• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Random Cracker

Started by ignatus, Jan 06, 01:22 PM 2017

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ignatus

This is not my invention, i remember this system, (but i don't remember who invented it!) all credits to the inventor. not me. This is an EC-system. This is the way i play it;

Procedure: Bet against the last 4 outcomes in any EC. (i chose to play with R/B)

For an example the four last outcomes was RBRR---> now you bet BRBB

When hit, (or lost the 4 steps) repeat procedure,(reset to 1u) and bet against the new 4 last outcomes

Total risk is a 4 step marty 1-2-4-16 STOP.

Losses do happen, and they have to be accepted. but that should not be the end of the world, since hitrate and recovery seems to be good.

If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

ignatus

Quote from: ignatus on Jan 06, 01:22 PM 2017
Total risk is a 4 step marty 1-2-4-8 STOP.

Correction
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

ignatus

Test 2.
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

ignatus

Test 3.
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

thelaw

Just to clarity, +/-200 win or stop loss.......correct? :question:
You sir.......are a monster!!!

ignatus

Quote from: thelaw on Jan 06, 03:42 PM 2017
Just to clarity, +/-200 win or stop loss.......correct? :question:

Moneymanagement is not my strong side, but from my testings of earlier systems i now use to say:

Bankroll needed: 2*wingoal, or 3*wingoal, that should work in most cases

If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

thelaw

I was referring to your specific tests above.

Stop at +200 or -200 .........correct? :question:

Cheers! :thumbsup:
You sir.......are a monster!!!

ignatus

Quote from: thelaw on Jan 06, 04:00 PM 2017
I was referring to your specific tests above.

Stop at +200 or -200 .........correct? :question:

Cheers! :thumbsup:

No? This was played with 5u bets, now playing with 5u bets, minimum bankroll *should be* 500u, but since hitrate seems to be good(?), a lower stoploss can be used, with a wingoal of 100u, a stoploss (wingoal*2 or wingoal*3) of -200u, or -300u 

So, having a wingoal of 200u, then a stoploss would be -400u or -600u

Playing with 1u bets, minimum bankroll *should be* 100u, really. Then a reasonable wingoal would be ~50u.

I played with 5u bets for demonstration, haven't encounterd a losing sequence yet, but we all know, that is bound to happen sooner or later.
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

-