Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

[Moxy]

Oh, are you really?

You, silly.

[gizmotron2]

You, silly.

I know you are but what am I?

[Moxy]

I know you are but what am I?

A silly goose.

[gizmotron2]

A silly goose.

I know you are but what am I?

[Herby]

Hi Mark,
I still follow your results on RS
still impressiv, so keep on going and forget the low IQ creatures

[gizmotron2]

Hi Mark,
I still follow your results on RS
still impressiv, so keep on going and forget the low IQ creatures

Thanks,

It's a fascinating test.  As you raise your base value bet you narrow the headroom to maneuver.  Headroom is a concept of not overloading the op-amps in a sound board chain of signals in a sound system or recording equipment. This mostly applied to analog equipment and the topic on clipping.  That phrase still exists today in digital equipment where you never over process the digital signal. There is a point where a computer processor can no longer support the full dynamic range. Well this headroom process applies to strategic MM.  Progression players run out of headroom when their bets max out the table limits  or their bankroll no longer supports the MM structure required to support it.

With RR you need room to maneuver.  You must be able to outlast the losing grinds.  Every once in a while you see me descend down to the 3000 limit down.  I play more cautiously when I get closer to the hard break. I actually dig in and play like I should always play.  But I do like to win sessions playing more loosely.

I wonder when how many sessions or spins are enough to even suggest a state of validation for RR?  I was proud of my first student that reached a 2 to 1 win rate betting on EC bets in only one month of instructions and a following month of establishing that win to loss ratio.

[gizmotron2]

Cool, I just broke thru to the top 100:

[gizmotron2]

Moving forward with this strategy online. I have decided to try out $15 win stop session points.  So that you can relate to what I do, if you are graphing my spins in my live play chart, I have a base volute bet now of 10 per chip. So it's a $1 bet or a $170 to $210 bet. I also move up to double or double double of that base value for attacking opportunities.

So to apply that to an online casino, in order to see if they are targeting (cheating ), I will use $5 as the base value bet on any outside EC bet. If I double that amount it will be $10, and $20 if I double double. My virtual bets will be $1 bets on any EC. So since I'm using a much smaller base bet value I guess I will test with a $150 to $300 bankroll. I don't lose when I stay at minimal values that fit inside the headroom of the bankroll. Funny, I'm learning what works and does not work because of Roulette Simulator. This headroom and the real way that I play, including all my bet selections. Why did it take me decades to discover what this sim does? The telemetry and tracking are superb.

[Moxy]

Hi Mark,
I still follow your results on RS
still impressiv, so keep on going and forget the low IQ creatures

Sure thing, Rider. 

[Moxy]

Thanks,

With RR you need room to maneuver.  You must be able to outlast the losing grinds.  Every once in a while you see me descend down to the 3000 limit down.  I play more cautiously when I get closer to the hard break. I actually dig in and play like I should always play.  But I do like to win sessions playing more loosely.

I wonder when how many sessions or spins are enough to even suggest a state of validation for RR?  I was proud of my first student that reached a 2 to 1 win rate betting on EC bets in only one month of instructions and a following month of establishing that win to loss ratio.

Operation Scorched Industry on schedule.  When does the calvary march?

[gizmotron2]

Operation Scorched Industry on schedule.  When does the calvary march?

What everyone wants to really know is if you are going to get in on it or not?

[Moxy]

What everyone wants to really know is if you are going to get in on it or not?

Let me gather the calvary on my end.  We shall all ride into battleground.  That'll learn 'em.

[gizmotron2]

Here, I just ran this off to show a person on the other forum how to visualise a win streak without the graph function. So I posted this example of only betting on the Reds. But look at the L / H section. There is a perfect sequence of singles on the weak side. That's a wonderful stretch of spins.

Code Select Expand




W | B  R | O  E | L  H | 0  6 | P | S |  --  SN  --  SP
   |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  96  --  37 ( $ -1260 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  97  --  14 ( $ -1170 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |  --  98  --  27 ( $ -1080 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |  --  99  --  27 ( $ -990 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  100  --  14 ( $ -900 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X |    X |   |   |  --  101  --  19 ( $ -810 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  102  --  25 ( $ -720 ) Red
X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  103  --  36 ( $ -630 ) Red
   | X    | X    |    X |    X | X | X |  --  104  --  31 ( $ -720 ) Red
X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   | X |  --  105  --  30 ( $ -630 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  106  --  24 ( $ -720 ) Red
   | X    | X    | X    | X    |   | X |  --  107  --  13 ( $ -810 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  108  --  21 ( $ -720 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  109  --  26 ( $ -810 ) Red
X |    X | X    | X    | X    |   |   |  --  110  --  09 ( $ -720 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X | X    | X | X |  --  111  --  23 ( $ -630 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  112  --  21 ( $ -540 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X | X    | X | X |  --  113  --  23 ( $ -450 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  114  --  25 ( $ -360 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  115  --  02 ( $ -450 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  116  --  24 ( $ -540 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  117  --  22 ( $ -630 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  118  --  24 ( $ -720 ) Red
X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  119  --  36 ( $ -630 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  120  --  24 ( $ -720 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  121  --  21 ( $ -630 ) Red
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  122  --  05 ( $ -540 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  123  --  21 ( $ -450 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X | X    | X | X |  --  124  --  23 ( $ -360 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  125  --  22 ( $ -450 ) Red


[gizmotron2]

Let me gather the calvary on my end.  We shall all ride into battleground.  That'll learn 'em.

Do you have a working method that is a well kept secret?

[Moxy]

Do you have a working method that is a well kept secret?

Nah.  I'm irrelevant here.  But in another realm, we could have tea and discourse.