The probability of 13 random numbers appearing at least once within 3 spins is:
72.70842793121828%

Your bet selection offers no advantage in that respect.

If you want to do the math yourself it is:
1 - 24/37^3

I would like to explain again what does the info below means, delta is the gap between two consecutive hits, for example

Delta 0 means there is no gap, this is when we have WW
Delta 1 means there is one step gap, this is when we have LW
Delta 2 means there is two steps gap, this is when we have LLW


Delta count.  Percentage
———————————-
0       2687     35,808
1       1688     22,495
2       1136     15,139

So within my betselection, the probability of a hit appearing at least once within 3 spins is:

35,808 + 22,495 + 15,139 = 73,442%

imho,
no need to argue that random cant or can be read,
we focus on what must happen, and averages of hit, and the least ever hit.
streak of 2win, streak of 3 hit,
MUST HAPPEN,
we need to know the averages of hit, and the worst least ever hit, then build a progression mm around them

I didn't say I don't believe anyone is winning using your strategy, only that if they are it's not because trends work. Trends in random numbers can only be identified after the event.

Fine. The people that use trends combined with winning phases will just take the money and be sorry that they were wrong. This disagreement will never be settled by changing anyone's opinion with just words or ideas. It will take evidence. First I show how to do it. Next comes people learning it. Then comes a shocked world once they see the body of evidence.  You believe that this will never happen because it hasn't happened already. So I will wait and not be concerned about how long it takes.

I can't teach people that 3 net wins is smarter than larger amounts. I can suggest that this small amount is well inside the moving averages for even chance bets though. Self control is part of the skill. I didn't have it until I discovered these "moving average" concepts. I needed to see it visually in graphs before I got it. I know Reading Randomness instinctively, yet I struggled for years with self control. 

No , they have not. He's a scammer who's good with words but cant win this game.

Of course he can prove me wrong by beating the game provided here. No words but Actions 

I love it when someone tells me I have to prove something the way that they insist. I'm sending you an army of people that will all prove it to you.

Denzie,

I don’t believe that there is systems that win flatbet!
The progression has its own risk

The HG edge is not 70% right ? Its actually very small. So if you in fact can predict better accuracy ( even a little bit) you can beat the Wheel with flatbet.