• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

PROMISED CONSTANT WINNING BET

Started by F_LAT_INO, Jun 25, 03:19 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

F_LAT_INO

One more attachment of Wiesbaden
216 UN. profit with new version.

BTW--Did any of you noticed that I'm testing new version
with the same actuals that have been testing other mods.
Does this tells you anything?????
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

marivo


[/quote]
Quote from: F_LAT_INO on Nov 30, 03:46 PM 2010
One more attachment of Wiesbaden
216 UN. profit with new version.

by the way--Did any of you noticed that I'm testing new version
with the same actuals that have been testing other mods.
Does this tells you anything?????


You never lose progression for now, right? I tried that way 3 sessions, 1 was very good, but on other 2 I did lose progressions. Ill try again. Hope I have patience to make sheets of history too, so you can see what I am actual doing.


marivo

What should I do in this situation considering your latest rules:


SPIN   NUM   SEC TRIGGER    L/W
19        20        5        3459        first trigger   
20        31        7        3457        second trigger/lose considering first trigger 3459   
21        25        7        3457        win considering second trigger 3457/lose considering first trigger 3459   

Should I start betting on trigger 3459?
   

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: marivo on Dec 01, 03:40 AM 2010
What should I do in this situation considering your latest rules:


SPIN   NUM   SEC TRIGGER    L/W
19        20        5        3459        first trigger   
20        31        7        3457        second trigger/lose considering first trigger 3459   
21        25        7        3457        win considering second trigger 3457/lose considering first trigger 3459   

Should I start betting on trigger 3459?
   

Marivo dear,
3,4,5,9.......now we are waiting for 2 virtual loses
7---virtual los
7---virtual los.....which is a trigger to start betting on sectors  3,4,5,9.
Hope it helps.[/color
And by the way,there is another small tveak in this last version which I
didn't reveal as yet,but those that are acquinted with all mods will easily spot it
carefully reading my excel sheets.This I will reveal to these that are contributing,with
complete explanation and the tool/Ophis/to play.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

marivo

Ok, thanks. What about the situation in this selection from your "Book new version 3.xlsx" (see attachment): if you look at spin 192, numb. 9, sec 3 (we are talking on betting on recents with no rule after 2 wins and 1 lose) you marked as win, but there is no sector 3 among recent sectors, how could it win then?

chrisbis

That's one spin number covered by Recents and Furthest from what I can see- look to the right,
and see he's tracking Furthest  as well as Recents.

Not sure if this is live play results, or retrospectively done, by going back over the results (spins)
and playing it again so2speak.

Am I on the right Tracker here F LAT INO?

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: marivo on Dec 01, 04:14 AM 2010
Ok, thanks. What about the situation in this selection from your "Book new version 3.xlsx" (see attachment): if you look at spin 192, numb. 9, sec 3 (we are talking on betting on recents with no rule after 2 wins and 1 lose) you marked as win, but there is no sector 3 among recent sectors, how could it win then?
[/quote]Marivo my friend,
It is evident that you haven't grasp this as yet/therefore you should
be rechecking your 2 losing sessions/as you are getting it wrong.

--we are talking of betting on 4 furthest remaining/no rules/
not betting on 4 recents as you thought.
5
6
8
4
5--vurtual vin......following 4 recents as a tracker
4--virtual win.......could be 3,4,5 virtuals
2--virtual los........concerning tracking recents

Therefore we are now having 4 remaining sectors unhit---1,3,7,9-on which we
are starting to bet on progression 1,2,4,8,16....

3--won

Hopping you are getting it now.
/color]
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: chrisbis on Dec 01, 04:30 AM 2010
That's one spin number covered by Recents and Furthest from what I can see- look to the right,
and see he's tracking Furthest  as well as Recents.

Not sure if this is live play results, or retrospectively done, by going back over the results (spins)
and playing it again so2speak.

Am I on the right Tracker here F LAT INO?
[/quote
Chrisbis mate,

Yes these spins from Wiesbaden are the same spins I used in other modes testings/as
these are only ones I got in my files/so to show the difference about final results.
There is 5 more to come then we can resime.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

marivo

Quote from: marivo on Dec 01, 04:14 AM 2010
Ok, thanks. What about the situation in this selection from your "Book new version 3.xlsx" (see attachment): if you look at spin 192, numb. 9, sec 3 (we are talking on betting on recents with no rule after 2 wins and 1 lose) you marked as win, but there is no sector 3 among recent sectors, how could it win then?
[/quote]Marivo my friend,
It is evident that you haven't grasp this as yet/therefore you should
be rechecking your 2 losing sessions/as you are getting it wrong.

--we are talking of betting on 4 furthest remaining/no rules/
not betting on 4 recents as you thought.
5
6
8
4
5--vurtual vin......following 4 recents as a tracker
4--virtual win.......could be 3,4,5 virtuals
2--virtual los........concerning tracking recents

Therefore we are now having 4 remaining sectors unhit---1,3,7,9-on which we
are starting to bet on progression 1,2,4,8,16....

3--won

Hopping you are getting it now.
/color]

Excellent! Thank you F LAT INO!

marivo

Just finished session playing under newest rules. It was very smooth game. Made +312 in 223 spins and with max. progression 3. I just have history for playing in MOD5 (from Tracker). It also played very good, went up to +700, but at the end it was lower then me playing under newest rules. Was playing in BetVoyager No Zero table.

F_LAT_INO

Marivo mate,
I would prefer you test it with single zero roulette.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

ophis

i just dont get it why graph is "broken" at beginning.
Multi Systems Tracker
➨ [url="//rmst.forumer.com"]RMST.forumer.com[/url]

F_LAT_INO

Gents,

---WE NEED TESTERS FOR LAST VERSION OF THE BET
---Only live any casino numbers--not rx,rng numbers.
---3000 numbers minimum.
---All serious testers will be awarded in the end of task.

Thanks,hopping for your help.
Any queries let me know.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

marivo

Just finished another seasson on RNG European Roulette (BetVoyager) latest rules. Was not good: -840 (I lost 4 progressions). I attach history for MOD5.

So I need to test in live casinos like DublinBet? Can you give me more detailed instructions?

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: marivo on Dec 01, 02:20 PM 2010
Just finished another seasson on RNG European Roulette (BetVoyager) latest rules. Was not good: -840 (I lost 4 progressions). I attach history for MOD5.

So I need to test in live casinos like DublinBet? Can you give me more detailed instructions?
Marivo mate,
You are doing it all wrong.
Study my excel sheets some more,and the latest rules/version /consist of
two different bets playing it together.

You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

-