• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Idea for new system based on dozens and columns

Started by falkor, Dec 20, 09:57 AM 2014

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

falkor

Divide the board up into 9 sections based on the dozens and columns:
1,4,7,10
2,5,8,11
3,6,9,12
13,16,19,22
...
etc.

When one of those areas hits bet 1 chip on the matching dozen and 1 chip on the matching column (2 chips in total) hoping for a repeat of that area (one of the 4 numbers).

If you lose then repeat the same bet, but add another 2 chips to the board based on the new area that hit instead (note: one dozen or column may now have 2 chips on it if there has been some overlap). If you then lose again but win on the 4th spin, i.e. a win for this system means that the same area/4 numbers has repeated since the beginning of the set, the profit will be 3 units.

Losing beyond the 4th spin, at some point, I think there will need to be some kind of progression - any volunteers to figure this out? If 0 hits then perhaps an extra chip will need to be added to all dozens and all columns. Most losses will have their blows softened due to the combination of dozen and column bets happening simultaneously across the board - in fact, most sets would probably need chips on all 6 sections, albeit in differing amounts - resulting in long-lasting progressions.

Has this system been thought of before?

winkel

Yes its one of the most losing systems. Every col/doz kombination has the highest loss-risc of all games.

better and more efficent is to bet only the four numbers!
There is always a game

Turner

Ditto winkel
I think flatino played the 9.
L v F?  or somthing
He pitted last against farthest in some way

Crapshooter

So, from the comments, you are saying this strategy is a no-go? I'm trying to find some good ones to try here. I'm open for suggestions on any newer ideas anyone has.

Turner

Quote from: Crapshooter on Dec 25, 01:44 AM 2015
So, from the comments, you are saying this strategy is a no-go? I'm trying to find some good ones to try here. I'm open for suggestions on any newer ideas anyone has.

I think Falkor summed it up nicely when he said

"hoping for a repeat"

-