Grassroots offspring....raymanz tweak

[MrG]

Hello, I was curious about this method so I tested it for a few hundreds of thousands and millions of no zero generated spins. Sometimes it ends in plus sometimes in minus. But if it ends in plus it makes about 1 unit per approximately 800 spins. There are about twice as many wins than losses. I used 1, 3, 9 progression, played only on dozens.

[RouletteGhost]

Hello, I was curious about this method so I tested it for a few hundreds of thousands and millions of no zero generated spins. Sometimes it ends in plus sometimes in minus. But if it ends in plus it makes about 1 unit per approximately 800 spins. There are about twice as many wins than losses. I used 1, 3, 9 progression, played only on dozens.

Betting against a unique when it occurs

Triggers
123
132
213
231
312
321
??

Mini games of 3 on a win wait for the 3 to finish?

Very important. When you see unique bet against. If win on spin 1 sit out next 2 spins. Then wait for next unique to appear

[MrG]

Betting against a unique when it occurs

Triggers
123
132
213
231
312
321
??

Mini games of 3 on a win wait for the 3 to finish?

Very important. When you see unique bet against. If win on spin 1 sit out next 2 spins. Then wait for next unique to appear

Yes, playing only after unique, so after the abovementioned triggers and waiting for those three to be finished. So for example if there are spins 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1. The spins 1, 2, 3 are trigger, the game starts at spin with value 2 from the following 3 spins, this is a win. For the rest of those spins it is not played/bet. But because also spins 2, 3, 1 are trigger on next spin it is played against this trigger.

[mogul397]

3 tests against previous 3....only when unique

bravo ray for a nice tweak to grassroots

no losses at all so far

fewer betting opportunities but more confidence

I don't know how true to form these results are. Or if other results
posted more recently are more representative, but logically, these
results follow exact stats. I mean that there is a 2-1 ration where if
you bet flat, you'd be even.  1/3 of the losses are on the 3rd columb
cancelling out the wins on the first two.

So it troubles me. Even though I have more confidence in this method than
that.

[RouletteGhost]

I don't know how true to form these results are. Or if other results
posted more recently are more representative, but logically, these
results follow exact stats. I mean that there is a 2-1 ration where if
you bet flat, you'd be even.  1/3 of the losses are on the 3rd columb
cancelling out the wins on the first two.

So it troubles me. Even though I have more confidence in this method than
that.

Bet against previous 3 dozen formation only when unique

Mini games of 3

1 3 9

Stop on a win and wait til next trigger of unique 3 in chart

Thats how i tested it. Zumma

[Orochi]

Grassroots offspring....raymanz tweak
TESTED IN EXCEL

[Orochi]

Fixed the pattern to play "3,2,1" missing

[RouletteGhost]

1st two pages of american zumma

83 spins

these are all the unique dozen formations followed by the next 3 spins. i just picked the uniques i saw and what followed

123                   followed by
112 (bet against 123, win on 2nd step of prog)

231                   followed by
313 (bet against 231, win on 1st step of prog)

132                   followed by
311 (bet against 132, win on 1st step of progression)

312                  followed by
233 (bet against 312, win on 1st step of prog)

123                  followed by
313 (bet against 123, win on 1st step of prog)

321                  followed by
311 (bet against 321, win on 2nd step of prog)

132                  followed by
113 (bet against 132, win on 2nd step of prog)

not too bad. 7 triggers in 83 spins, all won. no unique repeated. yet