• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

## News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

## What's next...

Started by praline, Jun 03, 02:10 PM 2022

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

#### praline

Hi everybody!

What would you do next if you have just found the way to create a balance (after 7 years) by using two dependent sets of numbers and you are looking to limit it with combined cycle?

Thanks for all replies!
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

#### praline

I will try to answer the questions that one my have.

What balance?
Balance between high/low derived BUT under a condition. Not very different itâ€™s something like 52% before and 50 % now.
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

#### praline

Limit it with combined cycle.

Actually it is not that Iâ€™m looking on how to limit it as it has a natural end. The question is how I can use this conditional balance.
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

#### D1

Can you give an example please ?

#### praline

An example of what?
Of conditional probability?
Of combined cycle?
Of balance?
Of the end of the cycle?
An example of what??
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

#### Blueprint

Quote from: praline on Jun 03, 02:10 PM 2022
Hi everybody!

What would you do next if you have just found the way to create a balance (after 7 years) by using two dependent sets of numbers and you are looking to limit it with combined cycle?

Thanks for all replies!

By keeping sessions short?  No idea otherwise.

#### praline

How can you make your session short within combined cycle by placing a bet on every spin?
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

#### praline

I think that â€œshort sessionsâ€ is more a statistical approach, like cycles on cycles on cycles bets combined with non random.
Instead here Iâ€™m looking for a way to use the process of number generation that is apparently random but if you look under different prospective or angle itâ€™s not random any more.
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

#### praline

Another question based on previous thoughts:

Often what happens more loose more so maybe I should focus on some event within those cycles that maybe is rarer than others but it will happen 100% on every cycle?? Is there such an event within combined cycle?
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

#### praline

Is there such an event within combined cycle?
/quote]

Or maybe some combination of events can give almost 100
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

#### Blueprint

Quote from: praline on Jun 04, 09:56 AM 2022
How can you make your session short within combined cycle by placing a bet on every spin?

By defining why youâ€™re placing them.

#### praline

Since the repeat on low derived for streets is only 70%, there must be a place weâ€™re those missing 26% (~) has gone?
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

#### praline

Quote from: Blueprint on Jun 04, 10:16 AM 2022
By defining why youâ€™re placing them.

But the average is 5-6 spins and you should win without predicting.
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

#### MoneyT101

Quote from: praline on Jun 04, 10:16 AM 2022
Since the repeat on low derived for streets is only 70%, there must be a place weâ€™re those missing 26% (~) has gone?

Hey praline been a while, howâ€™s everything?

Not sure how you got to 70%.  A repeat on low derived for streets is above 95%

Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole

#### Herbyx

Quote from: MoneyT101 on Jun 06, 01:16 PM 2022A repeat on low derived for streets is above 95%

Hi all,
after computer crash  and loss of several passwords I'm here with an extended name

Simulation:
500.000 spins without zero (for simplicity)
Repeat from position:
{{1, 41683}, {2, 31419}, {3, 21835}, {4, 14012}, {5, 8155},
{6, 4160}, {7, 1837}, {8, 635}, {9, 196}, {10, 52}, {11, 7}}

gives 97.8% repeats on low

CU

-