Dyksexlic

[Badger]

 Is anybody still studying Dyksexlics clues?
If so, could I study with them?
No, I’m not Dyksexlic unless he’s relocated to South Africa

Regards
brucenelson@webmail.co.za

[superman]

Howzit ek se, nah, Me and Vicotr did give it a bash a few years ago, I still have the code I coded but it eventually gets too risky, hence I did not follow it much further, tried a few different approaches but it didn't do what it said on the blik so it's been filed.

[Nickmsi]

Hi Badger . . .

I looked into Dyksexlic about a year ago.

Will contact you via email and see if any of my studies can help you.

Cheers

Nick

[GLC]

I don't remember what Dyksexlic's puzzle was, but I have a series of clues written down in my notes from a few years ago.


It's supposed to be the clues to the Holy Grail.  Here they are.


1.  It's a 4 bet combo


2.  Not all the bets are even chance bets,but all the bets are outside bets.  (No streets)


3.  There is at least 1 column


4.  You have 16 winners that pay 2 units


5.  You have 16 losers of on 1 unit


6.  You have 4 losers of 4 units


7.  See if you can predict when the losers are coming


8.  Betting 2 columns & 2 dozens you can find a trigger based on the last spin or the penultimate spin


9.  Betting 3 before last on an even chance might be helpful.


I'm not sure that numbers 7, 8 & 9 aren't decoys to throw us off.


All I've got to say is if we ever get #7, game over.  We win with any system if we can do this.




That's all I've got and I don't remember where it came from.  I don't know any more than what I wrote above, so I can't really answer any questions.


Maybe if some of you guys who have a doctorate in roulette can work together and see if there's anything here.


GLC

[Badger]

 @Superman : Hoeziiit
@GLC : Wow, I have’nt seen any of those clues before!

I’m not trying to start a discussion of Dyksexlics bet as we all know how
that’s going to end.
I’m trying to meet forum members who think that Dyksexlic  has a HG and would like to solve it . I enjoy solving puzzles.

My opinion of Dyksexlic is that he is articulate, has a higher education, probably in maths, and has a very sharp mind. Unfortunately, as Babs once wrote, he has a burden to prove himself to his naysayers, rather than to those who are interested in his methods.

I understand his choice of not wanting to reveal his method. After all, if one could pick gold up in the streets, it would have no value, would it.  One only has to look at the game of blackjack and what Thorpe’s book did to those who used card counting as a living.

I think that many people misunderstand his clues. For example : many people think that his system uses a progression until it hits a repeater , but he clearly states that he is not waiting for an event, he’s method is a process.

Regards
Bruce

[teo]

I don't remember what Dyksexlic's puzzle was, but I have a series of clues written down in my notes from a few years ago.


It's supposed to be the clues to the Holy Grail.  Here they are.


1.  It's a 4 bet combo


2.  Not all the bets are even chance bets,but all the bets are outside bets.  (No streets)


3.  There is at least 1 column


4.  You have 16 winners that pay 2 units


5.  You have 16 losers of on 1 unit


6.  You have 4 losers of 4 units


7.  See if you can predict when the losers are coming


8.  Betting 2 columns & 2 dozens you can find a trigger based on the last spin or the penultimate spin


9.  Betting 3 before last on an even chance might be helpful.


I'm not sure that numbers 7, 8 & 9 aren't decoys to throw us off.


All I've got to say is if we ever get #7, game over.  We win with any system if we can do this.




That's all I've got and I don't remember where it came from.  I don't know any more than what I wrote above, so I can't really answer any questions.


Maybe if some of you guys who have a doctorate in roulette can work together and see if there's anything here.


GLC
[/quote


According to all that,may guess would be;

Col.1+2+red+high
Col.1+3+black+low

[TwoCatSam]

Just playing the advocate here...........

Did he ever show one shred of proof that he could do anything?

Sam

[GLC]

 @ Teo,  I've thought about your suggestion and it doesn't satisfy all the criteria.  Meaning the 16 numbers that win 2 units, 16 numbers lose 1 unit and 4 number win 4 units.  Betting on 2 dozens and 2 columns satisfy the criteria if you're playing on a no-zero wheel.  But if you're playing on a single zero wheel, then you will have 5 numbers that lose 4 units.


It could be that we have to bet different size bets on the different bet locations.


I have a feeling this is an exercise in futility if he has to throw in #7 as a caveat.


Thanks for giving us your thoughts though.  Any idea might supply the element that leads to the solution.

@ Sam.  The answer to your question is, "I don't think he did."  As my memory drifts in and out of being trustworthy, I seem to remember that this was posed by a guy named Charles.  Seems like there was a lot of controversy a few years back regarding his claims on his web site about being able to beat roulette.

GLC

[Badger]

 â€œDid he ever show one shred of proof that he could do anything?”

The only way he could prove anything would be to reveal the bet to another forum member, who could then verify the facts.
He obviously did not trust anyone.

I still think ”there’s gold in them thar hills”

[TwoCatSam]

He could do as I have done:  Make a movie showing only the Euro amount at the casino.  He could play in complete secrecy, but we could see the Euro amount constantly going up.

People......

Really, all we need to see is that a person can make money!  Just show us the Euro screen!  If he could do what he says he could do, he would be happy to show us 100 E going to 200, then 400, then 800 and so on.

But, challenged, most folks say, "Oh, I can't play on line."  Or, "Oh, BetVoyager cheats!" 

Folks, Leo Kottke did not spend years learning guitar to say, "Oh, it's windy out!  I can't play."  Google "Vaseline Machine Gun" and listen to it. 

Ok, I'm bloviating!  Sorry....

TwoCat

[TwoCatSam]

By the way.......for those who say, "I don't have to prove anything to anyone.", then why open your mouth in the first place?  This guys been gone for ages and we're still talking about him.  He's probably on here now under a new name.

That's another thing:  I'm TwoCatSam all over the net.  Not one other name.  Why does everyone need a basket load of names?

The "Darn Near Holy Grail" is on these forums.  It loses sometimes, but it makes money.  Over time, it makes money!  Not one thing to do with me, I'm sorry to say!

Oops!!  There I go again....

Samster

[Steve]

As I recall he was actually john legend/fender using yet another fake name. Notice the same pattern he followed? Loves to string people along for amusement. You will only waste time with him, but you're free to try.

[Skakus]

As I recall he was actually john legend/fender using yet another fake name. Notice the same pattern he followed? Loves to string people along for amusement. You will only waste time with him, but you're free to try.

As I recall diksukmy was way more clever than JL/fender, more like greatgrampa. 

[TwoCatSam]

Skakus

Some clariication:  Are you lumping GG into the same class as Jl/Fender/dykitchy?

Surely not. 

Sam

[teo]

He could do as I have done:  Make a movie showing only the Euro amount at the casino.  He could play in complete secrecy, but we could see the Euro amount constantly going up.



TwoCat

Sam,


But he did something else instead/probably you aren't aware since you were guitar playing/opened
new web site,and scam ppl.for over 400 k to join his club of winners.