So whats left?

[bobby]

I just got my proposal back and I'm looking to open an online casino... can't beat'm, join'm 

[Steve]

There are countless ideas left. But to start, understand what has already failed and why. Focus on prediction accuracy. I keep saying it.

[nowun]

Focus on prediction accuracy.

Absolutely agree.

[DoctorSudoku]

Recently I read Turbogenius concepts where he writes to wait 7 cycles of 37 spins, and start playing 7 cold numbers with positive progression.
In the second session betvoyager ended the session for -4000 units. I do not know how many positive sessions would be needed to make a profit.

Don't be too surprised.

That is the typical outcome of nearly all of turbogenius's methods.

[denzie]

Don't be too surprised.

That is the typical outcome of nearly all of turbogenius's methods.

I'm sorry to say but that's not true. You can't say it doesn't work if you don't know how he plays. Here and the other forum he gets a lot of heat. But not one single post said correctly how he plays. He ain't stupid guys. All info there but it's scrambled. Now up to you to fix the puzzle.

And tell me ozon....How did you played that 7 cold method?  (Which isn't a method but a point he tried to make ). But seriously how did you play it ?

[MumboJumbo]

Ask WallyGator what is left you will get the best answer 

[Steve]

You can't say it doesn't work if you don't know how he plays. Here and the other forum he gets a lot of heat

He gave enough information for anyone to understand his statements are contradictory, and his theories are invalid. Its nothing personal against turbo, Ive usually gotten along with him fine. He at least isnt a fruitcake like some. But unfortunately he's wrong but I sincerely would like for him to be right.

The whole parx thing is a waste of time for reasons I explained. Much better validation wpuld be rouletteplayers.org but he may argue Id try to steal his system. So noe he's looking at live spins, but any reasonable proof would take a long time. So unless he plays with real money it would be a waste of his time.

Anyway the best way for him to test is code RX and run long term simulations.

As for new ideas, again there are so many. One of the likely more promising is fractals, but it takes a very thorough understanding. And probably by the time you figure it out, you will have deeper knowledge if other things then will have lost interest in roulette.

[ozon]

Hi Denzie
I  use tracker, I was waiting for 259 spins and I choose 7 coldest numbers, I started playing with 1 unit for every number after hitting each number I increased the stake to exactly that number. I played until I finished the progression, when the first number hit 16 units.
In fact, it may be that I was hit by a very bad variance of betvoyager.
In the past I have seen how good methods were destroyed at the beginning, and over time they came out plus.
But if in one session I lost 4 k units need at least 20 sessions to go out plus.

[ozon]

Another option that I did not play could be playing, progressing in that way, when hit one  of the coldest number, we raise stake for all numbers at the same time.
This option was not played, it may be more aggressive, but it may be more effective.

[3Nine]

When you have exhausted all possibilities, remember this - you haven't.
- Thomas Edison

[Taotie]

You will never exhaust all possibilities. You might as well make a wish as you try to blow out the sun.

BTW, all that people like Steve, and Herb/Farnsworth3/snowman/doctor sir anyone/etc/etc/ have told you are also possibilities.

[maestro]

run RX for say more than one cycle you will see how numbers go...will be a group of 12 to 15 numbers above or to std deviation of 0.5 say, so this is your group  of numbers to deal with...as number of that group hits put a chip on it and if another one hits back it too...how many number do you think roulette will pull before hits repeater from your group...i think you will be dealing with not that many numbers...just a thought

[nottophammer]

So whats left, Average, its all you have.
Ozzy remember i said they hit fast in last 20 spins where we expect to see 30.5 non-hit in 60 pins,


5 0x's came in last 10 spins, less 0x's to find, but nearly as many as spin 11-20


So avg attachment is there at reply 12, what you all waiting for, oh i know E/C, well good luck with that, also hot repeaters, would you make a profit as spin 49 is the R3, how much are the R2's costing

[nottophammer]

Even Morts #'s got 30 non-hit at spin 60, at spin 40 it had 26, 0x's , +2 on the expected 24



Oh look 9/10, what we see more often than 10/10, but thats a whole different ball game betting for 1 repeat in 10 spins, but doable

[nottophammer]

Mr Falkor, is it ok to be posting in here