Two dozen method by TurboGenius

[nottophammer]

after a win wait next 4 spins then bet, if win wait for four more spins,then bet

[ego]

psimoes is correct - i write on a rolling basis - that is the original ...

cheers

[nottophammer]

2               
3               
3               
3               
2 L.            1/3L   
2 W.            1/2W      
2 W.            NB      
1 W.            NB      
1 W.            NB      
2 L.                 NB       
1 W.            1/3   W   
2 W.            NB      
1 L.            NB      
1 W.            NB      
3 W.            NB      
1 W.            1/3   W   
1 L.            NB      
2 W.            NB      
1 W.            NB      
3 W.            NB      
2 W.            2/3   W   
2 L.                 NB      
1 L.            NB      
1 W.            NB      
2 L.            NB      
1 W.            1/3   W   
1 L.            NB      
2 W.            NB      
3 W.            NB      
3 W.            NB      
1 L.            2/3   L   
3 W.            1/3   W   
3 L.            NB      
1 W.            NB      
2 W.         NB      
2 W.         NB      
1 W.         1/2   W   
2 W.         NB      
1 W.         NB      
1 W.         NB      
2 W.         NB      
2 L.         1/3   L   
3 W.         2/3   W   
2 W.         NB      
3 W.         NB      
2 L.         NB      
3 L.         NB      
1 W         1/3   W   
3 L         NB      
1 W         NB      
1 W         NB      
1         NB      
1         1/2   W   
2               +10
2               
1               
2

WHEN WIN WAIT FOUR THEN BET, DID OK. If lose 1st bet wait for next trigger bet next part of progression.               
               

[nottophammer]

WH,ENF   6.1.15      
5   1      
7   1      
20   2      
30   3      
20   b   2/3   w
7   1      
14   2      
8   1      
15   2      
16   b   2/3   w
11   1      
27   3      
16   2      
11   1      
30   b   2/3   w
6   1      
26   3      
15   2      
5   1      
6   b   2/3   l
25      1/2   l
28      1/3   w
0   0      
26   3      
16   2      
24   2      
27   3      
24   b   1/2   w
2   1      
8   1      
15   2      
17   2      
14   b   2/3   w
29   3      
31   3      
6   1      
6   1      
29   b   1/2   l
4      1/2   w
12   1      
18   2      
6   1      
19   2      
18   b   2/3   w
19   2      
34   3      
25   3      
35   3      
4   b   1/3   w
16   2      
29   3      
22   2      
26   3      
17   b   1/3   l
18      1/2   w
23   2      
9   1      
24   2      
8   1      
1   b   1/3   w
         
         

[nottophammer]

lad,enf   6.1.15      
29   3      
27   3      
28   3      
30   3      
10   b   1/2   w
25   3      
22   2      
1   1      
36   3      
5   b   1/2   w
4   1      
6   1      
1   1      
14   2      
33   b   2/3   w
17   2      
32   3      
27   3      
35   3      
31   b   1/3   w
30   3      
25   3      
9   1      
3   1      
19   b   1/2   w
19   2      
18   2      
20   2      
20   2      
34   b   1/3   w
33   3      
22   2      
7   1      
15   2      
13   b   1/2   w
33   3      
4   1      
18   2      
6   1      
15   b   1/2   w
19   2      
36   3      
30   3      
6   1      
12   b   1/3   w
5   1      
35   3      
17   2      
5   1      
24   b   2/3   w
29   3      
20   2      
28   3      
23   2      
1   b   1/2   w
24   2      
10   1      
19   2      
14   2      
32   b   1/3   w

[psimoes]

Looks good for 1 unit a day. Bring 5000, bet 100+100 until in plus, stop?

Still with the tweak there are bad runs out there. And it'd take a while to recover, just like another day at the office.

I thought about why this method works well. It's not the same as betting different than the previous outcome, seeing that a dozen repeating for five times isn't that unusual. Add a zero or two and it tanks the progression.

Betting different than the fourth last outcome makes more sense.  The problem is when a pattern like 1xxx1xxx1xxx1xxx develops, or when a dozen repeats for eight(!) times.

I tried betting different than the eighth outcome and it worked, with lots of wins in a row. But when it went bad, it went really bad. It took one single bad run in 300 spins to tank. Variance is always there.

Then one thing happens: there is at least one Loss every 10 spins. That's almost guaranteed. Which means there's "always" a single dozen that cycles at least once.

Betting instead for that dozen to hit makes sense. We can use a fibo for that. And then wait for the cycle to end and repeat procedure.

I will start a thread about it.

[Chris555p]

@Ego - Concerning the progression, I have very good results playing in group of 7 bets i.e
no need to skip the 1st bet. Bet the relevant 2 dozens for 7 betting opportunities.

As long as we are winning we stay at 1 unit. After  making the  7 bets, we evaluate.  If we are
in minus we bet 2 units for 7 times. As soon as we have recovered we go back to 1 unit. Rinse, wash, and repeat.

Give it a try, u will be nicely surprised with the results.

[sturrock]

Hi Chris.  Are you playing every bet or waiting 4 after a win?

[Chris555p]

Hi Sturrock

I wait 4 after a win.

[atlantis]

Nice idea Chris555p 

A.

[ego]

@Ego - Concerning the progression, I have very good results playing in group of 7 bets i.e
no need to skip the 1st bet. Bet the relevant 2 dozens for 7 betting opportunities.

As long as we are winning we stay at 1 unit. After  making the  7 bets, we evaluate.  If we are
in minus we bet 2 units for 7 times. As soon as we have recovered we go back to 1 unit. Rinse, wash, and repeat.

Give it a try, u will be nicely surprised with the results.

I will test that.

Cheers

[Chris555p]

@Atlantis

I'm glad u like the idea.

Cheers

Chris

[GLC]

Its Realy One Professional Roulette Gambler - REGELE RULETEI BUZAN ADRIAN?can somebody tell something about him?

Max,  If it's good enough to sell for a small fortune, it should be good enough to earn a big fortune.

We all know that the margin between a winning system and a losing system is usually bankroll and table limits.  The house has such a small advantage, and none at all against no zero roulette other than their fee if you win, that no system like the one above can guarantee being a long term winner.

Here's how to look at every system to see if it's a long term winner or not.  Determine the results if each number from 0 - 36 were to hit one time.  Add up your wins and subtract your losses.  This will tell you if the house has an advantage or if you have an advantage.  If the house has an advantage, only luck will keep enough of those losing numbers from hitting so close together that it drives you too deep in the hole to recover.  Or if you're using a progression it will get so steep that you either run out of money or you hit the table limit. 

End of story.  Steve's right.  If you can't predict where the ball will land with an accuracy than overcomes the unfair pay-off, you can't win long term unless you're lucky.

With good discipline, money control etc... you can minimize your chances of losing, but you can never guarantee that someone will be a winner!

GLC

[mogul397]

SO I have a couple thoughts in this direction. If I understand the method correctly you just play
the other two doz from the 4th result back, betting flat.

Two ideas/thoughts.

1) In the interest of finding a starting point I have played with even props playing the next to last result. Hoping that basically I would stay even. It sort of works, while at times slowly
crawling in one direction or another (it usually is in the direction of negative). My hope then,
is to play a mild progression to offset this as well as generating a profit. Maybe increasing my
bet to 2 units if I an negative 2 or 3, and then coming back somehow. An extended D'alenbert of some type.  But I don't have anything solid yet. Just like in a similar vein to this dozens idea,  that it is well under control. Which is the point I am seeing.

2) There is another approach where you can play a labby cancellation with a simple 1 unit bet increase on both dozens bet.
What this accomplishes is that a labby only needs> 50% wins to conclude a cancellation, up against a selection method
that has a 66% probability of hitting. Definitely turning the odds of cancelling a run in your favor.

Two slightly different notions. But I wonder what thought or feedback anyone has to agree with or expand on these.

ALan

[RouletteGhost]

this looks good

chris is right, gr8 progression on double dozens is a good idea