CHALLENGE FOR ALL--must see and participate if you wana be winner-Yes SAM,it can

[Ralph]

A blind test over 1000, 10000 or more spins, even less have I done among people who think random on a wheel is different from RNG (both fair casinos), in not any case the test show, they could detect the difference.

In B&M you have just a few 100 spins a day, and on RND  easy 3000, so you see more, play more, win more and lose more.

[F_LAT_INO]

A blind test over 1000, 10000 or more spins, even less have I done among people who think random on a wheel is different from RNG (both fair casinos), in not any case the test show, they could detect the difference.

In B&M you have just a few 100 spins a day, and on RND  easy 3000, so you see more, play more, win more and lose more.

---lose more

[superman]

---lose more

Dont you mean lose faster, you'll lose the same only quicker

[F_LAT_INO]

don't you mean lose faster, you'll lose the same only quicker

---In your science fiction books.....but we don't play such rules....we are
   playing roulette on daily basis and you wouldn't know what it means
   until you try it.

[Shadowman]

If I was to lay odds I would bet that Superman is playing and winning every day, and I would suspect that it is on rng!

Mike

[F_LAT_INO]

If I was to lay odds I would bet that Superman is playing and winning every day, and I would suspect that it is on rng!

Mike

----Chance for me to earn new 1000 betting here......

[superman]

If I was to lay odds I would bet that Superman is playing and winning every day, and I would suspect that it is on rng!

----Chance for me to earn new 1000 betting here......

You would lose

[F_LAT_INO]

--Not first time though....but wouldn't you be in casino now if so.

[superman]

but wouldn't you be in casino now if so

I dont go to casinos, would rather sit watching the grass grow, RNG is wherever I am. 100 spins in 15 minutes, lovely jubbly.

[topcat888]

ok, at the risk of being flamed, here I go.!  I've played with what I thought were the rules and the results are not great.

First, I played the last nine splits to hit, on the next spin I would knock off the very last split and add the very latest split...  (obviously sometimes this would be less than nine splits because of repeaters ) Continue until a bet was lost then I would bet on the opposite splits, i.e. the ones that haven't been hit and increased the bet by +1...

I would keep betting on those and keep updating those splits, i.e. these are the splits that haven't been hit, so when one was hit that then becomes a hit split and is removed from the un-hit split list...  If you see what I mean...     When betting on those splits was lost I would switch back to the very latest set of splits, all the time adding one unit to each of the splits if the bet was lost or subtracting 1 unit if the bet was won...

I've attached the actuals and betting history in case anyone has the patience to check me out to see if there are mistakes..?

Cheers guys

[reveal]
5
20
15
1
18
35
23
34
6
21
6
0
7
6
13
35
16
9
36
24
1
23
6
26
21
11
29
5
34
22
11
10
9
23
27
33
20
22
2
33
20
23
4
16
25
8
21
20
12
8
8
12
4
29
8
24
15
24
13
26
15
33
28
29
19
17
25
17
30
20
23
22
33
4
11
26
27
11
31
9
22
36
23
36
18
11
34
20
33
12
7
5
13
19
32
24
28
5
24
10
12
18
20
34
2
0
10
8



[/reveal]

[TwoCatSam]

topcat

I haven't tried this, but I think you're doing it wrong.  I have studied it a lot and am planning to play it.

"First, I played the last nine splits to hit, on the next spin I would knock off the very last split and add the very latest split... "

As I understand it, as long as you win a bet on the newest nine, nothing changes.  You bet those again and again until you lose.  I don't understand the "knock off the very last split" part.

I don't think you have the progression right.  FLAT bets in blocks of 5, win or lose notwithstanding.  He looks at the last five.  If he went up a unit or more, he decreases the bet for the next five.  If he went down a unit or more, he increases the bet for the next five.  That is what the yellow blocks on his sheets are for....to block out five numbers.

I'm sure the FLATman will be along to add to this.

Sam

[topcat888]

Thanks Sam, I thought I was doing it wrong... 

[F_LAT_INO]

--Sam is right....you allways bet 9 spt.untill lose,then switch to other 9 splits/including the one that just lost/....in block of five as Sam said.

[topcat888]

Thanks FLAT... can I just confirm two things for me;

Am I right that every sixth spin you return back to the 'last' splits even if you are still wining on the furthest splits..??

Can you explain the progression again,  +1 if lost and -1 on a win..

[biagle]

Thanks FLAT... can I just confirm two things for me;

Am I right that every sixth spin you return back to the 'last' splits even if you are still wining on the furthest splits..??

Can you explain the progression again,  +1 if lost and -1 on a win..

no, after five spins you check if you are in plus or not.

lets say after 5 spins you are down 4 U, when you raise for next five spins your beting size to +1. After five spins you have  +2 U. Now you decrease your betting -1.

until lose,then switch to other 9 splits/including the one that just lost

i have a question for this part. lets say im betting 123456789 and now comes 10. I should bet 1/11/12/13/14/15/16/17/18 ? Somewhere in this theard is explained in this way.

Sorry for my english.