Matrix Turbo !

[ophis]

OK great I was going to ask you what the new update was 


If you lose to a zero, will it be recorded in the accounting as a loss?

yes. it only ignores it in tracking and bet selection... you still lose if it hit tho.

[malcop]

yes. it only ignores it in tracking and bet selection... you still lose if it hit though.

That is great, saves me having to make a mental note of zero losses.


Thank you very much.

[malcop]

Ophis,


Do you think it could be possible to have an option, something like a tick box, that allows you to link the progression if you want to play both dozens & columns.


At the moment each one has their own progression, but would be nice to play one progression for both.


Thanks


malcop

[Amazin]

So is everyone winning with so far?

[furple]

So is everyone winning with so far?

yep...just use this progression and your good to go. 1,1,2,3,4,6,9,14,21,31,47,70,105,158,237 (709 chips)

[buffalowizard]

What's the link to the latest tracker for this please guys

[furple]

What's the link to the latest tracker for this please guys

link:s://dl.dropbox.com/u/12200022/mst_v169.zip

[buffalowizard]

Thanks furple

Have you just revisited this or been playing for long time?

[atlantis]

Instead of triplets why not bet for vertical doublets?

Use matrix x3 for recording dozens

Track for 3 *consecutive * vertical non-match doublets then commence to bet for a MATCH to occur...
(ZERO voids tracking)

Maybe use buffalowizards suggested progression:

So maybe implement a 5 step progression. If lost, then another 5 step progression aimed at mild recovery.

1 1 2 3 4   first level = 11u

2 3 4 5 6   second level = 20u

Total risk=31u

113
311 
321   
221
332 - trigger col3 (3 non-matches)   
113   
133 - win step 4 col1     
123   
123       
321


223
323 
211 - trigger col3 (3 non-matches) 
123
130 - win step 4 col 1
223   
323   
312 
212 - trigger col1 (3 non-matches) ; won step 1 col 2 
132


113   
311
321
221   
332 - trigger col3 (3 non-matches)
113
133 - win step 4 col1
123   
223
323
211 - trigger col3 (3 non-matches)
123
130 - win step 4 col1
223
323
312
212 - trigger col1 (3 non-matches) ; win step 1 col2
132   
122
133
230 - trigger col1 (3 non-matches); win step 1 col2
323
312
311   


113
331 - trigger col3
132 - win step 2 col2
122
133 
211 - trigger col1
311 - win step 4 col2
331
231
233   
212 
233
232
111 - trigger col 2
231 - win step 4 col3
302
233
233
122 - trigger col 3
121 - win step 1 col1
321 
221   
332 - trigger col 3
303 - win step 1 col1
233
123 
110
113 
232 - trigger col 3
232 - win step 1 col1
111 - trigger col 3
113 - win step 1 col1
212


111
332 - trigger col1
312 - win step 1 col1
132
210
203
321
113 - trigger col3
322
131
111 - win step 7 col 1
133 
323 - trigger col1 ; win step 2 col3
121
310 - trigger col2
133
111 - win step 4 col1
112 
223 - trigger col 2
311
333 - win step 5 col1
332   
213 - trigger col2
333 - win step 4 col3
112 - trigger col 3
211 - win step 2 col2
222
122 - trigger col1; win step 1 col2
223   
333 - trigger col2; win step 1 col3
321
331   
311   
233 - trigger col3
133 - win step 2 col2
233   
       
A.

[malcop]

I think it works fine as it is, here is a session I played this morning playing both Dozens & Columns.


Progression used: 1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,4,4,4,4


[attach=1]

[Face]

Matrix Turbo!  LIVE or RNG? 

[malcop]

Matrix Turbo!  LIVE or RNG? 

I never play RNG

[malcop]

Has anyone tried to play Matrix Turbo using EC's?

[buffalowizard]

Has anyone tried to play Matrix Turbo using ECs?

I did look into it Malcop but found that you become too often restricted and there are fewer progressions that can pull you put of a hole

[Face]

I never play RNG

"I always learn something"