• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

What's next...

Started by praline, Jun 03, 02:10 PM 2022

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

praline

Hi everybody!

What would you do next if you have just found the way to create a balance (after 7 years) by using two dependent sets of numbers and you are looking to limit it with combined cycle?
 :question:
Thanks for all replies!
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

praline

I will try to answer the questions that one my have.

What balance?
Balance between high/low derived BUT under a condition. Not very different it’s something like 52% before and 50 % now.
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

praline

Limit it with combined cycle.

Actually it is not that I’m looking on how to limit it as it has a natural end. The question is how I can use this conditional balance.
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

D1

Can you give an example please ?

praline

An example of what?
Of conditional probability?
Of combined cycle?
Of balance?
Of the end of the cycle?
An example of what??
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

Blueprint

Quote from: praline on Jun 03, 02:10 PM 2022
Hi everybody!

What would you do next if you have just found the way to create a balance (after 7 years) by using two dependent sets of numbers and you are looking to limit it with combined cycle?
:question:
Thanks for all replies!

By keeping sessions short?  No idea otherwise.

praline

Your answer is more priyanka’s way of play (aka random thoughts).
How can you make your session short within combined cycle by placing a bet on every spin?
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

praline

I think that “short sessions” is more a statistical approach, like cycles on cycles on cycles bets combined with non random.
Instead here I’m looking for a way to use the process of number generation that is apparently random but if you look under different prospective or angle it’s not random any more.
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

praline

Another question based on previous thoughts:

Often what happens more loose more so maybe I should focus on some event within those cycles that maybe is rarer than others but it will happen 100% on every cycle?? Is there such an event within combined cycle?
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

praline

Quote from: praline link=topic=28597.msg254062#msg254062 date=1654351860
Is there such an event within combined cycle?
/quote]

Or maybe some combination of events can give almost 100
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

Blueprint

Quote from: praline on Jun 04, 09:56 AM 2022
Your answer is more priyanka’s way of play (aka random thoughts).
How can you make your session short within combined cycle by placing a bet on every spin?

By defining why you’re placing them. 

praline

Since the repeat on low derived for streets is only 70%, there must be a place we’re those missing 26% (~) has gone?
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

praline

Quote from: Blueprint on Jun 04, 10:16 AM 2022
By defining why you’re placing them.

But the average is 5-6 spins and you should win without predicting.
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

MoneyT101

Quote from: praline on Jun 04, 10:16 AM 2022
Since the repeat on low derived for streets is only 70%, there must be a place we’re those missing 26% (~) has gone?

Hey praline been a while, how’s everything?

Not sure how you got to 70%.  A repeat on low derived for streets is above 95%

Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole

Herbyx

Quote from: MoneyT101 on Jun 06, 01:16 PM 2022A repeat on low derived for streets is above 95%

Hi all,
after computer crash  >:D and loss of several passwords I'm here with an extended name

Simulation:
500.000 spins without zero (for simplicity)
Repeat from position:
{{1, 41683}, {2, 31419}, {3, 21835}, {4, 14012}, {5, 8155},
{6, 4160}, {7, 1837}, {8, 635}, {9, 196}, {10, 52}, {11, 7}}

gives 97.8% repeats on low

CU

-