• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

Started by gizmotron2, Jun 02, 09:50 AM 2020

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

gizmotron2

Quote from: Steve on Jun 19, 10:44 PM 2020
Exactly what's the point of the chart you attached? It just looks like some loses, then a recovery. It happens all the time even with random bets.

What's it supposed to prove exactly?

Thank God, (scripture excluded). Somebody noticed all this.  ( ubiquitous duh moment! ) I got bored to death from eking  out a simple wave structure of a continuous example of wins. I proved my point with the 50 wins in a row at 54 on average for win stops.  I was looking at other examples of getting to high marks so then decided to strike upward fast and went for super guru above 100,000. That was easy too. It's all boring to death. So I have gone into a phase of dogshit play. I'm doing the doggy doo method. It's less boring and all I do is chase BS to die. Death is just as rewarding as poop from #1. I like to experience both sides of kookville. Steve, it does not surprise me that it's you that asked the first and best question.

I can't plug away each day focused on these sims. I made my point. I'm very good if I want to win and I set the stop point very low.  I  like humor and camaraderie. Those of us that really gamble sort of enjoy each other.
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

Steve

"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

gizmotron2

Quote from: Steve on Jun 20, 12:35 AM 2020And I like boobs
That seems to be a chronic ailment of every rock star that I ever met. I told one guy that their band had the same problem as many very good bands. They have "hit-llitis." He said that all he had wss Tit-llitis."
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

Steve

"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

gizmotron2

Quote from: Steve on Jun 20, 02:10 AM 2020
It's a curse.

OK, all my work is properly camouflaged. Many people will now look at it as a fail.   (sinister)
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

Kairomancer

 :lol:

I think your method has great potential, if you can correctly identify the working conditions are in sync with your betting.

If you are out of sync nothing will help you to make it work, other than a sudden change.

gizmotron2

Quote from: Kairomancer on Jun 20, 12:20 PM 2020I think your method has great potential, if you can correctly identify the working conditions are in sync with your betting.

If you are out of sync nothing will help you to make it work, other than a sudden change.
All it takes for me is to decide to win. I then do all the work and patience required to get my three net wins. I can do it at will just about every time. I have never failed to gain the upper hand when I use 20 times my double down base level bet.  By example a $1 chip value goal would be $54 as a won session. At $2, the double down value, a single net win is $36. That means that a bankroll of $720 is needed to go after $54. I can slide so far down that I can always recover. That is because the losing streaks don't last that long.  Here is the deal with all this. I probe for mini upticks as mini streaks. I grind my way back up. I know I can recover if I'm just willing to wage the war to do it. It requires intense concentration to see the working mini win options.  I'm hunting thru 12 different sets in just a few seconds. When one group is flat another can give up a single win. I just plug away. Everything changes. These changes last for a while but the best win is the first win off of these changes. That is why you see me quieting on long streaks all the time. It's better to take the win and keep it than to keep going and take the loss that must come when the trend ends.  I do this that way because I'm betting into micro trends. I'm all about the changes and getting 1 net win off of it.  When you stay for two in a row you get a loss half the time. Then you need another win just to get back to that first win.  That requires more wins. In other words trends give up 1 win easier than they give up 2. I often bet 1 whole valued bet and if it's a monster sized streak I will bet a next bet at half the value on the same trend.

This way you are playing a game of the quality of changes. Each bet is not that important. You play the stretches of changes for an aggregate plus from the stretch.

I use to play all day long for the monster win streak and then explode on the casino. It works too. It's just all wrong for me.  I like the slow grind from the minimal exploitation now. It's consistent.  Now I shared all this. I demonstrated it. I taught it. It's out there. I show it off with the slow grind and then the flash to the top level. I made it to top 14. That's all a joke. My slow steady, always win, is the right way for me.  All this grabbing the top spot stuff is just a giant trudge. It's more like getting stuck climbing the same easy beginner rock climbing route. After a few times you can do it in your sleep.  I don't want to put primary strong focus into an unrewarding activity.  That's all that is.

So I have no problem focusing when I want to. Once it becomes boring and I get lazy it all burns up in a plane crash.
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

Moxy

Quote from: gizmotron2 on Jun 20, 02:37 PM 2020
All it takes for me is to decide to win. I then do all the work and patience required to get my three net wins. I can do it at will just about every time. I have never failed to gain the upper hand when I use 20 times my double down base level bet.  By example a $1 chip value goal would be $54 as a won session. At $2, the double down value, a single net win is $36. That means that a bankroll of $720 is needed to go after $54. I can slide so far down that I can always recover. That is because the losing streaks don't last that long.  Here is the deal with all this. I probe for mini upticks as mini streaks. I grind my way back up. I know I can recover if I'm just willing to wage the war to do it. It requires intense concentration to see the working mini win options.  I'm hunting thru 12 different sets in just a few seconds. When one group is flat another can give up a single win. I just plug away. Everything changes. These changes last for a while but the best win is the first win off of these changes. That is why you see me quieting on long streaks all the time. It's better to take the win and keep it than to keep going and take the loss that must come when the trend ends.  I do this that way because I'm betting into micro trends. I'm all about the changes and getting 1 net win off of it.  When you stay for two in a row you get a loss half the time. Then you need another win just to get back to that first win.  That requires more wins. In other words trends give up 1 win easier than they give up 2. I often bet 1 whole valued bet and if it's a monster sized streak I will bet a next bet at half the value on the same trend.

This way you are playing a game of the quality of changes. Each bet is not that important. You play the stretches of changes for an aggregate plus from the stretch.

I use to play all day long for the monster win streak and then explode on the casino. It works too. It's just all wrong for me.  I like the slow grind from the minimal exploitation now. It's consistent.  Now I shared all this. I demonstrated it. I taught it. It's out there. I show it off with the slow grind and then the flash to the top level. I made it to top 14. That's all a joke. My slow steady, always win, is the right way for me.  All this grabbing the top spot stuff is just a giant trudge. It's more like getting stuck climbing the same easy beginner rock climbing route. After a few times you can do it in your sleep.  I don't want to put primary strong focus into an unrewarding activity.  That's all that is.

So I have no problem focusing when I want to. Once it becomes boring and I get lazy it all burns up in a plane crash.

Beyond recognition.

gizmotron2

Quote from: Moxy on Jun 20, 02:44 PM 2020Beyond recognition.
Thanks for your insightful contribution to discussion.  You have always been a valued member of this forum.
Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

pepper

Quote from: gizmotron2 on Jun 20, 03:04 PM 2020Thanks for your insightful contribution to discussion. 
No problem.
Quote from: gizmotron2 on Jun 20, 03:04 PM 2020You have always been a valued member of this forum.
Thanks.

Your anti-abolitionist ways are gonna catch up to you in the end. Go ahead and burn Washington's statue. He gave you this wonderful country after all. So let's abolish the police and have the strongest criminals run our cities.
The Italians protected their Christopher Columbus statue.
Looks like the "peaceful" "protesters" are having trouble in Seattle. Some "Summer of Love". What a great democratic mayor they have. Huh?

Go rent a riot, BLM thugs!!!!

pepper

The police officer in Atlanta got 11 charges, including felony murder, for doing his job. How cool! We can loot and riot, like a baby, and get everything handed over to us.
Several officers in the past have been cleared and/or not even charged for shooting someone who stole their taser and shot it at them. Now, it's a free for all, spit on the cops, do whatever you want to police idiot fest. This same district attorney just said, 2 weeks ago, that using a taser is considered deadly force. I guess that rule only applies to the police.
Anyone who votes democratic from now on clearly has nothing between their ears. They are a national security threat. They mishandled covid. Look at the statistics. They watched their cities burn during the riots, refusing help from Trump. Look at the statistics.

Moxy

 
Quote from: pepper on Jun 20, 11:05 PM 2020
No problem.Thanks.

Your anti-abolitionist ways are gonna catch up to you in the end. Go ahead and burn Washington's statue. He gave you this wonderful country after all. So let's abolish the police and have the strongest criminals run our cities.
The Italians protected their Christopher Columbus statue.
Looks like the "peaceful" "protesters" are having trouble in Seattle. Some "Summer of Love". What a great democratic mayor they have. Huh?

Go rent a riot, BLM thugs!!!!

What in the f*** are talking about you fundamentalist tool?

I don't give a flying f*** about the confederate flag one way or the other. 
I don't give a flying f*** about kneeling one way or the other. 
I don't give a flying f*** about the confederate statues one way or the other. 
I don't give a flying f*** about the riots, looting, protests.  It's a waste of time "orchestrated" by the elites and is destroying the little guy along with it.

But, except for the looting and rioting, it's all protected by the 1st amendment.

We got bigger worries with the trillions and trillions in bailout going to the plutocratic elites (corporations) and top 100 billionaires in America in full view with us regular folk getting 300 mil in scraps.

But sheeps will continue to sheep.  Hint, hint.








Moxy

Also, its the 21st century. 

Quit damning the lgbtq community, unbaptized babies, atheists, "heathens", pro-choice advocates, Nation of Islam, etc., to hell you religious kooks.


Steve

Hint: stop thinking your votes make a difference.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

pepper

Quote from: Moxy on Jun 20, 11:26 PM 2020What in the f*** are talking about you fundamentalist tool?

I don't give a flying f*** about the confederate flag one way or the other.
I don't give a flying f*** about kneeling one way or the other.
I don't give a flying f*** about the confederate statues one way or the other.
I don't give a flying f*** about the riots, looting, protests.  It's a waste of time "orchestrated" by the elites and is destroying the little guy along with it.

But, except for the looting and rioting, it's all protected by the 1st amendment.

We got bigger worries with the trillions and trillions in bailout going to the plutocratic elites (corporations) and top 100 billionaires in America in full view with us regular folk getting 300 mil in scraps.

But sheeps will continue to sheep.  Hint, hint.
Not all the statues are even confederates, some are abolitionists.

-