Looking At Something

[buffalowizard]

Hi,

I've been looking at double streets in columns and how each side
tends to distribute very evenly.

I'll explain.

List the DS's in 2 columns like this:

A B
2 4
3 1
5 2
5 1   etc

So all I was looking for were the repeat one each side,
doesn't matter if they repeat once, twice whatever.

In each 100 spins, I noted how many repeats were on each
column, A and B.

Here are the results:

8/8
7/5
9/10
5/6
6/5
7/6
6/4
5/7

There were maybe another 500 spins where
there were no column had more than 3 more
repeats within 100 spins.

So how can we take advantage of this, that's the
question!

One way is to wait for one column to get a repeat, and then
bet the other column. The longest gap was 19 doing
this.

Any suggestions if there's any other way to exploit this
apparently nice distribution here?

Cheers

[buffalowizard]

A      B

4   5
5   4
6   1
2   6
3   2
6   2  Column B is 1-0 up here
6   4  Column A has equalised! 1-1
5   1
4   4
5   6
2   4
6   2
2   3
6   5
5   2
5   3  2-1 to A
4   5
3   6
3   4  3-1
3   2
5   3
2   4
5   5
1   4
3   1
1   2
5   3
1   6
2   6 3-2
5   2
6   2 3-3
6   1 4-3
4   3
3   5
1   1
1   5 5-3
1   5 5-4
6   6
6   4 6-4
1   3
3   5
1   6
1   5 7-4
6   1
5   4
2   3 7-5
5   3
2   3
6   5
1   6

7-5, a difference of 2.

Never seen more than a difference of 3 in a 100 spin session.
Just wish there was a secure bet selection for this

[buffalowizard]

Another session

A      B

5   4
2   4  0-1
1   3
4   6
1   4
5   4  0-2
6   3
5   4
6   1
1   4
2   6
2   5  1-2
4   1
1   3
4   1
6   4
3   2
6   6
2   6  1-3
2   6  2-3
4   2
4   5  3-3
4   3
6   4
6   6  4-3
1   6  4-4
3   6
5   4
3   3
3   6  5-4
1   1
2   6
5   5
6   1
2   2
5   5
2   1
4   5
2   2
1   2  5-5
5   1
1   5
4   2
1   5
4   2
2   5
1   1
3   2
1   1
1   6  6-5

[buffalowizard]

I'm thinking maybe wait till one column is in the lead by 2 and then backing the other column to hit - long periods of waiting so may require a bot but seems like a very strong selection

[TwoCatSam]

Wiz

When you write

4 5

Is 4 the first DS and 5 the next to come?

Sam

[Azim]

I'm thinking maybe wait till one column is in the lead by 2 and then backing the other column to hit - long periods of waiting so may require a bot but seems like a very strong selection

From the sample provided. I was going to say the same wait for a difference of 2 and bet the trailing DS.

Question is would you use progression or wait for 3-4 spins and follow it with flat betting?

[buffalowizard]

Wiz

When you write

4 5

Is 4 the first DS and 5 the next to come?

Sam

Yea that's right Sam

[buffalowizard]

From the sample provided. I was going to say the same wait for a difference of 2 and bet the trailing DS.

Question is would you use progression or wait for 3-4 spins and follow it with flat betting?

Good point Azim,
I'll do some more tests and see which one works best

[buffalowizard]

I have decided that the best way to play this method is to wait for one column to be 2 ahead of the other and then to bet for a repeat hit in the column that is behind. As in the sample below, this means sometimes only one bet per 100 spins, but it usually is VERY strong. More testing to come.


A      B
1   5
1   2   1-0
4   6
5   4
4   2
5   6
6   1
4   5
6   3
3   3   1-1
2   5
5   1
4   4
2   6
3   3
6   5
3   4
3   2   2-1
5   4
3   5
2   1
3   5
6   6
2   1
1   2
3   5   
3   5   3-1 Column A hits first to give us the trigger, and we get a hit immediately in column B! 3-2
6   2
5   2   3-3
4   6
3   3
6   2
4   1
3   5
5   3
5   4   4-3
4   6
3   4
6   2
1   4
3   5
5   3
3   3   4-4
3   5   5-4
1   2
4   3
5   3   5-5
4   1
4   2   6-5
6   5

[buffalowizard]

A random.org sample that is quite remarkable and shows that 100 spins can indeed have quite a few triggers too.
Here, you see the power of this trigger. Remember, we're only betting 1 double street, and each time it wins within 6 spins - that isn't to say this is a flat betting method, but it isn't far off!

Never seen quite so many completed outcomes than this.


5   6
5   6  1-0 / 1-1
6   4
1   2
1   3  2-1
3   4
3   3  3-1 TRIGGER
4   3  3-2 WIN
1   3
5   2
5   4  4-2 TRIGGER
3   4  4-3 WIN
5   2
4   6
2   5
2   5  5-3 TRIGGER/ 5-4 WIN wow!
5   4
4   5
6   1
4   3
3   6
4   1
5   2
5   4  6-4 TRIGGER
4   1
5   2
1   6
3   6  6-5 WIN  (see how every time, the other column just HAS to try and claw its way back)
3   2  7-5 TRIGGER
4   2  7-6 WIN
6   6
1   3
2   4
4   2
3   2  7-7 (and now it has reached parity)
4   4
2   2
6   2  7-8
6   5  8-8
4   3
4   1  9-8
6   4
1   4  9-9
6   2
1   4
3   2
5   3
2   1
2   5  10-9
3   4

[buffalowizard]

Another session, one win after 8 spins.

Thinking maybe stopping if the other column goes 3 ahead (which it did in this case)
or perhaps stopping after 6 spins and no win.

Then when you get another trigger, you can bet with 2 units, instead of 1.


2   2
1   1
6   6
6   2  1-0
3   6
4   1
2   4
5   1
4   1  1-1
1   4
5   5
1   4
5   4  1-2
3   2
4   3
2   4
5   6
5   4  2-2
5   4  2-3
1   5
3   6
1   4
4   6
6   6  2-4 TRIGGER
2   1
4   3
1   3  2-5
5   1
3   5
2   6
1   3
1   1  3-5 WIN
3   3
2   4
3   3
2   2 
2   2   4-5 / 5-5
1   1
3   5
6   5   5-6
4   6
1   2
4   1
5   4
2   6
2   3   6-6
5   4
4   4   6-7
2   3
6   1

[buffalowizard]

One more session:

6   1
3   2
6   3
6   6  1-0
1   6  1-1
6   6
5   5
1   4
3   3
3   1  2-1
5   4
1   4  2-2
1   2  3-2
2   5
2   2  4-2  TRIGGER
1   5
5   3
1   3  4-3 WIN
2   3
4   1
4   6  5-3  TRIGGER
2   2
2   4  6-3 STOP HERE?
1   4  WIN 6-4
5   4
2   1
4   1  6-5
5   1
5   3  7-5 TRIGGER
4   2
5   5
3   1
5   1  7-6 WIN
1   1
2   5
6   1
5   4
6   4  7-7
2   4
5   3
3   5
1   2
1   4  8-7
5   6
6   5
3   2
5   6
1   4
2   5
5   3

[Azim]

From what you have on your spins.  If you re-track after a win. I have a feeling you will get more triggers.

This way the wait is not that long.  The re-track should only be after a win.

[buffalowizard]

So, Azim - if I understand correctly, after a win, you should start from scratch or 0-0 as it were?
Here's a session played as such.

6   1
4   6
2   2
1   6
6   3
3   6
4   1
1   3
4   6
4   4  1-0
5   5
5   5  2-0 / TRIGGER 2-1 WIN + RETRACK at 0-0
3   3
5   4
6   2
2   5
4   1
5   3
4   5
2   2
3   6
3   5  1-0
6   6
2   3
1   4
4   4  1-1
4   6  2-1
2   5
3   2
1   4
5   3
4   3  2-2
6   5
6   6  3-2
5   3
3   6
2   3
2   3  4-2 TRIGGER AND WIN 4-3 - RETRACK
4   1
6   2
3   2  0-1
2   6
5   3
5   6  1-1
2   1
4   5
5   5  1-2
6   4
6   1  2-2
2   2

etc. 

I still am amazed by the consistency of the way the two columns
seem to 'even up'. Only one session in thousands of spins so far
has seen a great disparity, which was 9-3 to one side.

If we were to stop after one side got 3 ahead, then this streak would
have not been a problem. Rarely, as I've seen, do columns get 3 ahead
anyway.

Cheers

[buffalowizard]

An interesting session, where I implemented Azim's suggestion, plus a stop whereby a column goes 3 repeats ahead.

1   5
1   3  1-0
4   4
3   2
4   6
1   5
6   5  1-1
1   6
1   1  2-1
5   3
5   5  3-1 TRIGGER
1   3
4   1
3   2
2   2  3-2 WIN, RETRACK
6   3
1   1
6   1  0-1
2   6
3   6  0-2 TRIGGER
6   4
4   2
1   5
4   2
5   1
2   2
2   5  1-2 WIN, RETRACK
4   1
4   2  1-0
1   4
1   4  2-0 TRIGGER / WIN 2-1 + RETRACK
3   4
3   3  1-0
6   6
2   1
3   4
6   6
4   1
2   6
5   1
5   4  2-0 TRIGGER
3   3
3   3  3-0 STOP? Would have won the very next spin, but gotta stay strict! RETRACK
5   2
3   2  0-1
2   5
5   4
6   1
2   6
2   1  1-1