Theories, Myths, Facts And Ideas

[Tinsoldiers]

the next outcome, but I don't find any application

That is exactly the problem always - APPLICATION.  Most of the things fail in roulette because we can’t get it to application stage because every time the ball is spinning every number in the wheel is equally likely.

[luckyfella]

I've read it and it's more confusing than the first thread he made.  His strategy seems to be based on averages playing out in the short term which is a classic error - basically gambler's fallacy.

His current model has statistical flaws.

However, such averages is worth exploring within the confines of math rules.

[falkor2k15]

That is exactly the problem always - APPLICATION.  Most of the things fail in roulette because we can’t get it to application stage because every time the ball is spinning every number in the wheel is equally likely.

Not everything is equally-likely though. Double dozens has more chance than single dozens, but because of risk/reward ratio there's no edge/application, so the problem with roulette might be more to do with variance and table limits.

[Steve]

Turbo quite clearly revealed his system, to anyone paying attention. I even laid it all, and the difference would only be trivial rules. The problem is it doesn't work. I explained why. Anyone wanting the truth need only read the whole @turbo thread carefully.

[Steve]

Double dozens has more chance than single dozens,

Define double dozens and single dozens. And please prove why one is more likely.

[falkor2k15]

Define double dozens and single dozens. And please prove why one is more likely.

It's nothing cryptic. Double dozens (1-2) is 66% vs. 33% for single dozens (3) so of course the former has more chance of appearing compared to the latter. Therefore, the problem isn't one of "not equally-likely", but that 2 dozens costs two units and 1 dozen only costs a single unit with a proportionate risk/reward.

[Steve]

2 is bigger than 1. How does that help?

If something doesnt increase accuracy of predictions to be better than random, its useless. Reality often sucks. But it's reality. We cant change it.

[Joe]

Like I said if you have 123 next spin has to be CL3 and cannot be CL1-2, so at that point you can be sure of the next outcome.

I haven't followed your posts so don't know what CL1 or CL1-2 means, but how can you be sure of the next outcome when all numbers are equally likely?

[Steve]

Falkor seems to have his own language. He can post pages of text, but nobody except him has any clue what he's talking about.

Not to offend you falkor, but you need to be clear for effective communication.

[Herby]

but nobody except him has any clue what he's talking about

The other way round, it's totally clear for readers.
Sideattackers will fail to understand.

[Herby]

every time the ball is spinning every number in the wheel is equally likely

This is fundamental true for a fair wheel.

[Steve]

Herby I dont doubt most people are unfamiliar with falkors terms exclusive to him. Only he uses particular terms.

[Herby]

Like I said if you have 123 next spin has to be CL3 and cannot be CL1-2, so at that point you can be sure of the next outcome.

For followers: this is trivial and worthless for predictions.

[MoneyT101]

Falkor seems to have his own language. He can post pages of text, but nobody except him has any clue what he's talking about.

Not to offend you falkor, but you need to be clear for effective communication.

No everyone that has been studying cycles pretty much understands him

[Blueprint]

No everyone that has been studying cycles pretty much understands him

Another contradiction.

Falkor isn’t the person for rhetorical questions.  He doesn’t understand....

Please don’t give him anymore direct ideas that were  already shared indirectly.

His mission is to find a winning bet an post it in the forum... keep this mind when giving falkor ideas