Quote from: VLS on May 19, 08:10 PM 20103 cycles at 1 single number (37 x 3 = 111 spins)

I still stand by 3 full cycles as a great spin window—viewed proportionally to the betting location.

Here's the breakdown:

• Even Chance = 2 spins → 2 x 3 = 6 spins
• Dozen / Column = 3 spins → 3 x 3 = 9 spins
• Double Street = 6 spins → 6 x 3 = 18 spins
• Corner / Quad = 9 spins → 9 x 3 = 27 spins
• Street = 12 spins → 12 x 3 = 36 spins
• Split = 18 spins → 18 x 3 = 54 spins
• Straight-Up (European) = 37 spins → 37 x 3 = 111 spins

American wheel values:

• Split = 19 spins → 19 x 3 = 57 spins
• Straight-Up = 38 spins → 38 x 3 = 114 spins

The idea here is respecting proportionality: whatever the target bet, measuring in its particular spin cycles keeps things consistent.

Cheers!
Vic

This type of multi-system betting is still very much alive!

I recently mentioned on RouletteIdeas how Ophis' MST and the Zechnas' methodology are somewhat similar, with this about the latter:

Quote from: VLSThere are systems that regularly reach +1 or more at any point during standard play conditions. That's the sweet spot to lock in a win and switch systems—then it's "rinse & repeat."

Having a multi-system situational strategy with a positive exit point per each system is worth considering, even if it's just one single unit in the plus—definitely more sound than the traditional "all or nothing" approach so often seen at the tables... the old habit of playing down to the last chip!

Personally, I find such multi-system approach far more reasonable.

Cheers! 
Vic

It was MumboJumbo, also nottopharmer, vaddis and now Interceptor, you naughty one.
MoneyT was right " Roulette simulator, roulette rng, roulette table... doesn't matter where you play as long as it's random. "

Who posted #227. Mumbo, interceptor or even nottopharmer, anyway.
16 pages and anyway further forward?

A few interesting things to note.
Assassination attempt on trump - correct
Trump win - correct
Economic crash - correct
Trump weeping - 
Dark clouds - ?

There was one forum member that I don't completely respect (maybe because I know him for too much time) and often our discussions ended in a very negative way, but his honesty, dedication and ambitions always attracted me.

however once he said:

QuoteTime to convert wondering to practice, wondering for 10 years didn't help))

Have a nice day everybody! 

Let it sink in LOL

Out of interest? Really?

Let's wait till someone will post more...lol

Great stuff about variance Gogi! Thanks

I made some stats for the "Variance options" to see if it holds constant over different permutations of spins like cycles. And it's not))

(Small remark: I felt like it wasn't the right thing to do, but I just can't pass without testing some "out of the box" ideas with "yet another system recipe". "Yet another system recipe" method from priyanka helps a lot in finding "run from hell" for any system you are about to lose your money with)))

Dozens:

100spins (6sets)

0V 14  8  21  5  9  14
1V 42  35 45  34. 32 34
2V 36. 42 29. 45. 41 36
3V 8.  15 5.  16. 18 16

1000s
0V 130
1V 377
2V 370
3v 123

Lines

1000spins (2 sets)

0V 9  28
1V 78 115
2V 225 240
3V 327 295
4V 249 215
5V 95. 90
6V 17. 17

So not so "constant" but very biased)))
Now I wonder what will happen when I put it all in the oven and bake it with a pitch of cycles and some order)

Time to convert wondering to practice, wondering for 10 years didn't help))


(During my test I found that instead of 25/75 ratio for V0V3/V1V2 roulette can easily produce 37/63 and 41/59.

So pay attention on where and why you are "flushing" your money, fellas!

Have a nice day, everybody!

It seems nottopharmer that you and I are the only ones researching rng, that's why we succeeded in that mission, we went to a higher level of roulette playing, and that's a big advantage over other players because the future is rng.