Intresting "Let it ride" Progression?

[Master_of_pockets]

Progression

1 1 1    2 2 2    3 3 3    4 4 4     5   5   5     6   6   6      7  7   7      8   8   8  etc.
2 2 2    4 4 4    6 6 6    8 8 8    10 10 10   12 12 12   14 14 14    16 16 16

Use your favourite Ecs bet selection and use the above progression.
When the 1st bet wins then bet the 2nd one  eg. 1-2 or 2-4 etc.(let it ride bets)
When the 1st or the 2nd bet loses move 1 step right in the progression table
When BOTH of the bets win move 3 steps back in the progression table 
When you are in a new profit move back to the 1st step of the progression.

I am sorry if this has been posted again...I have never seen it anyware.
I tested it in 1.500 bets and it is climbing very well.

[Master_of_pockets]

The progression above is the main concept .
But If you will use this progression that is posted in this post then the 1st bet is keeping some of the profit and may become even better.
Same rules as above.

1 1 1    2 2 2    3 3 3    4 4 4     5   5   5     6   6   6      7  7   7      8   8   8  etc.
1 1 1    3 3 3    5 5 5    7 7 7     9   9   9    11 11 11   13 13 13    15 15 15

Just to make it easier for you to be using this  2nd progression , when you will be betting the 1st bet and it wins , when the dealer is doubling the chips (because of the win) just take 1 chip away from the bet and keep it yours.Then let it ride.

In my opinion the bet selection must be always the same...because it is supposed that the more it loses the more will win later(deviation correction)
Any bet selections opinions?

[TwoCatSam]

Don't understand.

1 1 1
2 2 2

Think in terms of columns

1
2

Are you saying bet the 1 at the top of the column and if you win, bet the 2 below it?  If you lose both, move one to the right?

1 1
2 2

Same bet.  If you lose, move one to the right?

1 1 1
2 2 2

Sam

[Master_of_pockets]

Yes Sam

[TwoCatSam]

Thank you!

This might turn out very good!

Sam

[Master_of_pockets]

It s kind of the old boffin concept of let it ride.
But its safer with this way.

With the 2nd post progression the good thing is that because a lot of times the 1st bet wins and the 2nd loses , by keeping 1 chip it makes the losses less.....

So eg .   if we are in the step 6-11 and the 1st bet wins but the 2nd bet loses ,we haven t loss 6 chips but 5...this is helping building up profits underneath.

If anyone can suggest a nice bet selection then we can give it a test in all 3 Ecs at the same time and in a new profit we will always reseting the progression for all ecs to the 1st step

[Master_of_pockets]

An intresting bet selection to use with this progression may be the TBL(always bet the penultimate Ec)
In this case when we have a nice run trend or a chopping trend the progression will make good profits.(and it s also an every spin play).

In my opinion there no better bet selection or worst bet selections.
But if someone has noticed a bet selection that may help then it s good to post it here and try it out.

[Master_of_pockets]

I thought of a modification on the progression that will make it even safer-stronger.

We must move on 1 step to the right ONLY when the 1st bet loses.
And when the 1st bet is winning and the  2nd bet is losing we must remain to the same step of the progression.
The rest are the same...winning both bets is 3 steps to the left and in a new + we are reseting to the 1st step.

With a 200 chips BR we are Ok.

[GLC]

I thought of a modification on the progression that will make it even safer-stronger.

We must move on 1 step to the right ONLY when the 1st bet loses.
And when the 1st bet is winning and the  2nd bet is losing we must remain to the same step of the progression.
The rest are the same...winning both bets is 3 steps to the left and in a new + we are reseting to the 1st step.

With a 200 chips BR we are Ok.

Nice bet progression idea.
I have a question.  Doesn't you idea of only moving to the right after a loss on the 1st bet put you in the hole if you lose on the second bet?

On the 1st bet it's okay.  After that it looks a little dangerous.
For example, let's say you win the 4 unit bet but lose the 7 unit bet = -3, stay put and bet the 4 unit bet again and win and then lose the 7 unit part again and -3.  -3 X 2 = -6 and another win/lose =-9.

Just wondering?    I may be missing something.  At this age it's a fairly common occurance.

GLC

[Skakus]

If you go to my challenge page here link:://:.gigabean.co.uk/s_test.html you will find 3459 placed bets with the resulting wL registry.

There are 1743 wins & 1716 losses (and still growing).  They are REAL results so you could use them to test out this progression.

It looks good by the way. 

[Master_of_pockets]

Yes GLC I think you are right.
So we have to forget about staying to the same step.

Only a little modif on the 111 in order not to be a grind.

1 1 1
1 1 2

And from there we continue as the 2nd post progression.

[Ralph]

I have used a similar progression, stay as long you win, move one step on loss, reset to start on new high.

Played a lot of spins.  The method win or loose very little. Every time I  was using it I was some plus at least a while. If you want a few chips winnings, it may work well.

[Master_of_pockets]

Ralph from reading some posts of yours you seem like a person that has tested a lot of things in roulette.

thanks for the reply.

As for staying in the same step after a win , seems a little dangerous...but if some nice wins will occur the reset will be done in no time.

[Master_of_pockets]

I tested 747 spins by betting always the penultimate colour(bet every spin)
I used the progression in the 1st post.(always double after the 1st bet bet win)

19 zeros occured .

The result is +88 chips.
I faced a really really bad fluxuation of about 300 spins but in the end it got in a new +
max down -242 chips.

Here is the graph