• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Beating roulette with math..

Started by Fripper, Dec 31, 09:26 AM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 36 Guests are viewing this topic.

GLC

Fripper, Aleks06, Bayes,

Keep up the good work.  This is very interesting.

I'm wondering if any of you have ever looked at method of playing the labby I've read at a few locations where they start out with like 10 imaginary 1's and each is the unit you will win when you have completed that labby.  This gives us 10 labbies at once and we can pick and choose which numbers to combine for each bet.  This also helps us keep the bets low.

George
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

aleks06

Session 6


215 spins

highest bet : 38

lowest point : -127

profit : +19

Since I read belgian latest post I use sometimes more "zero's" to stretch the labby while a bad run, this way I m more able to control the bets and keep them low.

Hi GLC, I m not sure that I have completely understood your concept. Could you give an example. please.

GLC

Here's an example.  I will use only 4 labbies instead of 10 (or more). I usually start with 2  1's.

11
11
11
11

These are the beginning of my 4 labbies.

1st bet is for 2 units and is lost.  Now:

112
11
11
11

Next bet is for 2 units and is lost.

112
112
11
11

Next bet is for 2 units and is won.

12
12
11
11

As you can see, I can remove units where ever I want.
Next bet is for 2 units and is lost

12
12
112
11

Next bet is for 2 units and is won.

12
12
12
1

Next bet is for 3 units and is won.

12
12
1

Next bet is for 2 units and is lost.

12
12
13

Next bet could be for 2,3 or 5 units.
Let's say it is for 5 units and we win.

12
1
1

If we had the following:

12355
11233
122
123468
1122344
etc...

We can bet 2,3,4,5,6,7,8, etc...

Let's say we bet 7 and win

12355
1123
122
123468
112234

We can remove them from where ever we want.

We can start with 10 or 20 labbies whatever we want.

Anytime we are ahead a pre-determined amount we can stop and re-start.
If our numbers get too large, we can break them down into more lines of smaller numbers etc...

This may be very near to what you guys are doing with the zeros.

I'm not sure.  It gets pretty complicated for an old brain.

George

In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

Tomla021

Have you guys tried the Midas method ? A diff kind of labby
"No Whining, just Winning"

Fripper

Quote from: GLC on Jan 18, 03:36 PM 2011
Fripper, Aleks06, Bayes,

Keep up the good work.  This is very interesting.

I'm wondering if any of you have ever looked at method of playing the labby I've read at a few locations where they start out with like 10 imaginary 1's and each is the unit you will win when you have completed that labby.  This gives us 10 labbies at once and we can pick and choose which numbers to combine for each bet.  This also helps us keep the bets low.

George

Hi george

No, I haven't tested that.
The main thing is to keep our bets low but still be playing with the 65/135. it's the main thing.
Maybe, your way can, but I haven't looked at it yet. I'm short of time already.

Quote from: aleks06 on Jan 18, 04:14 PM 2011
Session 6


215 spins

highest bet : 38

lowest point : -127

profit : +19

Since I read belgian latest post I use sometimes more "zero's" to stretch the labby while a bad run, this way I m more able to control the bets and keep them low.

Hi GLC, I m not sure that I have completely understood your concept. Could you give an example. please.

Good job once again.

But, as we have stated.
The more you use the more wins we need to come back.
But, it keeps the bets low and that's the good part.
But when we see a bad run, this may be the best way to keep the bets low, it needs more testing.

:thumbsup:
All i'm doing is living my life.

GLC

Quote from: Tomla021 on Jan 18, 07:09 PM 2011
Have you guys tried the Midas method ? A diff kind of labby

Tom,

We have looked at the Midas method which is also an improvement on the original method, but not as safe as this one in my opinion.

G
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

Fripper

Session 5 of bayes horror sessions

Did bet even

118 odd, 76 even

I played until spin 203 to end the last labby.

+3 in 54 spins, ended first labby
+5 in 78 spins, ended second labby
+10 in 117 spins, ended third labby
+13 in 138 spins, ended forth labby
+14 in 174 spins, ended fifth labby
+17 in 203 spins, ended sixth labby

Highest bet : 33 units
Lowest point : -62 units

Both excel file and RX file attached.
:thumbsup:
All i'm doing is living my life.

Tomla021

thanks guys,,
i played around with midas and you can also split labbies etc--didnt really care for it but.....
"No Whining, just Winning"

Fripper

Just to keep you guys motivated.

I have played 21 sessions for real at betvoyager.
Started with a bankroll of 1000 units.
Don't know the highest bet, but it isn't over 100 units.

A total profit of +679 units in 3518 spins.
That is 679/3518 ~ 0,193 units/spin.

In those 3518 spins, the no-bets is also counted so the average will be a lot higher if we just count the spins that we bet.

:thumbsup:

All i'm doing is living my life.

aleks06

Nice Fripper I think I'm going to start playing for real soon.

At the moment I can't clear the 7th session (230+spins around -700). This is the hardest session I have ever played.
But I will re-do it setting my bet limit higher

Fripper

Quote from: aleks06 on Jan 20, 02:01 PM 2011
Nice Fripper I think I'm going to start playing for real soon.

At the moment I can't clear the 7th session (230+spins around -700). This is the hardest session I have ever played.
But I will re-do it setting my bet limit higher

Thanks mate

Ok, I will continue with the sessions one by one. I had some problems at first with session nr 3 but after some new rules I got it very good.

So, do you use more zero's longer in a session when there are no zero's left to stretch the labby even more?
If so, do you have some rules of when you do it?

Cheers
All i'm doing is living my life.

aleks06

I stretch my labby when the figures reach approximately 25. I'm still looking for the best ratio duration of the run / size of bets.
For the session #7 my labby's are getting too long because of the zero's so It's endless. I will re-set to 50 max for the figures I think ( so max bet : 100 units )

aleks06

I finally cleared it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This is the hell session.

241 spins

profit : 7 units

lowest point : -872

highest bet : 84 units

:P :sad2: :sad2: :sad2:

Fripper

Quote from: aleks06 on Jan 21, 03:45 AM 2011
I stretch my labby when the figures reach approximately 25. I'm still looking for the best ratio duration of the run / size of bets.
For the session #7 my labby's are getting too long because of the zero's so It's endless. I will re-set to 50 max for the figures I think ( so max bet : 100 units )

Ok. I'm not sure about this, because when we have a hard time we will need to keep the figures as low as possible and end the labby as soon as possible.

But as you say, after the figures have reached 50 for the figures it may be a good point.
The winning streak must come, the question is how long we can go on.

All i'm doing is living my life.

Fripper

Session 6 of bayes horror sessions.

Did bet even.

110 odd, 73 even

I played until 192 spins to end the seventh labby.

+3 in 33 spins, ended first labby
+4 in 55 spins, ended second labby
+5 in 88 spins, ended third labby
+7 in 111 spins, ended forth labby
+9 in 130 spins, ended fifth labby
+13 in 178 spins, ended sixth labby
+14 in 192 spins, ended seventh labby

Highest bet 46 units
Lowest point -114 units.

Both excel file and RX file attached  :thumbsup:
All i'm doing is living my life.

-