• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

The 3 to 1 bet and repeaters

Started by Ralph, Jul 31, 03:19 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Ralph

My play usually relay of bet for repeaters to show.
I think it is a good way, as I use to have some
good results,using it.

I did once a test over 2200 reapeater spins, betting
random, so I took the result from one table and
use it on the other table.

The result were not much different from chose
repeaters from the same wheel, but better than
using a random generator or a card deck.

It is mostly less than 10 numbers before a repeat,
but of course it can go to more than 25.

The bad runs can ruin the bankroll, if we at
any price try to win every sessions. Most of
the time a long progression save it, but in the
rare cases it will go bad, a lot are spoiled.

I use to go rather far, if I had a good streak otherwise,
and do not risk more than previous winnings the same day or so.
(its here I got both the biggest Winn's and loss).

Some methods can give good results on winnings, so
it is often better to recover in future spins.

Looking for repeater with other bets is not
uncommon. all betselections is based on numbers,
and if we bet on a doz expected to repeater, it
should be a maximum of expected repeaters in that
doz.

The table has three doz to chose with one chip,
and it is often a limited number expected as repeaters.

But a 3 to 1 bet we can find in thousends of
combinations. If you divide the bet value in 12,
i.e. instead of 0.12 euro we use 12 x 0.01 chips.

The last 12 numbers shown, are 12 numbers there
its more likely a repeater will show, than a doz
will be repeated (my option).
It is less tracking as well,waiting for a number of
hits in a doz, can take some spins.

More than half of the times the hit comes
in less than three spins.(more than 1000 trials , too few to be sure of this!).
Sometimes it hits first time many spins in a row.

I try first to use 100 units (between 0.01 to 1.0 Euro).
We never use bigger chips if we can not risk 1000 of them
1000 chips is a bankroll we need to stand some bad runs,
close up each other.

If we lose the first bet, rise to 2,if lose rise to 3.
You can even go to four, but its a matter of
choice in the situation. If you go to max three
you lose about 100, and that means you can lose
one out of four and still win good.

I have lost 5 times in a row at max, and recovered
the same day, and went plus.

I have got a net of  3000 units since 48 hours, and
the most down from high were less than 500 units.
A hit gain in average around 25.

My testing has mainly been on real play.
Every method where is a judgment in a situation
has to be done, can not be simulated in fun mode.
The method by it self can of course be tested
using any method, the most simple and realistic is
to note down the spins from a wheel and test them,
or play with free tokens, live or RNG.

If you try it, then please report the result.


The best way to fail, is not to try!

F_LAT_INO

--YOU GOT 3000 IN PAST 48 HOURS......congratulation,pressuming it is not
in virtual testings,but again you have said all your test are in real playing.
Well congratulation once more,especially winning on the 2/1...not 3/1 mate,
bets as you have described.......Bravo.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

Stepkevh

i suppose a 3/1 bet is 9 numbers then not 12.
Just call me Stef ... its shorter then Stepkevh :-)

Ralph

Yes I mix it up, I tested 12 and 9 as well. 12 is 2 x1.

It works very well for the moment, still winning.

Show the three last.
The best way to fail, is not to try!

ausjase

hey Ralph
Are you waiting for 12 numbers without a repeat ??
Cheers Jason

Ralph

Yes I take the last 12, I want to win at the repeate. ;D

I  include any repeaters, the last 12 numbers


The best way to fail, is not to try!

Stepkevh

progression ? 1 2 3 4 5 (maximum)
Just call me Stef ... its shorter then Stepkevh :-)

Ralph

Quote from: Stepkevh on Aug 01, 12:42 AM 2012
progression ? 1 2 3 4 5 (maximum)

Its a kind of personal choice, and bankroll, what risks and more.
I use to go to four, a loss of ca 100, which can be recovered in future spins.

Longer progressions use to work, but a real bad one can spoil a week or more.

I use a simular play on 2-ball wheel. Testing 3 numbers and double balls, seems to work for now.

2 last play on photos
The best way to fail, is not to try!

Ralph

I have been lucky, with winnings. Sometimes, I progress too high, haven't lost yet, but that will come, and then I will have a very big loss. I am now to test ways to avoid getting to high in the stakes.

When it works I win unbelievable much, but the risks is high, and a crash must be unavoidable any time.

I play since long time with won money, but they should  preferred to be retain.

The winnings are pure luck, I haven't got into the deepest hole yet, and have  a bankroll to defend the play but I had better to find other ways, take more small losses and more small winnings, avoid to be wiped out.

Fun to see more than 10000 units plus in a day, but I know this is not  sustainably.

The smartest has to just stop the game, but I am afraid I will not do so.

Had 1200 on the table desperate trying to catch up, it went well, but without an extremely luck several 1000 had been gone.
The best way to fail, is not to try!

-