Higher BR?

[winkel]

Mr. J,

short answer: If they donÃ,´t stop in any Plus, they will end up at the same in the long run.

But all my arguments donÃ,´t fit EC.
You have to choose a chance that has a special drive. It has to pay "more" in a win than you bet. Only under this conditions a shorter winning streak can equalize a longer losing streak!
And only with a higher payout it makes sense to switch to a "winning" bet.
With EC you just switch from losing to losing or winning to winning and the chance always keeps you at 1:1.

e.g. you see a doz sleep so you can jump on a winning streak of the other two and with a winning progression or paroli you can rewin your losses.

br
winkel

[6th-sense]

as i said before its the sysyem or strategy, u would not bet a 40 stage progression on a doz for a good system or strategy the matrix vertical has good results and only limited progression and losses by acounts so with these strategies in mind you bet bigger units 

[winkel]

Sorry,
I havenÃ,´t read the matrix-system.

br
winkel

[6th-sense]

its pretty interesting you want to spend a bit of time reading through it...i do understand though what you are getting at but i think its just the perspective of who ever reads and reply,s to your post...in the end its all about a good strategy and what you are prepared to lose and win within the table limits that you can access