Dyksexlic

[ddarko]

@ teo

Where on earth did you get that 400k figure from please ?

[teo]

--I didn't but other ppl.estimated so on those forums...especially
scammed ones....according to them it was about 800 euros to
become a member of the winning club x 500 ppl....he was planning
doing it for more then 5 years.....that is a real sign of pro conman.

[TwoCatSam]

teo

No, I didn't know that.  I'm amazed, shocked and appalled.

Bet he keeps a low profile!!  KnowwhutImean?

Sam

[ddarko]

thxs for answering my question Teo 

I know people who applied think it was about 350 euros ish...

How about a different slant on this ?

I have no insider knowledge or anything like that, this is only a possibility.....

For starters, the fee was to apply to the club, not to become a member. Therefore like it or not, I don't think he has done anything illegal.

His Uk (not a ropey off shore acc) was on the website, if he has conned people no doubt somebody would have gone all the way & reported him.

May the club does exist & the best way for the trail to go cold, is to let EVERYBODY think he's a conman 

I have no idea, it's just a possibility......

[amk]

Hello everyone! : )


Take a look at the first post in this link....... #35


link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?action=profile;u=731;area=showposts;start=30

[Proofreaders2000]

I wished there were more clues. 

[amk]

Have you read all his posts Proof, quite fascinating if nothing else.

Take a look at post #14......

[ddarko]

looking at those posts he sure comes across as Wendal....

[Proofreaders2000]

Let me try this.

Track until you have collected either 10 low unique or 10 high unique
numbers since the start of the session. (Whichever comes first during tracking.)

Of those 10 low (or high) numbers count how many are even
or odd.  The lesser of the two will be your playing numbers.

Here's the pigeonhole part.  Bet each playing number continuously as it shows (waker).
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(That was my best shot)*hope it helps

[amk]

Hello d darko (cool name : )


Vic could confirm the IP addresses 

[amk]

That's amazing stuff Proof.


A major development/advancement into understanding this concept.


I think we are chipping away at the riddle....


There is a chance, 50/50 (without the zero : ) that Dyksexlic is actually correct.....

[ddarko]

@ amk thxs it's a cool film  & yes maybe vic could.....

@ Proof

IF there is a bet out there I'm 100% sure it's a simple one, & what you posted is sure simple so who knows 

[TwoCatSam]

I'd really love to have that "pigeon hole" thingy explained fully.

I know two pigeons can't get on the same egg, but what does that have to do with where the ball lands.

Is he saying the ball can't land twice in the same spot?  We all know better than that!

Sam

[VLS]

I'd really love to have that "pigeon hole" thingy explained fully.

If you have 9 holes and 10 pigeons, you know a pigeon will enter a hole which is already occupied:



It doesn't correlate directly to roulette since you have 37 holes and only one pigeon (ball) 



Then the other way is to try to "force-fit" it into roulette using an analogy instead; the 37 holes being 37 spins... This way, by spin #38 you have 100% certainty the ball must have fallen into a pocket (hole) twice.

It's pretty much like you having a pajama with two (2) pockets and me wagering that should you stick your hand 3 times in your pajama's pockets, you will repeat one of the pockets for sure   


You can be 100% certain of that 

[Badger]

For starters, the fee was to apply to the club, not to become a member.
I tend to agree with you ddarko.
Dyksexlic and CEH are 2 different people.
CEH claimed to have a consistant winning bet and and he would never play RNG.
Dyksexlic has a 100% winning bet played only on RNG.