• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

@ turbo

Started by Steve, Dec 29, 07:00 AM 2016

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

Steve

Progression almost always wins in the short term.

And betting on rare events can appear to work in the short term too.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Priyanka

Here is the link to excel. I have tested 10 million spins and it seems to hold good. Hmm!! Warned about the excel formula though, it might have been tampered :o 8) ??? ::)

link:s://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8V2R2PUfxa7U1NNV05mMldKNGc/view?usp=sharing
Disclaimer : Roulette systems are subject to laws of probability. If you are not sure about the effects of it, please refer to link:://:.genuinewinner.com/truth. Don't get robbed by scammers.

RouletteGhost

Betting twos to become threes?
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Priyanka

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Jan 29, 05:41 PM 2017
Betting twos to become threes?
Kind of that with a difference. As this is a test, this test always plays one number.

Twos to become threes and 3s to become 4s so on until it becomes 10s. However this is played only if there is only one number dominating. If there are two numbers that are in 2s no bet is made until one of it becomes 3.  Rest when any number reaches 10s or a new high in bank roll.

There is also a progression. Progressions is 2 units if you are playing for 2s to becomes 3s, 3 units if you are  playing 3s to become 4s and so on.
Disclaimer : Roulette systems are subject to laws of probability. If you are not sure about the effects of it, please refer to link:://:.genuinewinner.com/truth. Don't get robbed by scammers.

falkor2k15

Quote from: Priyanka on Jan 29, 05:47 PM 2017
Kind of that with a difference. As this is a test, this test always plays one number.

Twos to become threes and 3s to become 4s so on until it becomes 10s. However this is played only if there is only one number dominating. If there are two numbers that are in 2s no bet is made until one of it becomes 3.  Rest when any number reaches 10s or a new high in bank roll.

There is also a progression. Progressions is 2 units if you are playing for 2s to becomes 3s, 3 units if you are  playing 3s to become 4s and so on.
8)  O0  :thumbsup: Who is your teacher's teacher @ Excel and Roulette?
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

RouletteGhost

I know it works because its logic

Pull any 37

There's always 3s and 4s
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Steve

The randbetween function is notoriously inaccurate with excessive repeats, so shouldnt be used in tests. Many RNG have the same problem. Nevertheless I dont understand what the excel is doing. Please explain the exact logic?

"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

denzie

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Jan 29, 06:05 PM 2017
I know it works because its logic

Pull any 37

There's always 3s and 4s

RG....really?  How many cycles you've tested? A 3s always?  No. A 4s always?  Hell no......
As spins roll off our predictions get better

Priyanka

Quote from: Steve on Jan 29, 06:13 PM 2017
The randbetween function is notoriously inaccurate with excessive repeats, so shouldnt be used in tests. Many RNG have the same problem. Nevertheless I dont understand what the excel is doing. Please explain the exact logic?
Understand the limitations and you could use your own numbers.

The logic is explained fully in reply 124
Disclaimer : Roulette systems are subject to laws of probability. If you are not sure about the effects of it, please refer to link:://:.genuinewinner.com/truth. Don't get robbed by scammers.

denzie

Quote from: Priyanka on Jan 29, 05:33 PM 2017
Here is the link to excel. I have tested 10 million spins and it seems to hold good.

Only 10 million?  Thats nothing. So doesn't count. We need a kazilliontrillionbillionsuper mega. .....illons ....

Joking . Good job  :)
As spins roll off our predictions get better

denzie

Question for TG.....

What are you trying to accomplish?
What if I or someone post how it should be done ? What if someone code it and prove this really works? What if people see and read it and use it ?

Now what if casino's adjust there wheel or rules based on this method? 

You gave enough info imo. More than enough. To much actually.
As spins roll off our predictions get better

Steve

The logic is wrong. Just because a number has repeated 1, 2, 3 or however many times, it is no more likely to repeat on the next spin, or the next 10 spins, 37 spins or whatever. This is an approach that has been tested extensively. To reveal it as fallacy I released free testing software to help people. Its at link:://:.roulettephysics.com/roulette-pattern-detector/

Priyanka, if you are simulating this approach with excel and it is showing a profit over millions of spins, you would have an error in the calculations somewhere. Unfortunately Im not an expert at excel so I cant follow the coding.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

RouletteGhost

so let me get this straight

if a profit shows then it "must be wrong"

that is steves stance

so that proves a winning method could never be proven to steve because he would not accept it

he wants it proven to him, and if so, it must be wrong

broken down: steve says if there is profits over millions of spins it is coded wrong: laymens terms: steve believes no such thing exists, so debating him on it is pointless at best
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

now everyone knows here each spin is independent and a repeater doesnt define the next spin and anything can happen

but the fact is 38 in 38 will never happen before our eyes
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

falkor2k15

Quote from: Steve on Jan 29, 06:59 PM 2017
The logic is wrong. Just because a number has repeated 1, 2, 3 or however many times, it is no more likely to repeat on the next spin, or the next 10 spins, 37 spins or whatever. This is an approach that has been tested extensively. To reveal it as fallacy I released free testing software to help people. Its at link:://:.roulettephysics.com/roulette-pattern-detector/

Priyanka, if you are simulating this approach with excel and it is showing a profit over millions of spins, you would have an error in the calculations somewhere. Unfortunately Im not an expert at excel so I cant follow the coding.
She described a few more additional rules. I'll test it out next week to see... It might be possible to reverse engineer the spread sheet too to confirm the rules are as described - certainly easier than the videos. We have to give her the benefit of the doubt now - until proven right, wrong or phony.
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

-