• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Every system can win in the short-term. It just depends on the spins you play.

Recent posts

#1
General Discussion / Re: Let’s chat …
Last post by alexlaf - Today at 11:06 AM
Simple idea using totto!

Lets say I create my table 9x4 and I get my first result  #21 and go like this for 37 spins , as we have 37 spins and 9 sets that is like 4.1 per raw! It is dynamic!

#2
General Discussion / Re: Let’s chat …
Last post by MoneyT101 - Today at 10:45 AM
Quote from: alexlaf on Today at 10:17 AMI can't see why is bad to (wait) when we have dependence, don't we count those virtual bets?

Ok so there should always be units on the table, but I guess it depends on what you are trying to accomplish.

I'm working on an ec only method for baccarat and it requires a lot of virtual betting. Sometime there is a bet on both sides but even still there is always a bet with units on the table since one side might have an extra unit.

If it's 1 unit on each side then no bet.  But that situation is rare with DS, quads, streets, splits, straights
#3
General Discussion / Re: Let’s chat …
Last post by alexlaf - Today at 10:17 AM
Quote from: MoneyT101 on Today at 10:08 AMCreating dependent events + php = winning sequences
I can't see why is bad to (wait) when we have dependence, don't we count those virtual bets?
#4
General Discussion / Re: Let’s chat …
Last post by MoneyT101 - Today at 10:08 AM
Quote from: Blueprint on Today at 07:54 AM2736

2+7+3+6=18. OMG it's half!

idk why I found this so funny

There's so many possibilities that I would just believe if you found an angle and it's working for you, just continue to use it!

There's something about all this 2736 units talk, I'm hesitant to share openly.  So I'll just share it this way.

Creating dependent events + php = winning sequences
#5
General Discussion / Re: Let’s chat …
Last post by alexlaf - Today at 08:16 AM
Quote from: Blueprint on Today at 07:54 AM2+7+3+6=18. OMG it's half!

1+8=9
#6
General Discussion / Re: Let’s chat …
Last post by Blueprint - Today at 07:54 AM
2736

2+7+3+6=18. OMG it's half!
#7
General Discussion / Re: Let’s chat …
Last post by alexlaf - Today at 06:03 AM
Playing main an derived we have unique and unhit, what if we add a second stream based on this!

A. -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, +30
B.  0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, -30

If this is one 38 spins session
|_______|

then another session could overlap it like so:
|_______|
|_______|

main and positional is 1368x2 =2736
#8
General Discussion / Re: Let’s chat …
Last post by 6th-sense - Today at 02:55 AM
all the above is why dyslexic is telling you that its the max bankroll needed and you cannoy lose it...as that would mean no repeats anywhere across the board...you also have to remember he always used an ec bet in conjunction with his play...the question for you is how
#9
General Discussion / Re: Let’s chat …
Last post by 6th-sense - Today at 02:32 AM
so true blueprint...you have a better explanation ?...

re read carpdiems post...before you discount it i would say look a bit deeper into what i posted what and where the other balance states come from
#10
General Discussion / Re: Let’s chat …
Last post by Blueprint - Yesterday at 06:32 PM
Confirmation bias in action