Matrix Turbo !

[Twisteruk]

Just see each column as a different data stream

A B C




So spin 5 would be in Column B Spin 18 would be in Column C etc etc

Play Vertical

Are we all playing like this ?

[buffalowizard]

Ok, I have been playing like Atlantis.

Twister, so here column A and B have lost but C has won. That would be the third stage of your progression right?

123
123
213 

[Twisteruk]

Ok, I have been playing like Atlantis.

Twister, so here column A and B have lost but C has won. That would be the third stage of your progression right?

123
123
213 

Errrmm no lol

That would be Level 1 loss, Level 1 loss, Level 1 Win


Opinions !?!?

[buffalowizard]

I suppose both have their merits. Your's gets to the profits faster. Do you wait until each column has a win before closing it down?

[atlantis]

Twister,

From your example it looks like you have a separate progression for each DOZ and you are recording them independently

DOZ1         DOZ2        DOZ 3
====================
Level1 L ; Level 1 L ; Level 1 W

Is that right?

A.

[Twisteruk]

I suppose both have their merits. Your's gets to the profits faster. Do you wait until each column has a win before closing it down?

I play like this, looking at just one column for ease


A

1
1
2 Loss level 1
3
3
2 Loss level 2
1
1
3 Loss level 3
3
3 Win level 4

Either close column down or continue for another attack. I think either is good.

[Twisteruk]

Twister,

From your example it looks like you have a separate progression for each DOZ and you are recording them independently

DOZ1         DOZ2        DOZ 3
====================
Level1 L ; Level 1 L ; Level 1 W

Is that right?

A.

No, not each Doz but each Column

[buffalowizard]

I like Twisters way actually, because it may just reduce the longer runs, that you find when hunting horizontally as it were.

So, 3 seperate progressions then

[atlantis]

I play like this, looking at just one column for ease


A

1
1
2 Loss level 1
3
3
2 Loss level 2
1
1
3 Loss level 3
3
3 Win level 4

Either close column down or continue for another attack. I think either is good.

Personally wouldn't play it that way as you are betting the layout and not the matrix.
A.

[Twisteruk]

I like Twisters way actually, because it may just reduce the longer runs, that you find when hunting horizontally as it were.

So, 3 separate progressions then

Thats how I play it, but only because I thought that was the correct way  


So far so good !

[buffalowizard]

Just quickie run

ABC

113    
311
321
221    
332
113
133
123    
223
323
211
123
130
223
323
312
212
132    
122
133
230
323
312
311

A wins 1@1 1@2 1@3
B wins 1@3
C wins 2@1 1@2

[Twisteruk]

Personally wouldn't play it that way as you are betting the layout and not the matrix.
A.

I dont understand 

The layout is in the Matrix

[atlantis]

Just quickie run

ABC

113    
311
321
221    
332
113
133
123    
223
323
211
123
130
223
323
312
212
132    
122
133
230
323
312
311

A wins 1@1 1@2 1@3
B wins 1@3
C wins 2@1 1@2

Confirmed. Same result.

A.

[buffalowizard]

To be honest, the results probably will be the same in the long run either way...I reckon we got another winner on our hands.

[buffalowizard]

Great! So we all know how it works now and can play it the same way too?