Count 5

ddarko · Jan 18, 09:36 AM 2014

Quote from: ignatus on Jan 18, 04:08 AM 2014
I come with facts. and still you want to argue and put me down? The results are obvious... that you have some personal agenda against me is not my problem, it's yours.

Are you either of this kind of person ignatus ?

1. You were never told "No" as a kid & are never wrong......

2. Your IQ is about 189 your a genius but have zero social skills like Dr.Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory?

Because if you keep on poking the Bear (iggiv in this case) with the comments quoted above he WILL bite back.....

ignatus · Jan 18, 09:40 AM 2014

I don't need this kind of gossip (i know you love it) but please try to keep to the topic here.

ddarko · Jan 18, 09:53 AM 2014

Quote from: ignatus on Jan 18, 09:40 AM 2014
I don't need this kind of gossip (i know you love it) but please try to keep to the topic here.

as you wish, everything all the other guys have posted will be proved correct.

I may make this post a template to save time later on

ignatus · Jan 18, 10:04 AM 2014

Quote from: ddarko on Jan 18, 09:53 AM 2014
as you wish, everything all the other guys have posted will be proved correct.

yes, and then you forgot to take a look at BW results. mine also, i have done over 2000 spins now, not busted so far.

more tests (from livespins):

ddarko · Jan 18, 10:07 AM 2014

Your using a marty progression mate, it's doomed from the start for that reason alone.....

Not for the first time, try flat betting & looking for a reason WHY your bet selection should work

eddy35 · Jan 18, 10:09 AM 2014

Just tested 10.000 spins for fun. I hope you get it, Ignatus.

ignatus · Jan 18, 10:25 AM 2014

ok, im defeated. Thanks folks, i tried and i failed yet another time....if there is anything to "save" this method then is to figure out a stoploss and another progression, if possible. i haven't tried flatbetting, but i doubt that would work

iggiv · Jan 18, 10:39 AM 2014

Ignatus, i have nothing personally against you. You are not better and not worse than anyone. I am trying to help keep here more or less order, and you with your flooding threads you tend to disturb this order causing complaints of the members of the forum when they start to see your threads only. So we agreed that you post most of your numerous threads in notepad, and you were OK with that. Now you start arguing again.

Ignatus, if u keep arguing and messing with the order of this forum --- i will start banning you, i am warning you. You already built yourself some kind of reputation here, so everyone knows that i have no personal issues with u and the problem is with your personality only.
And i try to as nice as possible, but sometimes i have no choice but reacting.

I would not react at all if i did not get signals from some members of the forum.

ignatus · Jan 18, 10:43 AM 2014

alright

ddarko · Jan 18, 10:48 AM 2014

Quote from: ignatus on Jan 18, 10:25 AM 2014
ok, I'm defeated. Thanks folks, i tried and i failed yet another time....if there is anything to "save" this method then is to figure out a stoploss and another progression, if possible. i haven't tried flatbetting, but i doubt that would work

I wasn't saying flat betting would work with this method, I was saying the general.....

Believe it or not members here are trying to help you. No doubt they get frustrated when you don't listen and that's why you get the odd arsey reply.

& BTW your not defeated, you lost a battle not the war......

iggiv · Jan 18, 10:51 AM 2014

Ignaus i hope very much that we understood each other and there will be no need for harsher means. Thank you. As long as you
think about others (not only about yourself getting attention) -- it's gonna be all right.

Turner · Jan 18, 11:04 AM 2014

Ignatus...keep trying mate.
I just cant believe you would entertain a marty on the hope a large series wont happen. Its the first thing you syart to realise. You have had time to gain these basic understandings....and you havnt had to do it alone. Lots of advice frompeople has been shared with you.
Thats what I dont get

ignatus · Jan 18, 11:18 AM 2014

yes, thank you all for the advices and testings. ofcourse i make mistakes, like everyother human, but when it comes to roulette i can be very naive and stubborn sometimes,yes... now atleast i have rx,so, more testings can be done. but i haven't learned how to program it yet

iggiv · Jan 18, 11:22 AM 2014

you don't have to program it. Try to beat roulette on short runs, no thousands spins in a row. And sometimes you did get some smart ideas but you abandon them right away and start with new ones.

Roulette is unbeatable on a long run, remember this. Good luck.

ddarko · Jan 18, 11:24 AM 2014

Quote from: ignatus on Jan 18, 11:18 AM 2014
yes, thank you all for the advices and testings. ofcourse i make mistakes, like everyother human, but when it comes to roulette i can be very naive and stubborn sometimes,yes... now atleast i have rx,so, more testings can be done. but i haven't learned how to program it yet

Spike/Cheese on more than one occasion stated "keep it simple silly"

I like this statement

you cannot program in RX fair enough I doubt many of us can, but you can still test. Although it maybe slower testing "by hand" on RX it would prepare you better for playing your method at a B&M casino would it not ?

Every cloud has a silver lining.......

Also I only ever test per 100 spin sessions, why test 1000 spins sessions when you wouldn't be able to sit at a table that long anyway ?

But my bot can run for 1000's of spins ?

Well that's great

keep on taking small amounts from on-line casino's OR get off your arse n play for way way bigger amounts at a B&M casino

News:

Count 5