@ turbo

[fossell]

I'll be honest. Im not convinced you do see the light. I don't believe its quite as simple as the information you've presented (which is what will wind people up ) But if you see something in information you 'haven't' presented, then good luck ;-)

I've noticed a few people here over the year 'convinced' they have it.

[nottophammer]

Betting 2's, 3s, 4s, - - - - - 10s,11s

Am i doing it right who knows, but i don't think it has set in stone rules, it's like GUT, decisions need to be made as the spins come.

Missing hits isn't the problem, getting hits is All that matters. I like that Eddy Ed be like Maestro ignore steve his stuck in his own little computer world

[Steve]

ignore steve his stuck in his own little computer world

Its called "reality". All you millionaires should come out of deludedville and see how everything really works.

[Steve]

No, it means i never play at the House Edge.

Ok so then you overcome it by changing the odds. Right?

[ayk]

Have a question to this timemashine theory. Lets take a cycle of 37 spins as our time cycle. After spin 37 I see in theory 24 numbers hit and 13 havent. Now I travel back to spin 1. As im not the smartest guy I forgot which 24 numbers will hit in the next 37 spins. BUT, and now comes my probably dumb question, why shouldnt I bet on the number which hit at spin 1? Lets say spin 1 #30 hit. Why on earth I should not bet #30 for the next 36 spins, as i know this number is in the pool of the 24 numbers which came up till spin 37? Sure I dont know if it will hit again, but isnt my chance 1/24 for the next 36 spins?

[TurboGenius]

Have a question to this timemashine theory. Lets take a cycle of 37 spins as our time cycle. After spin 37 I see in theory 24 numbers hit and 13 havent. Now I travel back to spin 1. As im not the smartest guy I forgot which 24 numbers will hit in the next 37 spins. BUT, and now comes my probably dumb question, why shouldnt I bet on the number which hit at spin 1? Lets say spin 1 #30 hit. Why on earth I should not bet #30 for the next 36 spins, as i know this number is in the pool of the 24 numbers which came up till spin 37? Sure I dont know if it will hit again, but isnt my chance 1/24 for the next 36 spins?

good post.
Some people don't understand that there's (on average) only 24 numbers that appear in a cycle - yet they continue to say the odds of winning are 1 in 37 (or 38) because they can't see past "each spin is independent from the last". Thinking on a "1 spin at a time" basis is probably the biggest thing keeping most people from winning.
Your #30 is now a "potential" repeater, unlike every other number on the table - they can appear (1 in 37 odds) but they can't be a repeater until they have shown at least once.
That makes #30 a potential repeater. Keep going with this line of thought that you posted and you'll find even more value in it than you do now.

[sniper]

Lets say spin 1 #30 hit. Why on earth I should not bet #30 for the next 36 spins, as i know this number is in the pool of the 24 numbers which came up till spin 37? Sure I dont know if it will hit again, but isnt my chance 1/24 for the next 36 spins?

Your chance is still 1/36. You are betting 1 out of the 24 numbers from the pool, you lose to the other 23 numbers,

Here you have 13 unhit, so there are 13 repeats in total. you chance of hitting one of the repeat is 1/13.

Therefore your actual chance of hitting is 1/36 in 36 spins (23+13).

Regards and Best wishes.

[denzie]

Testing this.

As far as I have read this:

Method in play is:

Don't bet on a number unless it has hit 2 times. Bet as many number's as long as they have hit 2 times. Once a number hit's the 3rd time stop betting the number's hit twice and bet numbers that hit 3 times till we get a number or number's hitting 4 times.

We re-start the process when we reach a spin count of 114 spins(38 x 3 cycles).
Are we flat betting or are we using a progression for this?
IF I am right, I can code this system, for you all to test. I have done this test in a different manner and it was a losing approach.
However, in real life, the story is different.

Its been coded. It lost. Save yourself the efford 

[jekhb76]

Have a question to this timemashine theory. Lets take a cycle of 37 spins as our time cycle. After spin 37 I see in theory 24 numbers hit and 13 havent. Now I travel back to spin 1. As im not the smartest guy I forgot which 24 numbers will hit in the next 37 spins. BUT, and now comes my probably dumb question, why shouldnt I bet on the number which hit at spin 1? Lets say spin 1 #30 hit. Why on earth I should not bet #30 for the next 36 spins, as i know this number is in the pool of the 24 numbers which came up till spin 37? Sure I dont know if it will hit again, but isnt my chance 1/24 for the next 36 spins?

It's not Crazy, you could. The only Crazy thing that can be done is to bet numbers that haven't showed. Remember, before there are 2s there Always must be a 1s First. Is it the best bet? I don't think so, but Always better then betting on unhit #ers.

[jekhb76]

Its been coded. It lost. Save yourself the efford 

Denzie is Right , it won't work.

[denzie]

Do i win every attempt? No. Do i win every session? Yes.

This i find amazing. I cant 

[Roulettebeater]

/quote]after many years of studing his thinking, let's see if i still remeber the most important stuff that he has said over the years.

Turbo's thoughts are quite simple........

01. He is only betting numbers that operate above expectation! SOLVED !
02. Keeping nr, 1 in mind, all numbers that haven't shown aren't bet! SOLVED !
03. Keeping nr, 1 in mind, all numbers that have shown only once, that are showing within expectation, aren't bet! SOLVED !
04. Don't think in a 37 spin cycle limit !
05. Numbers that were performing above expectation, but don't anymore, are dropped! SOLVED !
06. He is playing in a way that atleast ensures him that he is on the best possible numbers that he can be without knowing
    100% what's coming.
07. His wins makes up  for almost every losing bet that has been played - PROGESSION IS USED. SOLVED !
08. We need to focus on the MATH! - not the Wheel and certainly not the layout.
09. Turbo isn't playing at the house edge.
10. The anwser is there if we only think beyond 1:38 & 35:1 and the house edge on every spin.

enough to think about.


Ok, finally that's how turbo plays
I searched this information long time behave you guys keep talking and don't write headlines/points.

Anyway, if this true how turbo plays I can assure you that it's as worst as any other system.

[Roulettebeater]

This i find amazing. I cant 

You are a member on this forum since long time, haven't you managed yet to get yourself a HG?


Btw, I have reviewed some old threads and saw that there are a lot of members who are not any longer here, does that mean their admitted that roulette is waste of time and most importantly waste of money ?

[denzie]

You are a member on this forum since long time, haven't you managed yet to get yourself a HG?

A HG....nope. But i win 9 out of 10 sessions so how to name that ?

[jekhb76]

This i find amazing. I cant 

Turbo's quote, not Mine.