• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Fibonacci idea....

Started by RouletteGhost, Sep 03, 07:48 PM 2014

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

RouletteGhost

How about a fibonacci where you reset on ANY win

lets say you choose low 1-18

Lose -10
Lose  -20
Lose  -30
Lose  -50
Lose  -80
Win    +130
win    +10
lose  -10
lose  -20
lose  -30
win   +50

on this example we are only down $60

only down 60 when we only WON 3 out of 11 bets

so winning 3 out of a 11 is not a huge loss and believe me the wins will come back

a way to really minimize losses?

test it!
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Lee

It's a very risky progression and you may hit the table limits.

Google the Guetting Progression and the Wrangler March bet selection on EC.

A solid bet selection along with a positive progression is a lot safer.

Regards,
If you think you can, or you think you can't, you right. - Henry Ford

A blind man knows he cannot see, and is glad to be led, though it be by a dog; but he that is blind in his understanding, which is the worst blindness of all, believes he sees as the best, and scorns a guide. - Samuel Butler

RouletteGhost

you would never hit the table limit on a Fibonacci. i mean its possible but HIGHLY unlikely

and it was you that said this "Consider betting H or L, they repeat within 9 spins with a high percentage"

trust me betting on high or low u would never hit the table limit on a Fibonacci, especially my version where you reset on a win.........
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

FYI, to hit the table limit betting on LOW 1-18 with a Fibonacci using my system you'd have to lose like 15 times in a row. never happen
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

simple idea. use a Fibonacci progression then when you win, instead of continuing, reset
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Lee

They do repeat within 9 spins, but not always. Play long enough, say 4 times a week, for several years, and you will see the high dozen repeat 15 spins, or black repeat 17 spins, or even zero repeat 4 times in a row. Heck, once I saw #27 hit 4 times in a row.

If you like an EC bet on H/L with a Fibonacci I would suggest you wait til one sleeps 7 spins then start betting on it. The table max at Dublin is $500 on EC, so you would have 9 chances to hit it at your $10 example bet. 

All I was saying is bet selection is the first key. It is what will make or break you. SECOND is the progression. Without a good bet selection no negative progression is safe, and really, any negative progression on EC is risky.
If you think you can, or you think you can't, you right. - Henry Ford

A blind man knows he cannot see, and is glad to be led, though it be by a dog; but he that is blind in his understanding, which is the worst blindness of all, believes he sees as the best, and scorns a guide. - Samuel Butler

GLC

Rich,  here's a similar idea using D'Alembert and a trigger.  There was a lot of interest in it for a while, so you might find something that you can use to make your idea more appealing.

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

Chris555p

@richbailey86

Thanks for the post. In the above example, assuming u did not win on the 6th bet, would u please let us know what would be
the progression for the next 4 bets thanks.

RouletteGhost

Thanks GLC ill look into it.

And chris if I lost the 6th bet my next bet would be the next step in a fibonacci progression, then on a win id reset to the beginning. The difference between my modified fibonnaci and the original is instead of going down 1 or 2 steps after a win trying to secure 2 wins in a row, I go back to the beginning after a single win

See example again

Minimizes losses
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

atlantis

Hi Rich,

My result just now was +24 in 100 spins betting LOW each spin...

Playing your way and resetting after each win to the first step EXCEPT - I am using 2 stages to each bet element/step of the Fibo...

:)

1-1-2-2-3-3-5-5-8-8-13-13-21-21-34-34....

A.

PS. oh - BTW the highest bets was 3u (probably a bit lucky)
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

RouletteGhost

Thanks for that modification atlantis. Ill try
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Chris555p

@ Rich thanks for ur reply.

@ Atlantis, Thanks also.  One question do u move one step on the right after
each loss; and one step to the left after each win.....?


RouletteGhost

Chris what he does is reset at the first win

Move to the right on a loss and when you get a win, reset to beginning

His progression is same as mine but he extends it instead of 1 2 3 5 8 he does 1 1 2 2 3 3 5 5 8 8. An extended fibonacci
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

the Fibonacci did good for me on baccarat, id go back 2 steps on a win, but i found that 2 wins in a row wasnt happening all the time, so before i knew it my bets were huge

then it dawned on me, perhaps a fibonacci where you rest on any win would do well

as my example showed, on a $10 minimum bet, if you lose 8 out of 11 bets you are down 60, not too bad and easy to recover from, just keep resetting after a win

on roulette u can have a trigger, bet against a streak, if HIGH hits 4 times in a row start on LOW

same with baccarat, bet against a streak using the fibonacci reset
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Chris555p

@ Rich

Thanks for the reply; To arrive at the 34 units bet we need to loose
14 times in a row.....which is great for ec bets.

With a good bet selection where the hit rate is around 50%, this
progression would be a real winner. What do u think....?

Cheers


Chris

-