When to Start

[klw]

CHT relays:

"There are few issues that are misleading that Dyslexic posted that's mathematically incorrect.

The first is the application of PhP.

It's not the complete cycle of 37+1 spins to get a repeat that PhP is about.

It's about" x" spins that is lesser than 38 spins that use PhP principle to get a repeat. The larger value of "x" gives a higher confidence level vv.

The second is this misleading suggestion of 100% winning hermetically at 38spins.

This is not the application of PhP.

Independent trials means this is a stochastical model with uncertainty which is expressed probabilistically with confidence interval.

Third, PhP defines the probabilistic certainty of "x". By itself, it can be exploited but the edge is small.

To get the higher edge you have to define "x" with another math principle. That's not discussed on RRBB's thread.

That's why I conclude that Dyslexic does not have proper understanding of PhP and RRBB more likely does not know the complete solution.

Finally, since you guys are attempting to find a solution the first thing is to correct your understanding about "stitching". In the context of math, the current interpretation of "stitching" is wrong.

Second, the understanding about cycles is wrong. It's not about cycles per se but "PhP cycle", that is cycles with the application of PhP.

Thirdly, there's no such thing as a non-random game of independent trials. This is wrong.

For starters correct your current understanding of PhP which is wrong."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So what is CHT saying ? Are we to ignore everything Dyksexlic has ever written ? Is he a fraud ? Which bits are worth following ?

Are we wasting our time trying to find a solution to his riddles ?

TRD , we are all waiting to be guided by CHT through you. Perhaps he could give us some guidance in the right direction. He seems to have a lot of knowledge of the subject.

Cheers.

[Blueprint]

He seems to have a lot of knowledge of the subject.

Maybe if you want stock indicators.  I prefer to learn from those actually doing what they speak of.

[klw]

Maybe if you want stock indicators.  I prefer to learn from those actually doing what they speak of.

Totally agree Blueprint.

I am waiting for CHT to reply. After all he or someone he knows has done independent trials, so he must have the exact same model that Dyksexlic used for his system. It would save collectively hundreds of man hours if we are all wasting our time. So come on CHT help us out as the thread has ground to a halt.

Cheers.

[Person S]

Maybe if you want stock indicators.  I prefer to learn from those actually doing what they speak of.

can you advise?

[Blueprint]

can you advise?

Nope.  I'm no expert.

[TRD]

I've simply received that in inbox .. & posted it as soon as seen. Its up to CHT about that.

[Stool_Pigeon]

3 posts that I have of Dr Dyk

Thanks for the content Badger!

The first riddle is an ec bet with straight.

Hello MoneyT101...
Just wondering how you came to that conclusion??

[Blueprint]

When do I have (6 uniques AND minimal 3 friends) OR (repeats and minimal 3 friends)?

This is the only question in mind these days.  I still wonder why...

[MoneyT101]

When do I have (6 uniques AND minimal 3 friends) OR (repeats and minimal 3 friends)?

This is the only question in mind these days.  I still wonder why...

20 H - friend unique
15 L - stranger unique
11 L - stranger unique
23 H - friend unique
1 L - stranger unique
1 L - stranger repeat


26 H - friend unique
8 L - stranger unique
32 H - friend unique
6 L - stranger unique
5 L - stranger unique
16 L - stranger unique

[Blueprint]

26 H - friend unique
8 L - stranger unique
32 H - friend unique
6 L - stranger unique
5 L - stranger unique
16 L - stranger unique

3 friends?

[MoneyT101]

3 friends?

The theory says you will have either 3 friends or 3 strangers….

Just cause I labeled it stranger shouldn’t matter we have 3 friends 6 uniques and we have 3 friends with repeats

[Blueprint]

Forget theory.

I read it as needing ... "AND minimal 3" friends with both repeats and uniques.   Semantics, I guess. 

I still don't get how this helps though.

[alexlaf]

 is this  Biased Wheel?

[ati]

When do I have (6 uniques AND minimal 3 friends) OR (repeats and minimal 3 friends)?

This is the only question in mind these days.  I still wonder why...

The question is, repeats of what? Maybe you need to consider other streams. When a line repeats, we can still have a unique straight friend.
I'm not really a fan of publicizing private messages and in-depth discussions, but there was a mention about two bets, so we probably need to consider more streams when we talk about friends & strangers.

Also, did you ever wonder why it works 66% of 6 spins, and why 6 uniques is a precondition? Maybe because 34% of straight cycles repeat within 6 spins, and 66% are longer than 6 spins?

[MoneyT101]

The question is, repeats of what? Maybe you need to consider other streams. When a line repeats, we can still have a unique straight friend.
I'm not really a fan of publicizing private messages and in-depth discussions, but there was a mention about two bets, so we probably need to consider more streams when we talk about friends & strangers.

Also, did you ever wonder why it works 66% of 6 spins, and why 6 uniques is a precondition? Maybe because 34% of straight cycles repeat within 6 spins, and 66% are longer than 6 spins?

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥