• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

System that passed 400 000 Random spins.

Started by ignatus, Apr 27, 05:23 AM 2020

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ignatus

i am willing to sell this now, it´s not a "Grail" but very close, so im thinking now perhaps a price between 200-300$ IF anyone interested.

you can also contact me by mail ignatus@hotmail.se

cheers
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

Roulettebeater

trade it for $100k.
steve's offer is still available.
A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

Steve

Ignatus, what are the minimum and maximum bets? With zero or no zero?
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

ignatus

Quote from: Steve on Apr 27, 06:03 AM 2020
Ignatus, what are the minimum and maximum bets? With zero or no zero?

it´s with zero. Also the progression i used (in this example, is 14 steps) I can´t tell much more about the prog?

What i can tell more. it´s a system based on "repeaters".

More than this i cannot tell?
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

Taotie

I'm loving the 37000 unit draw down right at the end of your graph.

Sure, I'll give you $200 for it. That way it will only cost me $37200 down the track....

charly

Quote from: ignatus on Apr 27, 06:22 AM 2020
it´s with zero. Also the progression i used (in this example, is 14 steps) I can´t tell much more about the prog?

What i can tell more. it´s a system based on "repeaters".

More than this i cannot tell?

What is your biggest bet size in this test??? If this bet is above table limits, your test is useless

Steve

Ignatus, the main thing i want to know is minimum and maximum bets. Can you reveal this?
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

ignatus

Quote from: charly on Apr 27, 06:32 AM 2020
What is your biggest bet size in this test??? If this bet is above table limits, your test is useless

Well? That can be modifed/fixed. What is the normal "tablelimit" for straightups....
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

ignatus

Quote from: Steve on Apr 27, 06:35 AM 2020
Ignatus, the main thing i want to know is minimum and maximum bets. Can you reveal this?

not yet. obviously i have to play within "tablelimits" and i need to modify the progression (as it looks like now?)
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

Steve

Ok im thinking you just have broad betting limits. If you correct this, you'll probably find results are the same as random bets with progression.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

ignatus

Quote from: Steve on Apr 27, 06:40 AM 2020
Ok im thinking you just have broad betting limits. If you correct this, you'll probably find results are the same as random bets with progression.

Well? i modifed the progression now (MAX 100u Tablelimit bet). The chart still looks good imo. perhaps there are more tweaks to be done with the progression, its not "finished yet" so? Still interested go ahead, if not, never mind then? I said "its not a grail"?
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

Steve

Try with typical table limits. For example:

Outside: 10-1000
Inside: 5-500

It varies between casinos. But this is about normal.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

ignatus

Quote from: Steve on Apr 27, 07:00 AM 2020
Try with typical table limits. For example:

Outside: 10-1000
Inside: 5-500

It varies between casinos. But this is about normal.

Alright thx
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

ignatus

Now, played with a POSITIVE PROGRESSION. (Bet 5-500u).

If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

cht

Quote from: ignatus on Apr 27, 06:22 AM 2020
it´s with zero. Also the progression i used (in this example, is 14 steps) I can´t tell much more about the prog?

What i can tell more. it´s a system based on "repeaters".

More than this i cannot tell?
Negative progression is a no no.
Flatbet, then some people might be interested.

-