy nice fluxuation?
Is this normal? LoL

[VLS]

The abnormal betting system is born 

The best way to tell is to throw a million spin to the method. If it survives, we know it *IS*  abnormal!



It is the only way my friend. Mind you, the author of Manucher's Hot Numbers (flat betting method) was up in great proportions... but yet we see it posted for a reason...

He boasted being a hardcore "math guy", with huge lengths of numbers crunched before considering something.



By all means do continue with your trials and may your method hold up to make these abnormal wins something normal 

Cheers!

[Bayes]

I am gonna get crazy!

1100 spins +65 chips
23 zeros

Can it be that the bet faced a veryyyyyyyyyyyy nice fluxuation?
Is this normal? LoL

To find the z-score we need the number of wins and the total number of bets. A little algebra will find the wins -

(1) W + L = 1100
(2) W - 2L = 65   (because you lose 2 units on each loss)

From (1), L = 1100 - W

Substituting this into (2) gives W - 2(1100 - W) = 65

Now solving for W gives W = 755

Now we can find the z-score:

z = (755 - 1100*0.6486) / sqrt(1100*0.6486(1 - 0.6486)) = 2.62

Pretty good, the chance is about 1 in 227. But time will tell as always. 

[Master_of_pockets]

Thanks for the nice answers.
I ll test mote today and I ll let you know about the results.

I am 99.9% sure that it was  a nice fluxuation that favoured my bet selection....maths are always right ,so when i will keep testing ,the ballance must go down.
1.100 spins isn t a little testing, and this is why I am curious.

But as a roulette researcher I have to continue testing to see the results in 3.000 spins.

Yes bayes I have also calculated that the advantage is close to ur calculation.

[Master_of_pockets]

I started the testing again from the spin that I stoped.
I tested 100 more spins and now I am at 1.200 spins.
In those last 100 spins it won +15 more chips.

I must call an ambulance to be stand by outside my house because I am afraid 

1.200 spins
+80
26 zeros

IF this bet selection will start losing badly after those 1200 spins , then this must be a big lesson to all of us.A lesson that show us what  things randomness is capable of doing.

[Master_of_pockets]

i tested 300 more spins. It lost -39 chips on those.
Total 1.500 spins +41 chips.

The -2.7 is started showing its face after 1.100 spins! What abnormal randomness can be?
I ll test more and let u know.

[Master_of_pockets]

1.800 spins and it started recovering.
Total +64
44 zeros

[Master_of_pockets]

1900 spins +59 chips(dropped a little)

[Master_of_pockets]

ATTENTION!

2.100 spins +79 chips

It recovered really good.

should I call the ambulance to leave or to stay put?

[Master_of_pockets]

Ok this isn t funny any more.

2.200 spins +85 chips. (there was a stage that is was +98)

[Master_of_pockets]

2300 spins +92 chips.(there was a stage that went to +98 chips)

I havet tested UNLIMITED flat bet selections in my life....This has never happened!

[Stepkevh]

and what is your bet selection exactly?

2 doz or cols and if that lost, 1 doz or col ?

[Master_of_pockets]

Yes Stepkevh

Ok 2.500 spins and the session numbers are finished.
It dropped to +67.

So 2.500 spins = +67 chips

I will continue testing with an other session numbers and I will reach 3.000 spins total.

Ps. I have a feeling from my testing observation that the bet selection can become even stronger if i will include one more bet inside it....but I need 1st to finish the 3.000 spins and If i am reasonable UP then I will start engineerinf the other part of the bet to see how it will go.