An effort to help some members get out of the worst gambing fallacy

[Bayes]

We are all operating within the confines of GF. The only one's outside this are those are usng advanced physics based bet selections, and flat betting those selections.

For the rest of us roulette players, playing a game with negative expectation, we are trapped in the world of GF. Make the most of it or shut up and get out.

Agreed. Anyone using roulette systems, and that includes all MM can't ever get a mathematical advantage. The odds are fixed and there's nothing we can do about it. If you're not committing GF then it's some other kind of fallacy - it's unavoidable.

MOP, I don't know why you persist with roulette if the HA bothers you so much. You have abandoned advantage play because you say the opportunities don't exist any more, so you're stuck with fallacies - you know that. Beats me why you don't play some other game where the odds aren't fixed, like poker, sports betting or forex trading.

The thing is, you want to have it both ways. You attack other members for believing in fallacies but you post systems yourself which commit them. That makes you a hypocrite. 

[Ralph]

One sure way to win is to put a negative bet on an on line casino, and as it is more easy to lose than win, the casino will more often subtract a negative amount from your total.

[F_LAT_INO]

So Flat what's a minimum bet in your online croatian casino? I understand that you
stopped playing B&M casinos.  Is your main method still a sector or split method?

--It is not on line casino but automated casino with couple of airball roulette machines.
  I only follow any repeaters/and many of these/and don't need a spreadsheet couse
  am having display of last 20 numbers.Actually it is rather habit and entertainment
  with no real serious play or any wish to win any large money....but do have a satisfaction
  and enjoyment when I walk out as a winner each morning/yes few morning hours/as said
  previously earning my daily needs.Years have done its natural procedure.

[F_LAT_INO]

The thing is, you want to have it both ways. You attack other members for believing in fallacies but you post systems yourself which commit them. That makes you a hypocrite. 



---Lucky have just read this......as was going to say something similar...thk.Bayes
 
   By profession MOP supposed to be instructor/fitness/--maybe he wana be here also.

[Turner]

--Was clear as could be....I do not play any longer B&M casino couse can not last nights,
  but to be a winner on constant basis one needs 30000......and for you Turnerf...
  18 euro in my country quite enough for daily needs.....in other words I'm only playing
  these days entertaining myself as am pensioner.Hope you got it clear now...o by the way.Turner
  sarcasam doesn't suits your style...and F_LAT_INO don't lie as you suggested in other thread,
  but never mind one gets to know each other better.

Sorry Flatino....sarcasm is 90% of english humour. With everyones english being so excellent I forget people here are from other countries.

[Drazen]

This pic is for some of you guys here 

It just couldnt be said better!

Cheers

Drazen

[Master_of_pockets]

"""Agreed. Anyone using roulette systems, and that includes all MM can't ever get a mathematical advantage. The odds are fixed and there's nothing we can do about it. If you're not committing GF then it's some other kind of fallacy - it's unavoidable.

MOP, I don't know why you persist with roulette if the HA bothers you so much. You have abandoned advantage play because you say the opportunities don't exist any more, so you're stuck with fallacies - you know that. Beats me why you don't play some other game where the odds aren't fixed, like poker, sports betting or forex trading."""

i agree. but Hit and Run is a mathematical fallacy and its the worst.
Randomness falacy(a bet selection may be due) is a fallacy that doesn t involve hight school simple maths.

If you accept 100% that randomness can t produce a bet selection better then the others(this is what we all are seaching) then all forums should be out of bussiness

[Mare]

This pic is for some of you guys here 

It just couldnt be said better!

Cheers

Drazen

Absolutely Drazen

This is a great truth, but unfortunately people are not aware of it

By the way

Pay attention to the sentence below ...

[marvin]

it seems like this is turning into SCIENCE VS RELIGION kind of thing

[MrJ]

Ummmm, whether you like it or not, members here have the RIGHT to politely discuss/test (etc.) methods without being picked on or harassed.
Its pretty darn rare for method guys to insult non-method members but if its the other way around? Well, we all know the answer to that. I'll help out the non-method guys....."methods suck, don't play them".

That's out of the way at least until December??

Ken

[Tamino]

Ken,


Why December? Are you waiting for  SNOW. Man  !.
LOL

Tamino

[Turner]

my 2 peneth....
MOP...nice post mate.
Its common sense, most of it: Beginers will listen and take it on board, but experienced roulette players will ignore common sense if it gets in the way of their belief that they can beat the casino all the time.

It doesn't matter too much if Flat_ino is winning or losing or completly lying to us all. What matters is that he enthusiastically posts up strong ideas for us to play with or reject. Just my view.

Turner

.
FLATINO...i didnt call you a liar, read again. Its a subtle thing in the English.

[F_LAT_INO]

Well MOP and likes you.
I have a suggestion for you,rather a challenge.


Will take you on with 50 real playing sessions,over 300 hundred spins,
of your choice.


Bet you that I will win them all playing my way.


There is a chance for you to win/as much as you wish/some money.


----But I believe that even after such venture/where am sure to win/
    you will be still saying maths can't allow you to beat roulette.


---BR is stronger then any maths.

[Ralph]

There is one 100% method to carry home a million from the casino!


(bring two and lose half of it).


A large bankroll can put the loss beyond all reasonable chances of a loss, its still there, but microscopic.
The loss will if it ever comes not be small.

They stake a dollar and bring 50 or 100, need hell of a luck to win.

[Tamino]

Ralph,


You are correct  with  your formula how  to leave the casino  with one million  !

Tamino