• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Which online casino is the best + Invincible system to reveal

Started by steven1212, Jan 31, 01:39 PM 2014

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

kingmaq

Quote from: steven1212 on Sep 27, 05:31 AM 2017
You are 100% WRONG. that’s the beauty of my system. You could have the first 12 days to be consecutive losses and only then start winning, and you would end up in big profit. With your example, the bankroll at the end of the 30 days would over 7500 if you had started at 1000 with the first 12 days all losses.

You are one more proof that people criticise and don’t even understand

Lol. Everybody understood that you recommend a starting bankroll of 1000 and you stake max 1/5=200 daily on double dozens, either you win +200 or lose -200 in both case you stop and come the next day.

Isn't this your system ?

steven1212

Quote from: kingmaq on Sep 27, 05:36 AM 2017
Lol. Everybody understood that you recommend a starting bankroll of 1000 and you stake max 1/5=200 daily on double dozens, either you win +200 or lose -200 in both case you stop and come the next day.

Isn't this your system ?

Not exactly no. First Madi has been using it wrong. Now You said in your previous message that if you lose 12 sessions in row you would not be profitable. This is wrong. Even if you lose 15 of them in a row you still have profit at the end of the month. Do you believe me or do you need me to prove it to you.

Madi

Hehe u also dont understand ? I thought that its only me

steven1212

Kingsmaq at this moment you have two options.

1. Post the following message “I was wrong Steven, and you are right that even if you lose 12 sessions in row you can still finish the month in HUGE profit”
2. Don’t post it, and I’m gonna prove to you that I’m right and to everyone else here that you criticise things without understanding them.

kingmaq

Quote from: steven1212 on Sep 27, 05:39 AM 2017
Not exactly no. First Madi has been using it wrong. Now You said in your previous message that if you lose 12 sessions in row you would not be profitable. This is wrong. Even if you lose 15 of them in a row you still have profit at the end of the month. Do you believe me or do you need me to prove it to you.

Go ahead mate, prove this to us .

Madi

"If u lose fist 15 in a row u will be in profit" show us steven.

Madi

Ye plz dont forget to complete ur 4 step marti progression.

kingmaq

Hold on man, Steven adjusts his stake after every cycle.

I didn't notice that. This is a nice trick I haven't tested yet such adaption

steven1212

Arghh I hate you for wasting my time. But ok let’s do it. You said that the system could win 18 sessions and lose 12 realistically speaking, but that the problem is that if the 12 losing sessions happen consecutively it will lose. So let’s prove you wrong. You want a starting balance of 1000, no problem.

Staritng balance £1000
Day 1: lost. £900
Day 2: lost. £810
Day 3: lost. £729
Day 4: lost. £656.10
Day 5: lost. £510.49
Day 6: lost. £531.441
Day 7: lost. £478.29
Day 8: lost. £430.46
Day 9: lost. £387.41
Day 10: lost. £348.67
Day 11: lost. £313.80
Day 12: lost. £282.42
Day 13: won. £338.90
Day 14: won. £406.69
Day 15: won. £488.03
Day 16: won. £585.63
Day 18: won. £702.76
Day 19: won. £843.31
Day 20: won. £1,011.97
Day 21: won. £1,214.37
Day 22: won. £1,457.24
Day 23: won. £1,748.69
Day 24: won. £2,098.43
Day 25: won. £2,518.12
Day 26: won. £3,021.75
Day 27: won. £3,626.10
Day 28: won. £4,351.32
Day 29: won. £5,221.59
Day 30: won. £6,265.90

Boom. Total profit over 30 sessions starting with 12 consecutive losses: £5,265
The system protects you during the losing streaks and helps you recover when you win. The wins are exponential and the losses are the opposite. The facts that you win more than you win than you lose when you lose makes sure that even if you lose more sessions than you win you can still end up in profit. I gave you something magic, that I have been using for 5yeqrs and all you do is complain.
I just proved you wrong and I proved that Madi is using it wrong in his childish test as well.

I’ll accept a collective apology from the two of you.

steven1212

Quote from: kingmaq on Sep 27, 05:55 AM 2017
Hold on man, Steven adjusts his stake after every cycle.

I didn't notice that. This is a nice trick I haven't tested yet such adaption

Ah finally the beginning of an admission of guilt.
As you can see in my test, the more lose the more protected you are, to ensure you never bust. And it only takes 7 wins to recover your 12 consecutive losses.

RayManZ

But with a 1000 dollar bankroll divided by 5 is a 200 session bankroll?


Total bankroll: 1000
Session bankroll: 200
Win goal: Session bankroll
Stoploss: Session bankroll

Session bankroll is 20% of Total bankroll.
Always recalculate after a session.

I don't understand why people have a hard time understanding this...

ArmitageShanks

Hi Steven
When i was looking at this i split the 1000 into 5 so my loses were 200 then 160 the 128 etc etc and not the 100 90 81 that you show. Im i doing something wrong?

kingmaq

Quote from: steven1212 on Sep 27, 06:03 AM 2017
Ah finally the beginning of an admission of guilt.
As you can see in my test, the more lose the more protected you are, to ensure you never bust. And it only takes 7 wins to recover your 12 consecutive losses.

My dear friend Steven, I am here to get new ideas and help others with mine.

When i checked your system again i found that you adjust your stakes... that's cool man.

But I don't understand how you calculated your loses above.

If I start with 1000 bankroll and I am supposed to stake 80 which represents 200 chips that I must recycle on the roulette table and I am supposed either to be +200 or -200.

According to your calculus the first day I lose my bankroll drops to 900 !! That's wrong because it should drop to 800 !!!!

steven1212

Quote from: kingmaq on Sep 27, 06:08 AM 2017
My dear friend Steven, I am here to get new ideas and help others with mine.

When i checked your system again i found that you adjust your stakes... that's cool man.

But I don't understand how you calculated your loses above.

If I start with 1000 bankroll and I am supposed to stake 80 which represents 200 chips that I must recycle on the roulette table and I am supposed either to be +200 or -200.

According to your calculus the first day I lose my bankroll drops to 900 !! That's wrong because it should drop to 800 !!!!

No it doesn’t this is written in my original post as well I don’t understand why I have to explain everything a hundred times. But I’ll explain again.

In the example of code4, the session is 80 units. If you bust on your first bet, you will be at -80 units. But if you bust on your 10th bet, you will be at -70 only because you have won 10 units before busting.
Sometimes you will bust on the first bet and lose the full 80 units. But sometimes you will lose on the last best and lose only 1 unit because you’ve won 79 before losing. So you don’t lose your full stake ! This is th beauty of it.
For the purpose of calculation, we assume that in every lost session you bust right in the middle, which is the average of losing in the first bet vs the last bet. And it’s a realistic average because I’ve been playing this for 5 years.
So we assume that you lose your session on the 40th bet. Right in the middle.
In our example, the first session has 200 bet size. You progression buts in the middle of your session. You lose 200, but you have also won 100. Therefore you only lose 100 in this session. Your new bankroll is 900.

steven1212

Quote from: ArmitageShanks on Sep 27, 06:08 AM 2017
Hi Steven
When i was looking at this i split the 1000 into 5 so my loses were 200 then 160 the 128 etc etc and not the 100 90 81 that you show. Im i doing something wrong?

Read my last post I just answered that same question.

-